Category talk:Tabularium (Nova Roma)
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
m (Inclusion of the Commentarii Pontificum) |
m (Categorisation of Leges) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I realise that this was likely by my own doing, but should we include the Commentarii Pontificum (i.e., responsa) in the Tabularium? Since they do have no legal bearing, it seems to me that they might be better placed with items on the cultus Deorum. Thoughts, anyone? [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Metellus]] 03:10, 13 November 2006 (CET) | I realise that this was likely by my own doing, but should we include the Commentarii Pontificum (i.e., responsa) in the Tabularium? Since they do have no legal bearing, it seems to me that they might be better placed with items on the cultus Deorum. Thoughts, anyone? [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Metellus]] 03:10, 13 November 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Categorisation of Leges == | ||
| + | |||
| + | In looking at the list on this category page, I think that for the sake of ease, it might be more user-friendly to categorise the leges either A) by name (e.g. lex '''Vedia''' in the 'V' part of the alphabetical list; or B) by the topic as given in the name (e.g. a ''Lex Vedia Provincialis'' would be found in the 'P' section). Any thoughts on this? [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 03:45, 12 February 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 02:47, 12 February 2007
Inclusion of the Commentarii Pontificum
I realise that this was likely by my own doing, but should we include the Commentarii Pontificum (i.e., responsa) in the Tabularium? Since they do have no legal bearing, it seems to me that they might be better placed with items on the cultus Deorum. Thoughts, anyone? Metellus 03:10, 13 November 2006 (CET)
Categorisation of Leges
In looking at the list on this category page, I think that for the sake of ease, it might be more user-friendly to categorise the leges either A) by name (e.g. lex Vedia in the 'V' part of the alphabetical list; or B) by the topic as given in the name (e.g. a Lex Vedia Provincialis would be found in the 'P' section). Any thoughts on this? Q·CAEC·MET·POST 03:45, 12 February 2007 (CET)
