SPQR
(link to CIL in Bersani's interview) |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
3. It is interesting to remember that classical authors did not *always* use "spqr" in a joined/pasted expression. For instance, [[Cicero]] has several times used a balanced formula like : "senatus decrevit populusque jussit", well making the difference between the two powers. [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/44799] | 3. It is interesting to remember that classical authors did not *always* use "spqr" in a joined/pasted expression. For instance, [[Cicero]] has several times used a balanced formula like : "senatus decrevit populusque jussit", well making the difference between the two powers. [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nova-Roma/message/44799] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Law and politics]] | ||
Revision as of 16:27, 29 May 2008
Professor Bersani explains states: "The expansion of [SPQR] is "Senatus Populusque Romanus", a phrase which may be translated as "the Roman Estate" that is, the whole of the civic body and its institutional system."
In support of this, Aulus Apollonius Cordus has noted "...the inscription on the temple of Saturn: Senatus populusque Romanus incendio consumptum restituit. Here we have a singular verb applied to what one would normally regard as a plural subject: the senate and the people. I wonder whether perhaps the senatus populusque is here regarded as a single entity, effectively the whole of the Roman state." [1]
Publius Memmius Albucius, Leg. Lugd. Galliae adds:
1. In most of the inscriptions that I know, containing "senatus populusque romanus", this expression is followed by a singular
- ex. 1 : Senatus / populusque / Romanus / clivom / Martis / pecunia publica / in planitiam / redigendum / curavit (CIL 06, 01270 - Rome)
- ex. 2 : Se[nat]us po[pu]lusq[ue Romanus] / c[olonia]e [O]sti[ensi]u[m mu]ro[s et port]as dedi[t] / M(arcus) [Tulliu]s C[icer]o c[o(n)s(ul) fecit carav]itqu[e] / P(ublius) Cl[odius] Pul[cher tr(ibunus) pl (ebis) co]nsumm[avit pro]b[avit] (..) (CIL 14, 04707, Ostia, Ita)
- ex. 3 : Genio deivi Iuli / parentis patriae / quem senatus / populusque / Romanus in / deorum numerum / rettulit (CIL 09, 02628 - Isernia, Samnium, Ita)
- ex. 4 : Publ]io Me[mmio Regula et] L(ucio) Fu[l]cinio Trione c[o(n)s (ulibus)] senatus populusque Iptuccitanorum [hospitium] fecit (...) (IRP Cadiz 00503, Baetica, Prado del Rey, Esp.)
2. When the plural is used, it seems to be in later inscriptions, during the late Empire, often written in african provinces and not in a very "classic" language :
- ex. Senatus p(opulus)q(ue) Lepcitanor(um) / C(aio) Macri f(ilio) C(ai) Annonis / n(epoti) Phelyssam ob colum/nas et superficie(m) et fo/rum stratum honoris / caussa [sic] decreverunt / Balitho [M]acri f(ilius) [C]o[m]/[modus](IRT 00615, Leptis magna, Trip., Libya).
3. It is interesting to remember that classical authors did not *always* use "spqr" in a joined/pasted expression. For instance, Cicero has several times used a balanced formula like : "senatus decrevit populusque jussit", well making the difference between the two powers. [2]
