Category talk:Commentarii Pontificum (Nova Roma)

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Legal commentary)
 
m (Added link)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Decreta & Responsa : Commentary==
 
==Decreta & Responsa : Commentary==
  
A. d. VII Kal. Qui. {{2006}} on the ReligioRomana e-mail list (message 8854 in the archive)  [[Aulus Apollonius Cordus (Nova Roma)|A. Apollonius]] asked about ''decreta'' and ''responsa'':
+
A. d. VII Kal. Qui. {{2006}} on the [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana ReligioRomana e-mail list] (message 8854 in the archive)  [[Aulus Apollonius Cordus (Nova Roma)|A. Apollonius]] asked about ''decreta'' and ''responsa'':
  
 
: Is this intended to be a technical distinction and, if so, what do the pontifices intend the terms to mean?
 
: Is this intended to be a technical distinction and, if so, what do the pontifices intend the terms to mean?

Latest revision as of 02:57, 5 July 2006

Decreta & Responsa : Commentary

A. d. VII Kal. Qui. C. Buteone Po. Minucia cos. MMDCCLIX a.u.c. on the ReligioRomana e-mail list (message 8854 in the archive) A. Apollonius asked about decreta and responsa:

Is this intended to be a technical distinction and, if so, what do the pontifices intend the terms to mean?

Q. Metellus pontifex replied (message 8855):

Simply, [decreta] carry specific legal implications, per the lex constitutiva. [A responsum] however, does not carry any specific legal implications, and is simply a statement by the College on a given topic (i.e., a response).
As things go on, however, I think we will be seeing more responsa and less decreta, though only time can tell.
Personal tools