<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.novaroma.org/vici/skins/common/feed.css?301"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/vici/index.php?feed=atom&amp;namespace=0&amp;title=Special%3ANewPages</id>
		<title>NovaRoma - New pages [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.novaroma.org/vici/index.php?feed=atom&amp;namespace=0&amp;title=Special%3ANewPages"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Special:NewPages"/>
		<updated>2026-09-17T16:28:57Z</updated>
		<subtitle>From NovaRoma</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.17.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consilium_senatus_de_via_culturali_Europea_constituenda_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Consilium senatus de via culturali Europea constituenda (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Consilium_senatus_de_via_culturali_Europea_constituenda_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-09-02T19:38:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Minor update&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Senatus_consulta_(Nova_Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Consilium senatus de via culturali Europea constituenda  (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Consilium senatus de via culturali Europea constituenda''' (the senatorial council concerning the establishment of a European cultural route) was established under ''[[Senatus consultum de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo]]''. Also refereed to more colloquially as the &amp;quot;Senatorial European Cultural Route Establishment Committee&amp;quot;, (or &amp;quot;SECREC&amp;quot;, as an abbreviation), this council was formed to establish and sponsor an official cultural route under the &amp;quot;Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe&amp;quot; programme. More information can be found through the [https://www.coe.int/en/web/cultural-routes Cultural Routes webpage].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The concept to have Nova Roma sponsor a cultural route was first coined by [http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=17821 Sp. Ulpius Gennadius] in early {{2026}}. He reached out to the consular office and pitched his idea, which was endorsed and then presented to the senate.   &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Terms of Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council is governed by a senate approved terms of reference. The senate may update this at anytime. The council can also initiate updates to the senate for approval. The terms fo rewference describes the structure of the council and how it runs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''[[:File:Nova Roma SECREC Terms of Reference v1.0 .pdf |Nova Roma SECREC Terms of Reference, version v1.0]]''', approved {{Aug 30}} {{2026}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Council Organization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council is headed by the '''''Magister Operum''''', Program Director and Council Vice-Chair: [http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=17821 Sp. Ulpius Gennadius]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overwatching and providing guidance to the council is the '''''Praeses Consilii''''', Senatorial Committee Chair and Supervising Senator: [[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma)|D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other office holders include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''''Scriba Consilii''''', Council Secretariat: TBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''''Curator Rerum Publicarum''''', Engagement and Marketing Manager: TBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''''Curator Studiorum''''', History and Research Manager: TBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''''Sodalis Consilii''''', Ordinary Council Members: TBD.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_August_(II)_2779</id>
		<title>Session August (II) 2779</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_August_(II)_2779"/>
				<updated>2026-09-02T17:01:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: /* Session Results */ Correcting link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presiding Magistrate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma) |D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]], [[Consul]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The session was chaired by [[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma) |D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]]. The 'Call to Convene' was announced on {{Aug 18}}. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consular Auspices==&lt;br /&gt;
The auspices were taken by D. Aurelius Ingeniarius, consul, on the morning of a.d. XV Kal. Sext, Rome time. They were taken in a small garden, just 1.8km from the outer walls of the original foundations of the Augusta Taurinorum. The space provides a secluded partition to observe the sky. Under extant guidance from Cn. Corenlius Lentulus, pontifex, sacrifices and prayers were made to Iuppiter Optimus Maximus. The auspices were found to be favorable and permitted the call for the senate to proceed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consular Opening and Closing Ceremony==&lt;br /&gt;
An opening ceremony of rites and sacrifice was made by consul, D. Aurelius Ingeniarius. A closing ceremony was conducted on the afternoon, a.d. III Kal. Sext, by consul, D. Aurelius Ingeniarius, located in Torino, Italia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quorum==&lt;br /&gt;
The senate has 23 voting members registered. In accordance with article XI.E. of the Senatus consultum de ratione senatus MMDCCLXV, no senator is deemed absent as no senator has lodged their pending absence on this forum. As per article I, 2/3 of registered members constitutes a quorum; this is 16 members. With 23 of 23 members accounted for, quorum is achieved. The 23 voting members are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*D. Aurelius Ingeniarius, '''consul''', ''presiding magistrate, senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Caecilius Metellus Tocaiensis, '''consul''', ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*L. Calpurnius Bestia, '''praetor'''&lt;br /&gt;
*D. Claudius Aquilinus, '''praetor'''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Aurelius Cotta Iovius, '''censor''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Petronius Stephanus Turpilianus, '''censor''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*Fl. Vedius Germanicus, princeps senatus, ''senator censorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Sex. Lucilius Tutor, ''senator censorius&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Arrius Nauta, '''decemvir stlitibus iudicandis''', ''senator censorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*T. Domitius Draco, ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Cornelius Cethegus Barosus, ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*P. Aurelius Barbatus, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Flavius Constantinus Aeneas Stilicho, ''senator consularis''          &lt;br /&gt;
*M. Hortensia Maior Fabiana Faustina, ''senatrix praetoria''&lt;br /&gt;
*P. Porcius Licinus, curator aerarii, ''senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ti. Iulius Nerva, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Vitellius Celsus, ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Iulius Paterculus, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, '''triumvir monetalis''', ''princeps iuventutis, senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Octavius Corvus, '''triumvir monetalis''', ''senator tribunicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ap. Curius Rullus, ''senator tribunicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Ocratius Maximus Gittus, '''tribunus militum comitiatus''', ''senator quaestorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Sibylla Fulvia Ambrosia, ''senatrix privata''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following 5 tribuni plebis who are not senators themselves have the right to attend this meeting of&lt;br /&gt;
the Senate and are invited to participate therein:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ti. Horatius Barbatus, '''tribunus plebis''' &lt;br /&gt;
*M. Claudius Marcellus, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Flavius Hugo Capito, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Valeria Terra, '''tribuna plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
:{|border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1315  Rome Time (CET)  {{Aug 18}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(18 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to convene. As seen in the time stamp of the post message.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1330 Rome Time (CET)  {{Aug 18}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(18 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to order. Debate period commences and lasts until needed. Debate is allowed to continue during voting.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2030 Rome Time (CET) {{Aug 26}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(26 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to vote. Debate is allowed to continue during voting.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2030 Rome Time (CET) {{Aug 30}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(30 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Voting period closes. No further voting or discussion is permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2030 Rome Time (CET) {{Aug 31}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(31 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to close. Call to close made before this time.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agenda==&lt;br /&gt;
:{|border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM I&lt;br /&gt;
