Lex Minucia de duobus legibus Arminiis abrogandis (Nova Roma)
m (recat) |
m (added <onlyinclude> tags) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<div class="scriptum"> | <div class="scriptum"> | ||
| + | <onlyinclude> | ||
Lex to Repeal Current Items of Legislation | Lex to Repeal Current Items of Legislation | ||
I don't have a proper Latin name for this measure yet, but comitia's approval of this item will officially repeal the following legislations: | I don't have a proper Latin name for this measure yet, but comitia's approval of this item will officially repeal the following legislations: | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
<div class="lexcomment"> | <div class="lexcomment"> | ||
This Lex did not have lasting effect, and lapsed after approval. | This Lex did not have lasting effect, and lapsed after approval. | ||
| + | </onlyinclude> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
[[Category:Lapsed leges (Nova Roma)]] | [[Category:Lapsed leges (Nova Roma)]] | ||
Revision as of 04:26, 12 October 2020
|
This lex has LAPSED.
|
Lex to Repeal Current Items of Legislation I don't have a proper Latin name for this measure yet, but comitia's approval of this item will officially repeal the following legislations:
Lex Arminia Equitia de Dignitate Curule http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2004-06-30-ii.html
Lex Arminia Equitia de Sanctitate http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/leges/2004-08-13-ii.html
The last lines of both these leges (above) nullify their respective legal and binding forces. Further, there is no corresponding constitutional language that I can see to clarify their legal purpose. Although they are remarkable from an academic standpoint, the language of these legislations has caused issues of controversy, which might (at least theoretically) be avoided in future if we repeal them officially.
This Lex did not have lasting effect, and lapsed after approval.