<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.novaroma.org/vici/skins/common/feed.css?301"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/vici/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=Decimus_Silvius_Quadratus&amp;title=Special%3AContributions%2FDecimus_Silvius_Quadratus</id>
		<title>NovaRoma - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.novaroma.org/vici/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=Decimus_Silvius_Quadratus&amp;title=Special%3AContributions%2FDecimus_Silvius_Quadratus"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Special:Contributions/Decimus_Silvius_Quadratus"/>
		<updated>2026-04-19T04:20:16Z</updated>
		<subtitle>From NovaRoma</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.17.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_XLIIII_July_2756</id>
		<title>Session XLIIII July 2756</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_XLIIII_July_2756"/>
				<updated>2008-08-09T03:18:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Silvius Quadratus: Added div tags to denote that it shouldn't be edited.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Senate Session|Jul|25|2003}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;scriptum&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Tribunus Plebis Marcus Marcius Rex Quiritibus SPD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senate Voting Results published on July 25th 2756.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been tallied as follows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal debate began at 23.59 (17:59 EST ) Roman time, Tuesday 15 July. Voting began at 23.59 (17:59 EST ) Roman time Friday 18 July and ended at 23.59&lt;br /&gt;
(17:59 EST ) Roman time Sunday 20 July in accordance with the Senatus Consultum de ratione Senatus. A 48 hour voting time extension for the convenience of&lt;br /&gt;
Senators was originally granted by the presiding magistrate Consul Caeso Fabius Quintilianus. The results published by the presiding magistrate at 0:05&lt;br /&gt;
Roman Time, Wednesday 23 July (18:05 EST, Tuesday 22 July) on the Senate list included all votes within the extended 96 hour time limit. It was later&lt;br /&gt;
pointed out that the SC de ratione Senatus does not allow for such voting time extensions, which made all votes cast after the 48 - hour period technically&lt;br /&gt;
illegal and therefore void. As enough votes were already cast within the legal 48-hour time frame all Senatus Consulta are nonetheless valid. The Tribunes,&lt;br /&gt;
who failed to point out the illegality of the voting time extension at the time it was made, therefore suggest to the Censors to regard the late votes as&lt;br /&gt;
excused in the light of the Lex Octavia Senatoria requiring minimum activity from Senators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following 13 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to below by their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Arminius Maior (MAM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Cassius Julianus (MCJ)&lt;br /&gt;
*Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (CFQ)&lt;br /&gt;
*Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus (DIPI)&lt;br /&gt;
*Alexander Iulius Caesar Probus Macedonicus (AICPM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Titus Labienus Fortunatus (TLF)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Minucius Audens (MMA) proxy vote&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Octavius Germanicus (MOG)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Pompeius Octavianus (LPO)&lt;br /&gt;
*Gnaeus Salix Astur (GSA) proxy vote&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Sergius Australicus Obstinatus (LSAO)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Sicinius Drusus (LSD)&lt;br /&gt;
*Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato (ATMC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following Senators cast a vote, but their vote was received after voting had ended in accordance with the Senatus Consultum de ratione Senatus and&lt;br /&gt;
therefore are not included in these results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Patricia Cassia (PC)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus (LEC)&lt;br /&gt;
*Quintus Fabius Maximus (QFM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Caius Flavius Diocletianus (CFD)&lt;br /&gt;
*Antonius Gryllus Graecus (AGG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following Senator did not cast a vote [and his absence was not announced or justified in line with the Senatus Consultum defining a quorum and the LEX&lt;br /&gt;
OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaius Marius Merullus (CMM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary majority for a Senatus consultum was therefore 11 votes in favor. &amp;quot;UTI ROGAS&amp;quot; indicates a vote in favor of an item, &amp;quot;ANTIQUO&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;NEGAT&amp;quot; is a&lt;br /&gt;
vote against, and &amp;quot;ABSTINEO&amp;quot; is an open abstention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agenda items for consideration were as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item I (passed 13 in favor - 0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aedilian Fund&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been asked by the two Curule Aediles to propose the following Senatus Consultum. The Curile Aediles of last year already founded a Temple fund.&lt;br /&gt;