|Opening Address&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item not for vote. Discussion only.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM II&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the establishment of the Senate Council on the establishment of a European Cultural Route. &lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM III&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the legion established outside the province for Provincia Pannonia.&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM IV&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the authority of the Curator of the Treasury to establish a bank account.&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM V&lt;br /&gt;
|Hearing of the report of the Canadian Merger Activity.&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item not for vote. Discussion only.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposal Results==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM II - Senatus consultum de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 8 (DAI, CnCL, FlVG, AIP, PPL, DCA, LCB, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::AIP: While I agree with the overall goals of this measure and am therefore voting in favor, I do have concerns over two sections of the Mandatum Consilii. First, section II.C., &amp;quot;External Engagement&amp;quot;: it seems fine to me if a subsidiary group own by Nova Roma does not have as close a focus on reconstructing exact Roman organizational structures as does our organization itself, especially if it furthers other aspects of our goals and is designed for non-Nova Romans to easily understand who does what. What we should absolutely avoid is a situation in which people interacting with our group or a subsidiary thereof do not understand that they are interacting with us or misunderstand the nature/goals of our organization (at least if they care). While surely no subterfuge is intended here, we should be maximally transparent so that no one who joins forces with us or contributes money to a project we sponsor later has cause to feel misinformed. I don't think that anything in the Mandatum Consilii requires we be less than fully transparent (hence why I am still voting for it), but I am raising the issue so we keep in mind e.g. if new social media accounts are created, they should clearly state somewhere visible that they are affiliated with us. Second, section V.D.iii.(1) has the Praefectus Rei Publicae Administrandae assuming the relevant supervisory obligations if the office of Praeses is vacated. There is nothing wrong with this in principle, but as we all seem to be in agreement that our current Praefectus Rei Publicae Administrandae, Gn. Cornelius Lentulus, is highly overworked, it seems that granting him additional obligations is something we would want to avoid. Hopefully this situation will not arise, but, if it does, we should make an effort to see a new Praeses appointed as soon as possible. Apologies for raising these concerns after the window for modifications had passed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 1 (TiIN)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 14 (MACI, MHMFF, CCCB, AVC, CFCAS, TDD, QAN, MCMT, CPST, PAB, AOMG, MOC, SxLT, ACR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM III - Senatus consultum de legione extra provinciam pro provincia Pannonia constituta'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 9 (DAI, CnCL, FlVG, AIP, PPL, TiIN, DCA, LCB, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::AIP: It makes sense both that governors should not generally be able to recruit legions outside their own provinces and that we should make an exception where there is a personal relationship which makes one person or provincial administration an ideal contact between a given legion and Nova Roma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 14 (MACI, MHMFF, CCCB, AVC, CFCAS, TDD, QAN, MCMT, CPST, PAB, AOMG, MOC, SxLT, ACR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM IV - Senatus consultum de potestate curatoris aerarii rationem argentariam constituendi'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 9 (DAI, CnCL, FlVG, AIP, PPL, TiIN, DCA, LCB, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 14 (MACI, MHMFF, CCCB, AVC, CFCAS, TDD, QAN, MCMT, CPST, PAB, AOMG, MOC, SxLT, ACR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Session Results==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Senators who did not vote in this session: MACI, MHMFF, CCCB, AVC, CFCAS, TDD, QAN, MCMT, CPST, PAB, AOMG, MOC, SxLT, ACR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;95%&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;background:#993333; text-align:center; color:#ffffff;&amp;quot;  | Item nb.&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;background:#993333; text-align:center; color:#ffffff;&amp;quot;  | Item title&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | I&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | II&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de legione extra provinciam pro provincia Pannonia constituta (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de legione extra provinciam pro provincia Pannonia constituta]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | III&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de potestate curatoris aerarii rationem argentariam constituendi (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de potestate curatoris aerarii rationem argentariam constituendi]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Senate sessions (Nova Roma)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_Consulta_In_Force</id>
		<title>Senatus Consulta In Force</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_Consulta_In_Force"/>
				<updated>2026-08-21T11:25:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding new SCs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{LanguageBar|Legal system (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Legal system (Nova Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nova Roma]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--Bes sure to use &amp;quot;&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&amp;quot; in the actual senatus consulta for this to work. Just around the main body text of the SC themselves.--&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
This is a consolidated page of all ''senatus consulta'' currently '''In Force''', for Nova Roma. The pages is a useful means to search efficiently through all the active ''senatus consulta'' for a particular element or subject of interest (use ''Ctrl-F'' to bring up the browser 'Find' feature). This page does not include those SC that are considered &amp;quot;Lapsed&amp;quot;; those senatus consulta for one off events, announcements or appointments or organisational structuring that has been made obsolete by more recent legislation, or otherwise that have no ongoing legislative effect. This page will include senatus consulta that issue awards, and current titles or responsibilities, as they have an ongoing affect in census points or other permanent implications.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
To see senatus consulta presented in chronological order, with their respective senate reports, you can browse this [[:Category:Senatus consulta (Nova Roma)| senate session record]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Page last updated: {{Sep 2}} {{2026}} - Page covers decrees from {{2020}} (2020) to {{2026}} (2026). &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Aug 30}} {{2026}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de legione extra provinciam pro provincia Pannonia constituta===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de legione extra provinciam pro provincia Pannonia constituta (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de potestate curatoris aerarii rationem argentariam constituendi===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de potestate curatoris aerarii rationem argentariam constituendi (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Aug 10}} {{2026}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de clarificatione senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de clarificatione senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de provinciis servandis aut amittendis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de provinciis servandis aut amittendis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de Legione XXIV Media Atlantia traducenda===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de Legione XXIV Media Atlantia traducenda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{May 30}} {{2026}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de officio auxilii civilis Novae Romae abolendo===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de officio auxilii civilis Novae Romae abolendo (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de conventibus publicis abrogando===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de conventibus publicis abrogando (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de exemptione temporaria a relatione rationum publicarum hoc anno===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de exemptione temporaria a relatione rationum publicarum hoc anno (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de curatore aerarii creando===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de curatore aerarii creando (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de tabulis tributorum===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de tabulis tributorum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Jan 30}} {{2026}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de tributis perpetuis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de tributis perpetuis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de foro ordinationis retis publici constituendo===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de foro ordinationis retis publici constituendo (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de quaestoribus aerariis constituendis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de quaestoribus aerariis constituendis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de cura insignis sive logotypi macronationalis Novae Romae iterum constituenda===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de cura insignis sive logotypi macronationalis Novae Romae iterum