Fasti MMDCCLIX

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added my research and study on the topic)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{{LanguageBar|Fasti MMDCCLIX}}{{Calendar articles}}
 
{{LanguageBar|Fasti MMDCCLIX}}{{Calendar articles}}
 
'''Official Fasti for the year {{2006}}'''. The Nundinal letter is '''C'''.
 
'''Official Fasti for the year {{2006}}'''. The Nundinal letter is '''C'''.
 +
 +
The Nundinal letter is correctly calculated from the '''H''' of last year, see the detailed background history about NR Nundinae below.
  
 
See also: "[[Calendar]]".  
 
See also: "[[Calendar]]".  
Line 15: Line 17:
  
 
*'''[http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/pontifices/2006-01-11.html Official Pontifical Calendar on the old webpage]'''
 
*'''[http://www.novaroma.org/tabularium/pontifices/2006-01-11.html Official Pontifical Calendar on the old webpage]'''
 +
 +
= PREVIOUS YEARS =
 +
 +
There is no certified information at this point, but research made by pontifex Cn. Lentulus about the past calendars and Nundinal letters of Nova Roma indicate that the Nundinal letters for previous years were the following:
 +
 +
*{{1998}}. The Nundinal letter was '''F'''. Source: http://www.novaroma.org/forum/mainlist/1999/1999-03-30.html
 +
*{{1999}}. The Nundinal letter was '''HGA'''. The year started mistakenly as '''H''', then it seems to have continued incorrectly as '''G''', and was finally amended to the correct '''A'''. Sources: http://www.novaroma.org/forum/mainlist/1999/1999-03-30.html, http://www.novaroma.org/forum/mainlist/1999/1999-08-13.html and http://www.novaroma.org/forum/mainlist/1999/1999-09-13.html Later in the year, the incorrect H was possibly corrected to an equally incorrect '''G''' (source: https://web.archive.org/web/19990210165240/http://novaroma.org/), then to the truly correct '''A''' (as shown here: https://web.archive.org/web/19991007163010/http://novaroma.org/main.html).
 +
*{{2000}}. A bissextile (or leap) year. The Nundinal letter was '''HC or AC'''.The year started mistakenly as either '''H''' or '''A''', depending on how the bissextile day was lettered back then (source: https://web.archive.org/web/20000302214803/http://www.novaroma.org/main.html), but it was changed to '''C''' at least from April (source: http://www.novaroma.org/forum/mainlist/2000/2000-04-03.html and https://web.archive.org/web/20000512015917/http://www.novaroma.org/main.html), probably continuing the mistaken H of last year, or perhaps resuming the correct calculation including the bissextile switch. It should have correctly started as '''D''' if it had continued the correct A for last year, and since it was a leap year, a switch should have occurred from D to '''C''' after the day a.d. bis VI Kal. Mar., or from C to '''B''' if we calculate it from a pre-switch C deriving from the incorrect H for last year. 
 +
*{{2001}}. The Nundinal letter was '''C''', breaking the cycle. It should have been '''F''' from C, or, less correctly, '''E''' from B. Source: http://www.novaroma.org/bin/calendar/cal?cmd=showmonth&month=9&year=2001 Another source described that this new cycle was purposedly intruduced and was derived as counted from the Declaration Day, pridie Kal. Mar. of 1998, through a virtual sequences 1998 C, 1999 F, 2000 AH, 2001 C: http://www.novaroma.org/forum/mainlist/2001/2001-10-19.html
 +
*{{2002}}. The Nundinal letter was '''F''', with regular continuance from the C of last year. It should have been '''A''' from F, or, less correctly, '''H''' from E. Source: http://www.novaroma.org/forum/mainlist/2002/2002-12-01.html
 +
*{{2003}}. The Nundinal letter can not be found for this year. The regular continuance would have been '''A''' from F, but it should have been '''D''' from A, which is the most correct lineage. There is a third possibility, '''C''' from H, which seems likely because the next year is F.
 +
*{{2004}}. A bissextile (or leap) year. The Nundinal letter was marked '''F''' (but was technically '''FE'''). It is not marked in our source, but the Nundinae must have had to fall on '''E''' after the day a.d. bis VI Kal. Mar.. The next year (marked H instead of A) certainly shows that this switch was observed. Source: http://www.novaroma.org/bin/calendar/cal?cmd=showmonth&month=1&year=2004
 +
*{{2005}}. The Nundinal letter was '''H''', with regular continuance from the FE of last year. Source: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Nova-Roma/conversations/messages/36798
 +
 +
From 2004, the Nova Roman Nundinae continue an unbroken regular cycle. If we calculated backwards from this well established cycle that has been going on from 2004 to 2017, the result for the years prior 2004 would look the following:
 +
 +
:1998 - E (it was F actually) -1 day difference from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle.
 +
:1999 - H (it was briefly H, as HGA actually) -1 day difference at least from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle.
 +
:2000 - CB (it was HC or AC actually, but should have been DC) -1 day difference at least from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle.
 +
:2001 - E (it was C actually) +2 days difference from the actual, and +1 day difference from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle (which should have been F). The cycle was then restarted as if 1998 had been C.
 +
:2002 - H (it was F actually) +2 days difference from the actual, and +1 day difference from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle (which should have been A).
 +
:2003 - C (unknown)
 +
:2004 - FE - in regular continuance up to 2017.
 +
 +
We can conclude that there have been 3 Nundinal cycles started within Nova Roma: the first in 1998, the second in 2001 and the third sometime around 2003-2004. The sequence of Nundinal letters for the 3 systems is the following:
 +
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" style="background:#ffffff"
 +
|-
 +
|Year||1st cycle<br>started in 1998||2nd cycle<br>started in 2001||3rd cycle<br>started in 2004||What it was<br>recorded
 +
|-
 +
|1998||F||C||E||'''F'''
 +
|-
 +
|1999||A||F||H||'''HGA'''
 +
|-
 +
|2000||DC||AH||CB||'''HC/AC'''
 +
|-
 +
|2001||F||C||E||'''C'''
 +
|-
 +
|2002||A||F||H||'''F'''
 +
|-
 +
|2003||D||A||C||'''-'''
 +
|-
 +
|2004||GF||DC||FE||'''F'''
 +
|-
 +
|2005||A||F||H||'''H'''
 +
|-
 +
|2006||D||A||C||'''C'''
 +
|-
 +
|2007||G||D||F||'''F'''
 +
|-
 +
|2008||BA||GF||AH||'''A'''
 +
|-
 +
|2009||D||A||C||'''C'''
 +
|-
 +
|2010||G||D||F||'''F'''
 +
|-
 +
|2011||B||G||A||'''A'''
 +
|-
 +
|2012||ED||BA||DC||'''DC'''
 +
|-
 +
|2013||G||D||F||'''F'''
 +
|-
 +
|2014||B||G||A||'''A'''
 +
|-
 +
|2015||E||B||D||'''D'''
 +
|-
 +
|2016||H||E||GF||'''GF'''
 +
|-
 +
|2017||C||H||A||'''BA'''
 +
|}