according to their tasks in the Constitution. This years Curule Aediles are convinced that they would like to formalize a new routine according to the&lt;br /&gt;
proposal for a Senatus Consultum below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a different text than the text that I have presented on the behalf of the Curule Aediles before and I have been told that this proposal is better&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;anchored&amp;quot; than the one before. I hereby ask the Senators to approve the following Senatus Consultum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senatus Consultum on an Aedilician Fund&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I. An Aedilician Fund for donations in favour of the projects handled by the Aediles Curules is hereby established. This fund will be maintained as part of&lt;br /&gt;
the Nova Roma bank account, rather than in a separate account, because of the following advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a. The donors can be sure that their money is kept in a safe place and that it will not be kept by the magistrate.&lt;br /&gt;
b. People can use money orders and the Nova Roma PayPal account to make donations in the same way as they pay taxes or make any other donation to Nova Roma.&lt;br /&gt;
c. It will not be necessary to transfer funds to the country in which the current Aediles Curules live.&lt;br /&gt;
d. U.S. residents will have the opportunity to deduct donations on their taxes. This wouldn't be possible if the bank account was outside USA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. The Aedilician Fund may be used only for those projects which have been previously approved by the Senate. As a consequence, it is responsibility of&lt;br /&gt;
the Aediles Curules to submit to the Senate detailed proposals for approvation. A proposal shall include as a minimum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a. detailed description of the project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b. amount of money needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c. information on those people, authorities, institutions which will get the money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No citizen can deposit funds directly into the Aedilician Fund without the Senate approving a project for which money can be donated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. Money contained in the Aedilician Fund can be used only for the purpose to which they have been expressly donated. As a consequence, there is no need&lt;br /&gt;
for the Senate to vote their allocation, as it is the will of the donors that those funds be spent for specific projects as defined by the Aediles Curules&lt;br /&gt;
and previously approved by the Senate itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IV. The Aedilician Fund is under the Aediles Curules' responsibility. A detailed record of all donations and their destinations will be kept by the&lt;br /&gt;
Quaestores assigned to the Aediles Curules. The Curule Aedilician Quaestores will also provide the Consules with quarterly reports on the Aedilician Fund&lt;br /&gt;
to be attached to the national budget of Nova Roma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V. Donors who want to make a donation to the Aedilian Fund must:&lt;br /&gt;
a. indicate that the donation is in favour of the Aedilian Fund&lt;br /&gt;
b. specify the project those money are donated for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should the donor fail to meet these conditions the donation will be considered as in favour of the Nova Roma central Treasury.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus approve the proposed Senatus Consultum above as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: UTI ROGAS. This proposal was well thought out. It is in keeping with both Nova Roma's intended 'outside project' goals, and sound financial&lt;br /&gt;
organization.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item II (passed 13 in favor – 0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Governor of Provincia Hispania&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gnaeus Salix Galaicus has been proposed as Propraetor of Hispania since the previous Propraetor has left the province and moved to Mexico. Gnaeus Salix&lt;br /&gt;
Galaicus has accepted the nomination of the Provincia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus appoint Gnaeus Salix Galaicus as Propraetor of Provincia Hispania&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: UTI ROGAS. I believe Gnaeus Salix Galacius will do a fine job as provincial governor.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item III (passed 13 in favor -0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason for new citizens to pay the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; as they as new citizens never can be late during their first year as citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
Because of this and a few citizens asking for exception from the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; I have decided to propose the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senatus Consultum about &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; for new citizens&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New cives, shall not have to pay the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; in the calendar year in which they join. This Senatus Consultum will become effective&lt;br /&gt;