constituenda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de Senatus Consulto Ultimo obsoleto de situ internetuali Novae Romae abrogando===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de Senatus Consulto Ultimo obsoleto de situ internetuali Novae Romae abrogando (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Oct 7}} {{2025}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de relationibus praesidum provinciarum===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus Consultum De Relationibus Praesidum Provinciarum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de relatione rationum publicarum===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus Consultum De Relatione Rationum Publicarum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de initiativa reformationis situs Novae Romae===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus Consultum De Initiativa Reformationis Situs Novae Romae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de programmate praesentiae in mediis socialibus===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus Consultum De Programmate Praesentiae In Mediis Socialibus (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus Consultum De Vestimentis Et Instrumentis Publicis Novae Romae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de Municipio Novae condendo===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus Consultum De Municipio Novae Condendo (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Dec 30}} {{2024}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de provinciis, imperiis et triumphis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de provinciis, imperiis et triumphis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{May 30}} {{2024}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de provinciis examinandis et ordinandis annis C. Cethego Q. Arrio coss. et M. cotta C. Petronio coss.===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de provinciis examinandis et ordinandis annis C. Cethego Q. Arrio coss. et M. cotta C. Petronio coss. (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{May 9}} {{2024}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de funere censorio A. Tulliae Scholasticae Augustae===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de funere censorio A. Tulliae Scholasticae Augustae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Apr 20}} {{2024}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de quibusdam praemiis censualibus clarificandis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de quibusdam praemiis censualibus clarificandis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de legionibus sustentandis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de legionibus sustentandis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Dec 27}} {{2023}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de pecunia publica castris Ovo Danda===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de pecunia publica castris Ovo Danda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de commissionibus senatus===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de commissionibus senatus (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de praemio senatorio Ti. Iulii Nervae===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de praemio senatorio Ti. Iulii Nervae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum on the senate award for shaping the first quarter of century of Nova Roma (Nova Roma)===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum on the senate award for shaping the first quarter of century of Nova Roma (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de A. Tullia Scholastica Augusta===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de A. Tullia Scholastica Augusta (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de laudibus et praemio D. Autroniae Stolonis et L. Delli Liberalis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de laudibus et praemio D. Autroniae Stolonis et L. Delli Liberalis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Oct 14}} {{2023}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de colonia Aquincum deducenda===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de colonia Aquincum deducenda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de sodalitate Barbarica approbanda===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de sodalitate Barbarica approbanda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Apr 6}} {{2023}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de regione Noveboracensi dissolvenda et regione Novocaesariensi creanda et de admonitione de nominibus rectis adhibendis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de regione Noveboracensi dissolvenda et regione Novocaesariensi creanda et de admonitione de nominibus rectis adhibendis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de imperio C. Flavii Constantini Aeneae Stilichonis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de imperio C. Flavii Constantini Aeneae Stilichonis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Nov 15}} {{2022}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de provinciis examinandis et ordinandis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de provinciis examinandis et ordinandis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de praesidibus provinciarum===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de praesidibus provinciarum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de laudibus et praemio C. Aureli Barbati===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de laudibus et praemio C. Aureli Barbati (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de relatione annua Rei Publicae Cenomanicae===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de relatione annua Rei Publicae Cenomanicae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Feb 27}} {{2022}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum ultimum de Provincia Scythia et Russia===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum ultimum de Provincia Scythia et Russia (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de relatione provinciali requirenda===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de relatione provinciali requirenda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de pietate, fiducia et fidelitate principum civitatis erga rem publicam===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de pietate, fiducia et fidelitate principum civitatis erga rem publicam (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de Re Publica Canadana Romana internationali===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de Re Publica Canadana Romana internationali (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Dec 31}} {{2021}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de victoria belli civilis, de salutatione imperatoria et de triumpho===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de victoria belli civilis, de salutatione imperatoria et de triumpho (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum ultimum de re publica restituenda===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum ultimum de re publica restituenda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de corona civica Cn. Lentulo et P. Licino danda===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de corona civica Cn. Lentulo et P. Licino danda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Jul 31}} {{2021}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum ultimum de pietate, fiducia et fidelitate principum civitatis erga rem publicam revisum (Nova Roma)===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum ultimum de pietate, fiducia et fidelitate principum civitatis erga rem publicam revisum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de sodalitatum restitutione===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de sodalitatum restitutione (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de Regione Cenomania Provinciae Novae Britanniae, de praefecto Cenomaniae et de legato Regionis Noveboracensis et de castris vicisque aedificandis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de Regione Cenomania Provinciae Novae Britanniae, de praefecto Cenomaniae et de legato Regionis Noveboracensis et de castris vicisque aedificandis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Jun 20}} {{2021}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de provinciis Dacia et Lacibus Magnis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de provinciis Dacia et Lacibus Magnis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum ultimum de foro Novo Romano officiali, de foris publicis et de limitibus iuris publici===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum ultimum de foro Novo Romano officiali, de foris publicis et de limitibus iuris publici (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de Canali Twitch Novae Romae===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de Canali Twitch Novae Romae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de translatione identitatum provinciarum===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de translatione identitatum provinciarum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senatus consulta of {{Oct 7}} {{2020}}==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de provinciis ordinandis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de provinciis ordinandis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum ultimum de rectoribus provinciarum===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum ultimum de rectoribus provinciarum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum de Cn. Cornelio Lentulo Alexandro patre patriae===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum de Cn. Cornelio Lentulo Alexandro patre patriae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Senatus consultum ultimum de curatoribus publicis===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Include summary|:Senatus consultum ultimum de curatoribus publicis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_de_Legione_XXIV_Media_Atlantia_traducenda_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Senatus consultum de Legione XXIV Media Atlantia traducenda (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_de_Legione_XXIV_Media_Atlantia_traducenda_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-08-19T10:47:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding &amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt; tags&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Senatus_consulta_(Nova_Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Senatus consultum de Legione XXIV Media Atlantia traducenda (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=2|lexstat=|com=|yes=|no=|abs=|when=|scstat=1|scyes=18|scno=0|scabs=1|scwhen={{Aug 11}} {{2026}}|guideone=Provincia America Noveboracensis et Mediatlantica (Nova Roma)|guidetwo=Legio XXIV Media Atlantia (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I. With the sad passing of the praefectus legionis, senator Gallio Velius Marsallas, the Legio XXIV Media Atlantia, stationed in Provincia America Noveboracensus et Mediatlantica, the First Legion of Nova Roma established at the time of the founding Nova Roma, remained without unit commander and manager. The senate wishes to save this legion from dissolution and oblivion, and to honor its almost three decades of history. Much of the equipment of the legion was bought by our other legion, Legio IV Victrix, which was also founded in Mediatlantica, by partners of the Legio XXIV Media Atlantia, but moved to our Provincia California.