Talk:Priests (Nova Roma)
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(Q re art name) |
m (ad Agricolam respondeo) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should this be moved to "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"? Or should we keep "Sacerdotes" as an article about sacerdotes in Roma Antiqua and use the English title (plus NR) for the modern article? [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 10:56, 8 November 2006 (CET) | Should this be moved to "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"? Or should we keep "Sacerdotes" as an article about sacerdotes in Roma Antiqua and use the English title (plus NR) for the modern article? [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 10:56, 8 November 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Metellus]] 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 02:52, 10 November 2006
Article name
Should this be moved to "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"? Or should we keep "Sacerdotes" as an article about sacerdotes in Roma Antiqua and use the English title (plus NR) for the modern article? Agricola 10:56, 8 November 2006 (CET)
- I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. Metellus 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET)