immediately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus approve the above Senatus Consultum about &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; for new citizens&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: This proposal should help encourage new Citizens to gain full rights by holding Assidui status.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Silvius Quadratus</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_XLIIII_July_2756</id>
		<title>Session XLIIII July 2756</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_XLIIII_July_2756"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T16:09:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Silvius Quadratus: Made slight format modifications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Senate Session|Jul|25|2003}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tribunus Plebis Marcus Marcius Rex Quiritibus SPD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senate Voting Results published on July 25th 2756.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been tallied as follows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal debate began at 23.59 (17:59 EST ) Roman time, Tuesday 15 July. Voting began at 23.59 (17:59 EST ) Roman time Friday 18 July and ended at 23.59&lt;br /&gt;
(17:59 EST ) Roman time Sunday 20 July in accordance with the Senatus Consultum de ratione Senatus. A 48 hour voting time extension for the convenience of&lt;br /&gt;
Senators was originally granted by the presiding magistrate Consul Caeso Fabius Quintilianus. The results published by the presiding magistrate at 0:05&lt;br /&gt;
Roman Time, Wednesday 23 July (18:05 EST, Tuesday 22 July) on the Senate list included all votes within the extended 96 hour time limit. It was later&lt;br /&gt;
pointed out that the SC de ratione Senatus does not allow for such voting time extensions, which made all votes cast after the 48 - hour period technically&lt;br /&gt;
illegal and therefore void. As enough votes were already cast within the legal 48-hour time frame all Senatus Consulta are nonetheless valid. The Tribunes,&lt;br /&gt;
who failed to point out the illegality of the voting time extension at the time it was made, therefore suggest to the Censors to regard the late votes as&lt;br /&gt;
excused in the light of the Lex Octavia Senatoria requiring minimum activity from Senators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following 13 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to below by their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Arminius Maior (MAM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Cassius Julianus (MCJ)&lt;br /&gt;
*Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (CFQ)&lt;br /&gt;
*Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus (DIPI)&lt;br /&gt;
*Alexander Iulius Caesar Probus Macedonicus (AICPM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Titus Labienus Fortunatus (TLF)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Minucius Audens (MMA) proxy vote&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Octavius Germanicus (MOG)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Pompeius Octavianus (LPO)&lt;br /&gt;
*Gnaeus Salix Astur (GSA) proxy vote&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Sergius Australicus Obstinatus (LSAO)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Sicinius Drusus (LSD)&lt;br /&gt;
*Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato (ATMC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following Senators cast a vote, but their vote was received after voting had ended in accordance with the Senatus Consultum de ratione Senatus and&lt;br /&gt;
therefore are not included in these results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Patricia Cassia (PC)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus (LEC)&lt;br /&gt;
*Quintus Fabius Maximus (QFM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Caius Flavius Diocletianus (CFD)&lt;br /&gt;
*Antonius Gryllus Graecus (AGG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following Senator did not cast a vote [and his absence was not announced or justified in line with the Senatus Consultum defining a quorum and the LEX&lt;br /&gt;
OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaius Marius Merullus (CMM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary majority for a Senatus consultum was therefore 11 votes in favor. &amp;quot;UTI ROGAS&amp;quot; indicates a vote in favor of an item, &amp;quot;ANTIQUO&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;NEGAT&amp;quot; is a&lt;br /&gt;
vote against, and &amp;quot;ABSTINEO&amp;quot; is an open abstention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agenda items for consideration were as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item I (passed 13 in favor - 0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aedilian Fund&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been asked by the two Curule Aediles to propose the following Senatus Consultum. The Curile Aediles of last year already founded a Temple fund.&lt;br /&gt;
according to their tasks in the Constitution. This years Curule Aediles are convinced that they would like to formalize a new routine according to the&lt;br /&gt;
proposal for a Senatus Consultum below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a different text than the text that I have presented on the behalf of the Curule Aediles before and I have been told that this proposal is better&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;anchored&amp;quot; than the one before. I hereby ask the Senators to approve the following Senatus Consultum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senatus Consultum on an Aedilician Fund&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I. An Aedilician Fund for donations in favour of the projects handled by the Aediles Curules is hereby established. This fund will be maintained as part of&lt;br /&gt;