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. Therefore the senate decrees that the Legio XXIV Media Atlantica shall be reassigned to Provincia California, shall be merged with the Legio IV Victrix, a separate unit, but embodied and represented by the same legionaries, put under the commander of Legio IV Victrix, and shall be under the imperium of whichever governor is responsible for the territory covered by the area that is currently called Nova Roma's Provincia California.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. Legio IV shall remain responsible to continue Legio XXIV Media Atlantia, and honor the flag, name and traditions of Legio XXIV Media Atlantia and Gallio Velius Marsallas, and provide Nova Roma with events, occasions, as they deem possible, where the flag and name of the Legio XXIV Media Atlantia is present and honored.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_de_provinciis_servandis_aut_amittendis_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Senatus consultum de provinciis servandis aut amittendis (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_de_provinciis_servandis_aut_amittendis_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-08-19T10:43:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding &amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt; tags&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Senatus_consulta_(Nova_Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Senatus consultum de provinciis servandis aut amittendis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=2|lexstat=|com=|yes=|no=|abs=|when=|scstat=1|scyes=16|scno=2|scabs=1|scwhen={{Aug 11}} {{2026}}|guideone=Provincia (Nova Roma)|guidetwo=Governor (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I. If any past evaluation of the provinces, or if the evaluation of provinces in the year of consulship of M. Metellus and D. Aurelius, would cause the effect of automatic loss of a province, the following provinces shall be excepted and shall incur the following effects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I.A. Provinces in the United States of America, Provincia America Transmississippiana, Provincia Nova Britannia and Provincia Lacus Magni shall not be lost for the time being, but shall continue as they are.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I.B.1. The following provinces in the United States of America, Provincia America Hispanica, Provincia California, Provincia America Noveboracensis et Mediatlantica and Provincia America Cismississippiana, after the official declaration of the loss of province, shall immediately automatically be reincorporated into the structure of the American provinces effective on the following Kalends after the senatus consultum of provincial evaluation has taken force. The reason for this is not to let them disappear leaving an empty hole in the map of the Nova Roman empire. They shall undergo merger instead of permanent dissolution because of the principle of the Nova Roman provincial system that one country should be entirely incorporated as a province, either one or more provinces, and parts of a country may not be left out of Nova Roma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I.B.2. On the next Kalends, Provincia America Hispanica and Provincia California, if lost by Nova Roma, shall be reincorporated and merged into Provincia America Transmississippiana as regiones, Regio America Hispanica and Regio California, respectively. Similarly, Provincia America Noveboracensis et Mediatlantica and Provincia America Cismississippiana shall merge into Provincia Nova Britannia as regiones. If America Noveboracensis et Mediatlantica were not lost and to be merged, but America Cismississippiana would, then Cismississippiana shall be merged into Noveboracensis et Mediatlantica. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I.C. Provincia Sarmatia, Dacia, Marcomannia, Canada, Brasilia and Nova Hispania shall be exempt from the procedure of loss to Nova Roma, and shall continue as they are, for the time being. Their status shall be reconsidered at the provincial evaluation which comes after the next.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. Regardless of the official time table and deadlines of provincial evaluations and reports to be submitted, the evaluation of provinces is considered having taken place and happened if, and only if, the presiding magistrate has introduced this as an item on the senate agenda, published the provincial reports during session as part of the item, and declared which ones were not submitted, and the senate has examined the reports, and an official senatus consultum was enacted. Likewise, any effect of the provincial evaluations (marks, labels, dissolution etc.) may occur if, and only if the senatus consultum communicating these effects have been duly enacted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. In the interpretation of the required number of gathering citizens in the provincial evaluation, as definded by the Senatus consultum de provinciis ordinandis, cives Novi Romani optimo iure, cives Novi Romani sine suffragio and cives Latini can be counted and included, until the evaluation held this year. From the next year on, only cives Novi Romani optimo iure.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_de_clarificatione_senatus_consultum_de_vestimentis_et_instrumentis_publicis_Novae_Romae_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Senatus consultum de clarificatione senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_de_clarificatione_senatus_consultum_de_vestimentis_et_instrumentis_publicis_Novae_Romae_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-08-19T10:40:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: adding &amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt; tags&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Senatus_consulta_(Nova_Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Senatus consultum de clarificatione senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=2|lexstat=|com=|yes=|no=|abs=|when=|scstat=1|scyes=16|scno=3|scabs=0|scwhen={{Aug 11}} {{2026}}|guideone=Toga|guidetwo=Tunica}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I. Article III of the Senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae shall be modified to include these sentences at the end of the Article III:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The committee established by this senatus consultum shall be called Senate Committee for Public Vestments and Equipment Development, its Latin name shall be Commissio Senatus ad Vestimenta et Instrumenta Publica Procuranda. The co-chairs lead the committee not by a capacity of a new office, but by their capacity as proconsul (consul), and as praefectus rei publicae et praetorio and provincial proquaestor (or quaestor), called to central duty. Senators D. Aurelius Ingeniarius and P. Aurelius Barbatus are appointed as third and fourth members in their capacity as senator. The committee can spend money for the purpose described in this SC, but all members of the committe must approve each expenditure unanimously, and the Officium Aerarii shall also approve the expenditure if an item has a price higher than a 1000 USD. After such an official decision, payment may be made by the curator aerarii or any of the two quaestores aerarii. The committee shall not receive a budget to spend before a financial report of the aerarium publicum is heard by the senate. The senate shall allocate a budget to spend after it heard the treasury report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. Article V shall be modified to include these sentences at the end of the Article V:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Until a different decision is made, if ever, the Commissio Senatus ad Vestimenta et Instrumenta Publica Procuranda shall also undertake this task, reporting to the Officium Operum Publicorum.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_August_2779</id>
		<title>Session August 2779</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_August_2779"/>
				<updated>2026-08-19T10:30:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding new page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presiding Magistrate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Marcus Caecilius Metellus Tocaiensis (Nova Roma) |M. Caecilius Metellus Tocaiensis]], [[Consul]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The session was chaired by [[Marcus Caecilius Metellus Tocaiensis (Nova Roma)|M. Caecilius Metellus Tocaiensis]]. The 'Call to Convene' was announced on {{Aug 1}}. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consular Auspices==&lt;br /&gt;
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, pontifex, took the auspices for consul  M. Caecilius Metellus Tocaiensis in his name, and they were favorable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consular Opening and Closing Ceremony==&lt;br /&gt;
