User talk:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (ad Cn Lentulum respondeo)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
:Adsentior, Cn. Lentule!  Apud [[Fasti_MMDCCLXII|Fastos]] me uti pagina [[Roman calendar|de calendario Romano]] ad dies Atros nundinasque definiendos.  Fortasse paginae de calendario Romano et [[Fasti|de fastis]] ad paginam de calendario moueatur, ut solum paginae de calendario et [[Calendar (Nova Roma)|de calendario nouo]] remaneant?  Quo modo paginae duae nobis habentur, una de calendario antiquo, una de nouo. -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 20:26, 5 January 2009 (CET)
 
:Adsentior, Cn. Lentule!  Apud [[Fasti_MMDCCLXII|Fastos]] me uti pagina [[Roman calendar|de calendario Romano]] ad dies Atros nundinasque definiendos.  Fortasse paginae de calendario Romano et [[Fasti|de fastis]] ad paginam de calendario moueatur, ut solum paginae de calendario et [[Calendar (Nova Roma)|de calendario nouo]] remaneant?  Quo modo paginae duae nobis habentur, una de calendario antiquo, una de nouo. -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 20:26, 5 January 2009 (CET)
 +
 +
::Tibi Anglice respondeo, Metelle Pie, ut omnes qui hoc colloquium sequuntur nos intellegant, nam perpauci sunt editores hujus aranei Latine loquentes vel scribentes. I thought a lot on these articles and I think that all of them is necessary in one or another way. [[Calendar]] is just a page that shows the calendar. It should be pointing to our current calendar. [[Calendar (Nova Roma)]] should describe how the Nova Roman calendar is composed, how we reconstruct it, what the authorities are on calendar issues etc. [[Roman calendar]] describes the ancient roman calendar. [[Fasti]] perhaps could be merged in [[Calendar]], or redirected, but it is good if it remains a disambiguation page. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:02, 12 January 2009 (CET)

Revision as of 16:03, 12 January 2009

Platner-temple-line-trans-50.gif

Cultus Task Force
Member

A multilingual project to improve the Cultus Deorum documents on this site.


Calendar articles

Salve, Q. Metelle! I think we should have to make some order between the many general articles on calendar. It's quite a mess. We have now:

Instead of 4 we should have 2, one for ancient Rome, one for Nova Roma. What do you think? --Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 12:15, 5 January 2009 (CET)

Adsentior, Cn. Lentule! Apud Fastos me uti pagina de calendario Romano ad dies Atros nundinasque definiendos. Fortasse paginae de calendario Romano et de fastis ad paginam de calendario moueatur, ut solum paginae de calendario et de calendario nouo remaneant? Quo modo paginae duae nobis habentur, una de calendario antiquo, una de nouo. -- Q·CAEC·MET·POST 20:26, 5 January 2009 (CET)
Tibi Anglice respondeo, Metelle Pie, ut omnes qui hoc colloquium sequuntur nos intellegant, nam perpauci sunt editores hujus aranei Latine loquentes vel scribentes. I thought a lot on these articles and I think that all of them is necessary in one or another way. Calendar is just a page that shows the calendar. It should be pointing to our current calendar. Calendar (Nova Roma) should describe how the Nova Roman calendar is composed, how we reconstruct it, what the authorities are on calendar issues etc. Roman calendar describes the ancient roman calendar. Fasti perhaps could be merged in Calendar, or redirected, but it is good if it remains a disambiguation page. --Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 17:02, 12 January 2009 (CET)
Personal tools