the Nova Roma bank account, rather than in a separate account, because of the following advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a. The donors can be sure that their money is kept in a safe place and that it will not be kept by the magistrate.&lt;br /&gt;
b. People can use money orders and the Nova Roma PayPal account to make donations in the same way as they pay taxes or make any other donation to Nova Roma.&lt;br /&gt;
c. It will not be necessary to transfer funds to the country in which the current Aediles Curules live.&lt;br /&gt;
d. U.S. residents will have the opportunity to deduct donations on their taxes. This wouldn't be possible if the bank account was outside USA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. The Aedilician Fund may be used only for those projects which have been previously approved by the Senate. As a consequence, it is responsibility of&lt;br /&gt;
the Aediles Curules to submit to the Senate detailed proposals for approvation. A proposal shall include as a minimum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a. detailed description of the project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b. amount of money needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c. information on those people, authorities, institutions which will get the money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No citizen can deposit funds directly into the Aedilician Fund without the Senate approving a project for which money can be donated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. Money contained in the Aedilician Fund can be used only for the purpose to which they have been expressly donated. As a consequence, there is no need&lt;br /&gt;
for the Senate to vote their allocation, as it is the will of the donors that those funds be spent for specific projects as defined by the Aediles Curules&lt;br /&gt;
and previously approved by the Senate itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IV. The Aedilician Fund is under the Aediles Curules' responsibility. A detailed record of all donations and their destinations will be kept by the&lt;br /&gt;
Quaestores assigned to the Aediles Curules. The Curule Aedilician Quaestores will also provide the Consules with quarterly reports on the Aedilician Fund&lt;br /&gt;
to be attached to the national budget of Nova Roma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V. Donors who want to make a donation to the Aedilian Fund must:&lt;br /&gt;
a. indicate that the donation is in favour of the Aedilian Fund&lt;br /&gt;
b. specify the project those money are donated for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should the donor fail to meet these conditions the donation will be considered as in favour of the Nova Roma central Treasury.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus approve the proposed Senatus Consultum above as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: UTI ROGAS. This proposal was well thought out. It is in keeping with both Nova Roma's intended 'outside project' goals, and sound financial&lt;br /&gt;
organization.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item II (passed 13 in favor – 0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Governor of Provincia Hispania&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gnaeus Salix Galaicus has been proposed as Propraetor of Hispania since the previous Propraetor has left the province and moved to Mexico. Gnaeus Salix&lt;br /&gt;
Galaicus has accepted the nomination of the Provincia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus appoint Gnaeus Salix Galaicus as Propraetor of Provincia Hispania&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: UTI ROGAS. I believe Gnaeus Salix Galacius will do a fine job as provincial governor.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item III (passed 13 in favor -0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason for new citizens to pay the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; as they as new citizens never can be late during their first year as citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
Because of this and a few citizens asking for exception from the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; I have decided to propose the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senatus Consultum about &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; for new citizens&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New cives, shall not have to pay the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; in the calendar year in which they join. This Senatus Consultum will become effective&lt;br /&gt;
immediately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus approve the above Senatus Consultum about &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; for new citizens&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: This proposal should help encourage new Citizens to gain full rights by holding Assidui status.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Silvius Quadratus</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_XLIIII_July_2756</id>
		<title>Session XLIIII July 2756</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_XLIIII_July_2756"/>