Revision as of 23:50, 17 January 2017

 Home| Latíné | Deutsch | Español | Français | Italiano | Magyar | Português | Română | Русский | English

Roman calendar


Introduction
Roman dates
Kalends - Nones - Ides
Nundinae - Feriae


·Nova Roma·
Fasti Novi Romani
Calendar for the current year
Dies atri - Market days


Annals of Nova Roma
Current events


Official Fasti for the year K. Buteone Po. Minucia cos. MMDCCLIX a.u.c.. The Nundinal letter is C.

The Nundinal letter is correctly calculated from the H of last year, see the detailed background history about NR Nundinae below.

See also: "Calendar".

Fasti MMDCCLVIII
Fasti MMDCCLIX
 
Fasti MMDCCLX


Contents


PREVIOUS YEARS

There is no certified information at this point, but research made by pontifex Cn. Lentulus about the past calendars and Nundinal letters of Nova Roma indicate that the Nundinal letters for previous years were the following:

From 2004, the Nova Roman Nundinae continue an unbroken regular cycle. If we calculated backwards from this well established cycle that has been going on from 2004 to 2017, the result for the years prior 2004 would look the following:

1998 - E (it was F actually) -1 day difference from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle.
1999 - H (it was briefly H, as HGA actually) -1 day difference at least from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle.
2000 - CB (it was HC or AC actually, but should have been DC) -1 day difference at least from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle.
2001 - E (it was C actually) +2 days difference from the actual, and +1 day difference from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle (which should have been F). The cycle was then restarted as if 1998 had been C.
2002 - H (it was F actually) +2 days difference from the actual, and +1 day difference from the original Nova Roman Nundinal cycle (which should have been A).
2003 - C (unknown)
2004 - FE - in regular continuance up to 2017.

We can conclude that there have been 3 Nundinal cycles started within Nova Roma: the first in 1998, the second in 2001 and the third sometime around 2003-2004. The sequence of Nundinal letters for the 3 systems is the following:

Year 1st cycle
started in 1998
2nd cycle
started in 2001
3rd cycle
started in 2004
What it was
recorded
1998 F C E F
1999 A F H HGA
2000 DC AH CB HC/AC
2001 F C E C
2002 A F H F
2003 D A C -
2004 GF DC FE F
2005 A F H H
2006 D A C C
2007 G D F F
2008 BA GF AH A
2009 D A C C
2010 G D F F
2011 B G A A
2012 ED BA DC DC
2013 G D F F
2014 B G A A
2015 E B D D
2016 H E GF GF
2017 C H A BA
Personal tools