The opening and closing ceremony of rites and sacrifice were made by pontifex Cn. Lentulus in the name of the consul M. Metellus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quorum==&lt;br /&gt;
The senate has 23 voting members registered. In accordance with article XI.E. of the Senatus consultum de ratione senatus MMDCCLXV, no senator is deemed absent as no senator has lodged their pending absence on this forum. As per article I, 2/3 of registered members constitutes a quorum; this is 16 members. With 23 of 23 members accounted for, quorum is achieved. The 23 voting members are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*D. Aurelius Ingeniarius, '''consul''', ''presiding magistrate, senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Caecilius Metellus Tocaiensis, '''consul''', ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*L. Calpurnius Bestia, '''praetor'''&lt;br /&gt;
*D. Claudius Aquilinus, '''praetor'''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Aurelius Cotta Iovius, '''censor''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Petronius Stephanus Turpilianus, '''censor''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*Fl. Vedius Germanicus, princeps senatus, ''senator censorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Sex. Lucilius Tutor, ''senator censorius&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Arrius Nauta, '''decemvir stlitibus iudicandis''', ''senator censorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*T. Domitius Draco, ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Cornelius Cethegus Barosus, ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*P. Aurelius Barbatus, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Flavius Constantinus Aeneas Stilicho, ''senator consularis''          &lt;br /&gt;
*M. Hortensia Maior Fabiana Faustina, ''senatrix praetoria''&lt;br /&gt;
*P. Porcius Licinus, curator aerarii, ''senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ti. Iulius Nerva, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Vitellius Celsus, ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Iulius Paterculus, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, '''triumvir monetalis''', ''princeps iuventutis, senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Octavius Corvus, '''triumvir monetalis''', ''senator tribunicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ap. Curius Rullus, ''senator tribunicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Ocratius Maximus Gittus, '''tribunus militum comitiatus''', ''senator quaestorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Sibylla Fulvia Ambrosia, ''senatrix privata''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following 5 tribuni plebis who are not senators themselves have the right to attend this meeting of&lt;br /&gt;
the Senate and are invited to participate therein:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ti. Horatius Barbatus, '''tribunus plebis''' &lt;br /&gt;
*M. Claudius Marcellus, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Flavius Hugo Capito, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Valeria Terra, '''tribuna plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
:{|border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2145  Rome Time (CET)  {{Aug 1}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(1 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to convene. As seen in the time stamp of the post message.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2150 Rome Time (CET)  {{Aug 1}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(1 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to order. Debate period commences and lasts until needed. Debate is allowed to continue during voting.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2140 Rome Time (CET) {{Aug 7}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(7 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to vote. Debate is allowed to continue during voting.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2140 Rome Time (CET) {{Aug 10}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(10 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Voting period closes. No further voting or discussion is permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|0648 Rome Time (CET) {{Aug 11}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(11 Aug 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to close. Call to close made before this time.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agenda==&lt;br /&gt;
:{|border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM I&lt;br /&gt;
|Setting a spending limit on the general permission of the C. Flavius Stilicho's proconsular committee developing Nova Roma &lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM II&lt;br /&gt;
|Clarifying procedural steps of implementing the effects that take place after hearing the provincial reports postponed so far &lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM III&lt;br /&gt;
|Transfering Legio XXIV Media Atlantica from Provincia Noveborancensis et Mediatlantica to Provincia California.&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposal Results==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM I - Senatus consultum de clarificatione Senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 16 (DAI, MCMT, LCB, DCA, MACI, CPST, FlVG, TDD, CCCB, PAB, CFCAS, MHMFF, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, AOMG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DAI: The committee changes are agreeable and the action to review our public finances first is a great approach. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::CnCL: I requested the consul, in private, to table the proposal in its orginal form. Although I didn't change my opinion, I agree that all inquiries of all senators have to be answered thoroughly, and even a praetor demanded this. They must receive all information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DCA: I thank Senators Lentulus and Barbatus for their considerable service to Nova Roma. Receiving that comprehensive financial report is definitely a long overdue step in the right direction for transparency and I look forward to see also a detailed proposal regarding the tent &amp;amp; furnishings, including cost estimates and safeguards. A major theme of my previous messages is that we should be able to make an informed decision when voting on huge tax payer funded expenditures, and I appreciate that we will be getting closer to that. Regarding the other topic of extremely expensive tax payer funded togas &amp;amp; tunics, I remain completely unconvinced however that is not in this specific vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::FlVG: While I am pleased the text was changed at the last minute, if and when this matter comes up again, I will need a lot of convincing to spend a large percentage of our treasury on reenactment supplies that will only benefit a handful of people and whose concrete benefit to Nova Roma as a whole has not been explained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::AIP: Since the modified version of this proposal affords us some extra time before the final decision on expenditures is made, it might be a good idea to share the arguments on both sides with the broader group of citizens and see what they think.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::PAB: I appreciate the compromise here and am working as fast as communication allows go get the relevant information from the treasury staff to make a preliminary financial report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::TDD: I approve of this alteration to the proposal, but I question direction we are going.  We are meant to be modern Romans, living today.  We should be focusing on infrastructure that benefits all Nova Romans, the website for starters.  Perhaps an accountant (familiar with Maine nonprofit law) to get our financials in proper order to get us on track for the future. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 3 (SxLT, QAN, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::SxLT: I am disappointed for the lack of consistency from you consul. We were promised these steps of development and I served as consul and military tribune with consular power for three years altogether. Did I do these for nothing? I did in my capacity what I could so we can have NR reach the point when we are out there and we have our own camp version of the City State of Nova Roma. I signed up for these kinds of things when I joined after reading the Declaration. I understand the consul just wanted to honor democracy here, but we honor democracy so long we will forget that we are an organization created to do things. We are not a platonic republic to play legal formulas but a history organization. I saw civil wars, I fought one as a leader, but I didn't expect to see we are afraid just to function so we can please everyone. I will not believe in NR seriously anymore unless I see our organization has its real assets and uses them for going out and host our Roman community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 4 (PPL, MOC, ApCR, AOMG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM II - Senatus consultum de provinciis servandis aut amittendis'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 16 (MCMT, LCB, DCA, MACI, CPST, SxLT, QAN, CCCB, PAB, CFCAS, MHMFF, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::CnCL: This gives some time to reconsider a couple of questions, but after all, it was high time that inactive provinces be called upen, and their status as a province be revoked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DCA: I think more can be done to strengthen or reactivate provinces, including finding and assisting governor candidates willing &amp;amp; able to serve. But in this agenda item, merging inactive provinces makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::PAB: I think out current province system needs a major overhaul, but that is a discussion for another day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 2 (FlVG, TDD)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::FlVG: I fear that once a defunct province is absorbed into another one, there will be no incentive to ever restore it to independence. Most of the provinces in North America are already too large to effectively serve their citizens. This will only exacerbate the problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::TDD: I am not a fan of merging provinces.  