				<updated>2008-08-08T15:58:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Silvius Quadratus: New page: {{Senate Session|Jan|1|2001}}  Tribunus Plebis Marcus Marcius Rex Quiritibus SPD  Senate Voting Results published on July 25th 2756.  The Senate has finished its latest session and the vot...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Senate Session|Jan|1|2001}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tribunus Plebis Marcus Marcius Rex Quiritibus SPD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senate Voting Results published on July 25th 2756.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Senate has finished its latest session and the votes have been tallied as follows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal debate began at 23.59 (17:59 EST ) Roman time, Tuesday 15 July. Voting began at 23.59 (17:59 EST ) Roman time Friday 18 July and ended at 23.59&lt;br /&gt;
(17:59 EST ) Roman time Sunday 20 July in accordance with the Senatus Consultum de ratione Senatus. A 48 hour voting time extension for the convenience of&lt;br /&gt;
Senators was originally granted by the presiding magistrate Consul Caeso Fabius Quintilianus. The results published by the presiding magistrate at 0:05&lt;br /&gt;
Roman Time, Wednesday 23 July (18:05 EST, Tuesday 22 July) on the Senate list included all votes within the extended 96 hour time limit. It was later&lt;br /&gt;
pointed out that the SC de ratione Senatus does not allow for such voting time extensions, which made all votes cast after the 48 - hour period technically&lt;br /&gt;
illegal and therefore void. As enough votes were already cast within the legal 48-hour time frame all Senatus Consulta are nonetheless valid. The Tribunes,&lt;br /&gt;
who failed to point out the illegality of the voting time extension at the time it was made, therefore suggest to the Censors to regard the late votes as&lt;br /&gt;
excused in the light of the Lex Octavia Senatoria requiring minimum activity from Senators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following 13 Senators cast votes in time. They are referred to below by their initials, and are listed in alphabetical order by nomen:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Arminius Maior (MAM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Cassius Julianus (MCJ)&lt;br /&gt;
*Caeso Fabius Quintilianus (CFQ)&lt;br /&gt;
*Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus (DIPI)&lt;br /&gt;
*Alexander Iulius Caesar Probus Macedonicus (AICPM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Titus Labienus Fortunatus (TLF)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Minucius Audens (MMA) proxy vote&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus Octavius Germanicus (MOG)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Pompeius Octavianus (LPO)&lt;br /&gt;
*Gnaeus Salix Astur (GSA) proxy vote&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Sergius Australicus Obstinatus (LSAO)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Sicinius Drusus (LSD)&lt;br /&gt;
*Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato (ATMC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following Senators cast a vote, but their vote was received after voting had ended in accordance with the Senatus Consultum de ratione Senatus and&lt;br /&gt;
therefore are not included in these results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Patricia Cassia (PC)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Cornelius Sulla (LCS)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus (LEC)&lt;br /&gt;
*Quintus Fabius Maximus (QFM)&lt;br /&gt;
*Caius Flavius Diocletianus (CFD)&lt;br /&gt;
*Antonius Gryllus Graecus (AGG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following Senator did not cast a vote [and his absence was not announced or justified in line with the Senatus Consultum defining a quorum and the LEX&lt;br /&gt;
OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaius Marius Merullus (CMM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary majority for a Senatus consultum was therefore 11 votes in favor. &amp;quot;UTI ROGAS&amp;quot; indicates a vote in favor of an item, &amp;quot;ANTIQUO&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;NEGAT&amp;quot; is a&lt;br /&gt;
vote against, and &amp;quot;ABSTINEO&amp;quot; is an open abstention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agenda items for consideration were as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item I (passed 13 in favor - 0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aedilian Fund&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been asked by the two Curule Aediles to propose the following Senatus Consultum. The Curile Aediles of last year already founded a Temple fund.&lt;br /&gt;
according to their tasks in the Constitution. This years Curule Aediles are convinced that they would like to formalize a new routine according to the&lt;br /&gt;
proposal for a Senatus Consultum below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a different text than the text that I have presented on the behalf of the Curule Aediles before and I have been told that this proposal is better&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;anchored&amp;quot; than the one before. I hereby ask the Senators to approve the following Senatus Consultum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senatus Consultum on an Aedilician Fund&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I. An Aedilician Fund for donations in favour of the projects handled by the Aediles Curules is hereby established. This fund will be maintained as part of&lt;br /&gt;
