Talk:MMDCCLX

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
  
I changed as well what was said about Sceptius. The way it was written, it had a small compound of slander against Sceptius. The situation and emotions were out of control on the Senate, the informations about Hispania had come all by third parts, so we cannot say anything certain, except he resigned. Very sad subject, I assure, since I have lived the matter.
+
I changed as well what was said about Sceptius. The way it was written, it had a small compound of unwilling slander, we cannot really say ´he did this´. The situation and emotions were out of control on the Senate, the informations about Hispania had come all by third parts, certainly Sceptius had denied these informations, so we cannot say anything certain, except he resigned. Very sad subject, I assure, since I have lived the matter.
  
 
--[[User:Lucius Arminius Faustus|Lucius Arminius Faustus]] 19:52, 6 March 2007 (CET)
 
--[[User:Lucius Arminius Faustus|Lucius Arminius Faustus]] 19:52, 6 March 2007 (CET)

Latest revision as of 18:57, 6 March 2007

I changed the wording of the ritual of New Year, because the way it was previously written, it seemed like an official ritual of the State, like the consular cerimony of 1st ianuarius, not a personal (good) initiative of the Sacedors Iani.

--Lucius Arminius Faustus 14:36, 4 January 2007 (CET)

I agree, good point. Agricola 02:45, 5 January 2007 (CET)


I changed as well what was said about Sceptius. The way it was written, it had a small compound of unwilling slander, we cannot really say ´he did this´. The situation and emotions were out of control on the Senate, the informations about Hispania had come all by third parts, certainly Sceptius had denied these informations, so we cannot say anything certain, except he resigned. Very sad subject, I assure, since I have lived the matter.

--Lucius Arminius Faustus 19:52, 6 March 2007 (CET)

Personal tools