Most are too large as-is.  Merging hasn't improved anything anywhere we have done it.  Maybe we need to instead look into why activity, retention, and recruitment is low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 1 (DAI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DAI: I won't block this measure but I did want to highlight how unwieldy our provincial evaluation system has become. Through no fault of their own, very few senators here (let alone the governors themselves) could accurately recall with sufficient detail all the legislation that governs the administration of our provinces and what provinces have reported what and when. This decree is the latest attempt to temporarily band-aid a failing system. Part of the issue is the lack of &amp;quot;local&amp;quot; governors, a lack of mentoring and training, and burdening the busiest people in the Republic with multiple governorships. I urge the senate to consider addressing the underlying issues here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 4 (PPL, MOC, ApCR, AOMG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM III - Senatus consultum de Legione XXIV Media Atlantia traducenda'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 18 (DAI, MCMT, LCB, DCA, MACI, CPST, SxLT, QAN, FlVG, CCCB, PAB, CFCAS, MHMFF, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::CnCL: May our legion continue to live, and with them, the memory of the commander Gallio Velius Marsallas!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 1 (TDD)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 4 (PPL, MOC, ApCR, AOMG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Session Results==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Senators who did not vote in this session: PPL, MOC, ApCR, AOMG.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;95%&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;background:#993333; text-align:center; color:#ffffff;&amp;quot;  | Item nb.&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;background:#993333; text-align:center; color:#ffffff;&amp;quot;  | Item title&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | I&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de clarificatione senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de clarificatione Senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | II&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de provinciis servandis aut amittendis (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de provinciis servandis aut amittendis]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | III&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de Legione XXIV Media Atlantia traducenda (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de Legione XXIV Media Atlantia traducenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Senate sessions (Nova Roma)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Legio_XXI_Rapax_Canadana_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Legio XXI Rapax Canadana (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Legio_XXI_Rapax_Canadana_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-07-14T20:18:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Rapax Canadana We Want You.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Legio XXI Rapax Canadana was a group of dedicated individuals whose goal was to bring to life the military and civilian aspects of life in ancient Rome. The Legio XXI Rapax was based out of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The Legio XXI Rapax Canadana was established within Nova Roma by Senatus Consultum on {{Jul 3}} {{2004}}. It was founded in 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Legio XXI Rapax (Nova Roma)|Another Rapax legion]] was recruited to Nova Roma a year later, in {{2005}}, in Provincia Pannonia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian Rapax legion of Nova Roma was disbanded in {{2007}}. The [[Legio XXI Rapax (Nova Roma)|Pannonian Rapax]] of Nova Roma continued to grow and is flourishing in Pannonia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The designation &amp;quot;Canadana&amp;quot; was added to the name within Nova Roma to distinguish the legion from the [[Legio XXI Rapax (Nova Roma)|Legio XXI Rapax &amp;quot;Pannonica&amp;quot;]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legio data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Commander: Caeso Maximius Tiberius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Website: [https://web.archive.org/web/20030415061522/http://www.leg-xxi.org/ www.leg-xxi.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rapax Canadana bonfire.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Provincia Canada Ulterior (Nova Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reenactments]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Relatio_de_consilio_senatus_de_via_culturali_Europea_constituendo</id>
		<title>Relatio de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Relatio_de_consilio_senatus_de_via_culturali_Europea_constituendo"/>
				<updated>2026-07-11T19:36:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding tabularium box&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Senatus_consulta_(Nova_Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Senatus consultum de consilio senatus de via culturali Europea constituendo (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=2|lexstat=|com=|yes=|no=|abs=|when=|scstat=1|scyes=8|scno=1|scabs=0|scwhen={{Aug 30}} {{2026}}|guideone=|guidetwo=}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''A senatorial decree concerning the establishment of the Senate Council on the establishment of a European Cultural Route.''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I. Nova Roma has identified an opportunity to expand our involvement in research, archeology, and engagement with community on the matter of ancient Roman history through the &amp;quot;Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe programme&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. This senatus consultum hereby establishes the &amp;quot;Consilium Senatus de Via Culturali Europea Constituenda&amp;quot; (the senatorial council concerning the establishment of a European cultural route), refereed to more colloquially as the &amp;quot;Senatorial European Cultural Route Establishment Committee&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;SECREC&amp;quot;, as an abbreviation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. The structure of this committee is established under the Term of Reference, ''Mandatum Consilii'' (included as an annex to this sentatus consultum). By approving this senatus consultum, the senate approves the structure and remit of this committee. As required by this document, the senate affirms the appointment of key accountable managers, as per the mandatum consilii:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. Magister Operum, Program Director and Committee Vice-Chair: Spurius Ulpius Genadius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:B. Praeses Consilii, Senatorial Committee Chair/Supervising Senator: Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IV. The senate enforces that the committee is only authorized to carryout its objectives under an approved Project Management Plan (PMP). This senatus consultum authorizes any current or future consuls to approve revisions (after the first instance) of the PMP, under edictum. Any changes requiring increases to budget or new legal contracts must be presented to the senate.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Relatio_de_potestate_curatoris_aerarii_rationem_argentariam_constituendi</id>
		<title>Relatio de potestate curatoris aerarii rationem argentariam constituendi</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Relatio_de_potestate_curatoris_aerarii_rationem_argentariam_constituendi"/>
				<updated>2026-07-11T16:44:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding tabularium box&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Senatus_consulta_(Nova_Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Senatus consultum de potestate curatoris aerarii rationem argentariam constituendi (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=2|lexstat=|com=|yes=|no=|abs=|when=|scstat=1|scyes=9|scno=0|scabs=0|scwhen={{Aug 30}} {{2026}}|guideone=Nova Roma Taxes|guidetwo=Aerarium Publicum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''A senatorial decree concerning the authority of the Curator of the Treasury to establish a bank account.''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I. Previously under the ''senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum'', the curator aerarii was tasked with opening a European bank account. Activating article VI of that decree, the curator has submitted a recommendation to the senate (Annex A) to proceed with a &amp;quot;Wise Business&amp;quot; account. The senate accepts his recommendation and acknowledges that it meets the intent of the ''senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. To facilitate the opening of a Wise Business account, the senate (the Nova Roma board of directors) authorizes the curator aerarii (Nova Roma chief treasurer), Publius Aurelius Barbatus (Mr Preston Sangster) to act in the name of Nova Roma Inc. to open a Wise Business account. Authorized access to this new account is granted by the senate to those already established as treasury officers under Nova Roma law, supporting the curator. