Lex Salvia de intercessione (Nova Roma)

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (added <onlyinclude> tags)
(corrected comitia)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
{{LexPassed  
 
{{LexPassed  
 
   | when={{Feb 27}} {{2002}}
 
   | when={{Feb 27}} {{2002}}
   | com=comitia populi tributa  
+
   | com=comitia plebis tributa  
 
   | yes=28 | no=6 | abs=0  
 
   | yes=28 | no=6 | abs=0  
 
   }}
 
   }}

Revision as of 09:47, 26 November 2021

Praetor-logo.png This page is maintained under authority of the Praetores. Make no unauthorized changes .


Approved by comitia plebis tributa
Yes: 28 No: 6 Abs.: 0
a.d. III Kal. Mar. M. Octavio L. Sulla (II) cos. MMDCCLV a.u.c.





I. Pursuant to fulfill what is ruled in Paragraph IV.A.7.a.3 of the Constitution, this lex is enacted to define the process by which tribuni plebis may use their power of intercessio.

II. A tribunus plebis may use intercessio by making an official announcement to at least one of Nova Roma’s main communications fora (as defined by the Constitution) within 72 hours of the announcement of the item or action to be vetoed. The items and actions which tribuni plebis may use intercessio against are defined in paragraph IV.A.7.a.1 of the Constitution.

III. The issuance of intercessio shall place the item or action on hold, preventing it from being in any way effective, for 72 hours from the time at which the intercessio is announced.

IV. During this 72 hour period, other tribuni plebis may officially announce their agreement or disagreement with the particular use of intercessio.

IV.A. Such announcements shall be made to at least one of Nova Roma’s main communications fora, and shall be made to the forum in which the original announcement of intercessio occurred.
IV.B. A tribunus plebis who chooses not to state his agreement or disagreement with the use of intercessio shall be assumed to have abstained, and his abstention shall be counted neither for nor against the use of intercessio.
IV.C. The initial use of intercessio shall be assumed to be a statement of agreement with itself. Therefore, the tribunus plebis who initially issued the intercessio in question need not state his agreement with his own action.

V. Should more tribuni plebis agree than disagree with the use of intercessio in question, it shall stand, and the action which was vetoed shall be void. Otherwise, the action which was vetoed shall be allowed to take effect starting immediately at the end of the period allotted for tribuni plebis to state their agreement or disagreement.

Personal tools