the Nova Roma bank account, rather than in a separate account, because of the following advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a. The donors can be sure that their money is kept in a safe place and that it will not be kept by the magistrate.&lt;br /&gt;
b. People can use money orders and the Nova Roma PayPal account to make donations in the same way as they pay taxes or make any other donation to Nova Roma.&lt;br /&gt;
c. It will not be necessary to transfer funds to the country in which the current Aediles Curules live.&lt;br /&gt;
d. U.S. residents will have the opportunity to deduct donations on their taxes. This wouldn't be possible if the bank account was outside USA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. The Aedilician Fund may be used only for those projects which have been previously approved by the Senate. As a consequence, it is responsibility of&lt;br /&gt;
the Aediles Curules to submit to the Senate detailed proposals for approvation. A proposal shall include as a minimum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a. detailed description of the project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b. amount of money needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c. information on those people, authorities, institutions which will get the money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No citizen can deposit funds directly into the Aedilician Fund without the Senate approving a project for which money can be donated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. Money contained in the Aedilician Fund can be used only for the purpose to which they have been expressly donated. As a consequence, there is no need&lt;br /&gt;
for the Senate to vote their allocation, as it is the will of the donors that those funds be spent for specific projects as defined by the Aediles Curules&lt;br /&gt;
and previously approved by the Senate itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IV. The Aedilician Fund is under the Aediles Curules' responsibility. A detailed record of all donations and their destinations will be kept by the&lt;br /&gt;
Quaestores assigned to the Aediles Curules. The Curule Aedilician Quaestores will also provide the Consules with quarterly reports on the Aedilician Fund&lt;br /&gt;
to be attached to the national budget of Nova Roma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V. Donors who want to make a donation to the Aedilian Fund must:&lt;br /&gt;
a. indicate that the donation is in favour of the Aedilian Fund&lt;br /&gt;
b. specify the project those money are donated for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should the donor fail to meet these conditions the donation will be considered as in favour of the Nova Roma central Treasury.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus approve the proposed Senatus Consultum above as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: UTI ROGAS. This proposal was well thought out. It is in keeping with both Nova Roma's intended 'outside project' goals, and sound financial&lt;br /&gt;
organization.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item II (passed 13 in favor – 0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Governor of Provincia Hispania&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gnaeus Salix Galaicus has been proposed as Propraetor of Hispania since the previous Propraetor has left the province and moved to Mexico. Gnaeus Salix&lt;br /&gt;
Galaicus has accepted the nomination of the Provincia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus appoint Gnaeus Salix Galaicus as Propraetor of Provincia Hispania&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: UTI ROGAS. I believe Gnaeus Salix Galacius will do a fine job as provincial governor.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Item III (passed 13 in favor -0 opposed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason for new citizens to pay the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; as they as new citizens never can be late during their first year as citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
Because of this and a few citizens asking for exception from the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; I have decided to propose the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senatus Consultum about &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; for new citizens&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New cives, shall not have to pay the &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; in the calendar year in which they join. This Senatus Consultum will become effective&lt;br /&gt;
immediately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that the Senatus approve the above Senatus Consultum about &amp;quot;Late tax payment fee&amp;quot; for new citizens&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CFQ: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*GSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MMA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSA: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MAM: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*ATMC: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LPO: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*DIPI: Uti rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*AICPM: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*MOG: UTI ROGAS&lt;br /&gt;
*LSD: Uti Rogas&lt;br /&gt;
*MCJ: This proposal should help encourage new Citizens to gain full rights by holding Assidui status.&lt;br /&gt;
*TLF: UTI ROGAS&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Silvius Quadratus</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>