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Annex A to senatus consultum de potestate curatoris aerarii rationem argentariam constituendi'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Statement of the Curator Aerarii concerning the establishment of a euro-denominated treasury account'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patres conscripti,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum directs the curator aerarii to establish a European-based bank account in the name of Nova Roma, Inc. The purpose of the account is to allow citizens to pay taxes in euros through the Single Euro Payments Area, using a euro-denominated account that accepts transfers without fees and imposes no continuing costs, or only minimal costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have examined the practical, legal, administrative, and financial implications of carrying out this instruction through a conventional European bank. I have also examined Wise Business as an alternative means of achieving the same operational result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion is that a traditional European bank account may be legally possible, but it would likely impose a substantial administrative burden upon Nova Roma without any guarantee that a bank would accept the application. Wise Business would require meaningful corporate verification, but the process is materially simpler and would functionally accomplish the purpose of the decree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Establishing a conventional European bank account&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nova Roma, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation incorporated in the State of Maine. Opening a foreign bank account would not alter its corporate domicile or create a new European legal entity. The account would remain an asset of Nova Roma, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The practical difficulty is that Nova Roma is a United States corporation without a conventional branch, office, employee, or established business operation in a European jurisdiction. Many European banks decline applications from foreign organizations unless they can demonstrate a substantial local connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even where local law does not formally prohibit a nonresident corporation from holding an account, an individual bank may require a local address, branch registration, tax number, resident officer, employee, commercial activity, or other evidence of an operational connection to the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The appointment of an authorized magistrate residing in Europe would assist with identification, correspondence, local attendance, and account administration, but it would not by itself establish Nova Roma’s eligibility. The bank would still have to verify Nova Roma as the actual customer and establish that the magistrate was legally authorized to act on behalf of the corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The account could not properly be opened as the personal account of a magistrate and then used informally for Nova Roma’s funds. Such an arrangement would create unacceptable risks of commingling, loss of corporate control, uncertainty concerning ownership, and dependence upon the continued cooperation of the individual account holder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any account must be titled in the name of Nova Roma, Inc., with the magistrate or treasury officer acting only as an authorized representative, administrator, or signatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Institutional terminology and explanation of activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nova Roma’s governmental and constitutional terminology does not correspond directly with the terminology used by ordinary banks and corporate compliance departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bank may not understand automatically the role of a consul, curator aerarii, quaestor aerarii, treasury account manager, or the Senate. These offices would have to be explained in conventional corporate terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curator aerarii may be described as the corporation’s authorized treasury officer. A quaestor aerarii or treasury account manager may be described as an authorized account administrator or signatory. The consuls may need to be identified according to whatever formal corporate authority they exercise under Nova Roma’s corporate documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “tax” would also require explanation. Nova Roma’s taxes are internal assessments or membership payments made by the citizens of a private nonprofit corporation. They are not governmental taxes imposed through the sovereign authority of a state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bank would need a clear explanation that Nova Roma seeks to receive modest annual organizational payments from citizens in Europe and elsewhere, and that those funds are to be used solely for the lawful administrative and nonprofit purposes of Nova Roma, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Documents likely required by a conventional European bank&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exact requirements would vary by country and institution, but Nova Roma should expect a conventional foreign bank to request substantially all of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Articles or certificate of incorporation for Nova Roma, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
2. Any amendments to the articles of incorporation.&lt;br /&gt;
3. A current certificate of existence or certificate of good standing from the State of Maine.&lt;br /&gt;
4. Nova Roma’s Employer Identification Number confirmation.&lt;br /&gt;
5. The Internal Revenue Service determination letter, if Nova Roma possesses recognized federal tax-exempt status.&lt;br /&gt;
6. Current corporate bylaws.&lt;br /&gt;
7. Nova Roma’s constitution or other governing instruments where necessary to explain the relationship between the Senate, board, consuls, and treasury officers.&lt;br /&gt;
8. A current list of directors.&lt;br /&gt;
9. A current list of principal corporate officers.&lt;br /&gt;
10. A description of Nova Roma’s governance structure.&lt;br /&gt;
11. An organizational chart identifying the persons who exercise ultimate control over the corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
12. A formal board resolution authorizing the opening of the account.&lt;br /&gt;
13. A resolution identifying the selected bank, or authorizing the curator aerarii to select an institution.&lt;br /&gt;
14. A resolution naming the person authorized to submit the application.&lt;br /&gt;
15. A resolution naming each authorized signatory.&lt;br /&gt;
16. A resolution naming each person permitted to use online banking or administrative controls.&lt;br /&gt;
17. A resolution establishing whether transactions above a certain amount require more than one approval.&lt;br /&gt;
18. The applicable senatus consultum authorizing the euro account.&lt;br /&gt;
19. A formal letter from a consul confirming the Senate’s decision and the authority granted to the curator aerarii or other designated representative.&lt;br /&gt;
20. A power of attorney authorizing the local magistrate or treasury account manager to act for Nova Roma, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
21. Notarized copies of resolutions, powers of attorney, signatures, or other documents where required.&lt;br /&gt;
22. Apostilles authenticating Maine corporate records, notarizations, powers of attorney, or resolutions where required.&lt;br /&gt;
23. Certified translations into the language of the selected bank’s jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
24. Government-issued identification for the curator aerarii.&lt;br /&gt;
25. Government-issued identification for each authorized signatory.&lt;br /&gt;
26. Government-issued identification for each director, controlling officer, or other person the bank treats as exercising ultimate control.&lt;br /&gt;
27. Residential addresses for all persons subject to verification.&lt;br /&gt;
28. Proof of residence for those persons.&lt;br /&gt;
29. Dates and places of birth.&lt;br /&gt;
30. Citizenship and tax-residence information.&lt;br /&gt;
31. Tax-identification numbers for directors, officers, signatories, or controllers where required.&lt;br /&gt;
32. A completed Form W-9 or other certification of Nova Roma’s United States tax status.&lt;br /&gt;
33. Any FATCA self-certification required by the bank.&lt;br /&gt;
34. Any Common Reporting Standard self-certification required by the bank.&lt;br /&gt;
35. A description of Nova Roma’s nonprofit purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
36. A description of its activities.&lt;br /&gt;
37. A description of its citizenship or membership system.&lt;br /&gt;
38. An explanation of the internal tax or dues system.&lt;br /&gt;
39. An explanation of why a euro-denominated account is required.&lt;br /&gt;
40. An estimate of the number of transactions expected each month or year.&lt;br /&gt;
41. An estimate of the average and maximum balance.&lt;br /&gt;
42. An estimate of the average size of individual payments.&lt;br /&gt;
43. A list of the principal countries from which payments are expected.&lt;br /&gt;
44. An explanation of the source of funds.&lt;br /&gt;
45. An explanation of the expected use and destination of funds.&lt;br /&gt;
46. Recent treasury reports or financial statements.&lt;br /&gt;
47. Recent statements from Nova Roma’s existing United States bank accounts and payment platforms.&lt;br /&gt;
48. Recent annual filings or federal information returns, including Form 990 or the applicable alternative, if requested.&lt;br /&gt;
49. Evidence of Nova Roma’s physical or mailing address in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
50. Evidence of the authorized representative’s address in the European jurisdiction, if required.&lt;br /&gt;
51. Evidence of a substantial connection to the selected country, if required by the bank.&lt;br /&gt;
52. A local tax number, company registration number, branch registration, or other local identifier, if required.&lt;br /&gt;
53. A description of the controls that prevent misuse of the account.&lt;br /&gt;
54. A description of the persons responsible for reconciling the account.&lt;br /&gt;
55. A description of the controls governing outgoing transfers.&lt;br /&gt;
56. A description of the procedure for removing former officers and transferring access to successors.&lt;br /&gt;
57. Declarations concerning beneficial ownership or ultimate control, notwithstanding that Nova Roma has no shareholders.&lt;br /&gt;
58. Declarations concerning politically exposed persons, sanctions, or related compliance matters.&lt;br /&gt;
59. Any additional documents requested by the bank to establish the legitimacy, purpose, and expected operation of the account.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preparing this package could require coordination among the curator aerarii, consuls, board, corporate secretary, and proposed European account manager. It could also require notarization, apostilles, translation, foreign legal advice, and personal attendance at a bank branch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even after these steps were completed, the bank might still refuse the application because Nova Roma lacks a sufficient local economic or organizational presence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
United States reporting, tax, and accounting implications&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A conventional foreign bank account would create additional United States reporting responsibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the aggregate maximum value of Nova Roma’s foreign financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any point during a calendar year, Nova Roma would generally be required to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts on FinCEN Form 114.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
United States citizens or residents with signature authority over the account may also have individual FBAR obligations, even though the funds belong to Nova Roma rather than to them personally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The foreign account may also require disclosure on Nova Roma’s annual federal information return. Depending upon the nature and scale of Nova Roma’s foreign activities, Schedule F may also become relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the account would not ordinarily determine whether the underlying receipts are taxable. Their treatment would depend upon what the payments represent, such as membership dues, contributions, program revenue, or another category of receipt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nova Roma’s accounts and federal filings would remain denominated in United States dollars. The treasury would therefore need a consistent method for recording euro receipts, conversion fees, year-end balances, and currency gains or losses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending upon the country selected, Nova Roma could also face foreign withholding on interest, requests for tax-residence documentation, or other local reporting requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A foreign bank account by itself would not ordinarily create a taxable branch or permanent establishment, but the answer could change if Nova Roma also maintained an office, employed local personnel, conducted substantial local business, or authorized a representative habitually to bind the corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nova Roma’s nonprofit or tax-exempt status in the United States would not automatically confer charitable status in another country. The account should therefore not be represented as authorizing local tax-deductible charitable receipts unless Nova Roma separately qualified under local law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Governance and control concerns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A foreign account should not depend solely upon one individual magistrate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nova Roma should avoid any arrangement in which access or recovery depends entirely upon a magistrate’s personal telephone number, private email account, home address, continued tenure, or willingness to cooperate after leaving office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The account should be titled only in the name of Nova Roma, Inc. At least two appropriate officers should possess administrative visibility or recovery authority. Institutional email addresses should be used where possible. Statements should be preserved in a central treasury archive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Substantial outgoing transfers should require more than one approval where the institution permits it. Each account user’s authority should be documented and limited. There should be a written procedure for the immediate transfer or termination of access when an officer resigns, is removed, or completes a term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise Business as an alternative&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise Business offers a substantially simpler means of accomplishing the operational purpose of the decree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Wise Business account may be established under the verified legal name of Nova Roma, Inc. Once approved, Nova Roma may receive individual euro account details, maintain a euro-denominated balance, and accept payments through the SEPA system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise also supports multiple account users, differentiated access levels, payment approvals, transaction records, statements, and controlled account administration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would allow Nova Roma to receive euro tax payments through ordinary European transfer methods without requiring the corporation to establish a foreign branch, obtain a European corporate registration, maintain a local office, or build a traditional banking relationship in a country where it has no substantial business operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise would still require meaningful verification. It is not an anonymous or informal service. Nova Roma would have to prove its legal existence, identify its directors and controller, verify the applicant, explain its activities, document its address, establish the source of funds, and demonstrate the applicant’s authority to act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference is that the Wise process is designed for remote international business onboarding and relies primarily upon records Nova Roma should already possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise Business verification requirements&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise does not use one fixed document list for every applicant. It first attempts to verify the organization electronically and then requests additional evidence where necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nova Roma should be prepared to provide:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Its full legal name, entity type, EIN, registered address, operating address, and a description of its activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Articles of incorporation, amendments, a current Maine certificate of existence or good standing, bylaws, and IRS documentation where requested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The names, dates of birth, countries of residence, and identification details of directors and the person Wise treats as exercising ultimate control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Government-issued identification and proof of address for the person opening the account.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. A board resolution, authorization letter, or power of attorney confirming that the applicant may open and administer the account on behalf of Nova Roma, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Proof that the Tennessee address listed in Maine’s corporate records is the organization’s genuine registered and administrative address.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. A clear explanation of Nova Roma’s activities, its citizen tax system, the purpose of the euro account, the expected number and value of payments, and the countries from which payments are expected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Evidence of the source of funds, such as bank statements, PayPal statements, treasury reports, payment ledgers, tax-rate legislation, or other financial records.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nova Roma should prepare these records in advance but submit only those documents specifically requested by Wise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Wise process still requires meaningful verification, but it relies primarily on existing United States corporate records and can ordinarily be completed remotely. Unlike a conventional European bank, Wise would not normally require Nova Roma to establish a European branch, obtain local corporate registration, retain a local office, secure apostilles or certified translations, or attend a foreign branch in person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparison of administrative burden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise does not eliminate compliance obligations. Nova Roma would still have to prove its identity, governance, address, authority, activities, and source of funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The administrative difference is nevertheless substantial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A conventional European bank may require the same core corporate records together with apostilles, notarizations, certified translations, local tax numbers, branch registration, evidence of a commercial connection to the country, local legal advice, and personal attendance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise would ordinarily allow Nova Roma to complete the process remotely with existing United States corporate records.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise would not normally require Nova Roma to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- establish a European branch;&lt;br /&gt;
- obtain a foreign corporate registration;&lt;br /&gt;
- retain a local office;&lt;br /&gt;
- obtain a local tax number solely for the account;&lt;br /&gt;
- translate its entire corporate record;&lt;br /&gt;
- attend a foreign bank branch in person; or&lt;br /&gt;
- demonstrate a substantial business operation in the bank’s country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a small international nonprofit seeking only to receive modest euro-denominated payments, this difference is significant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Functional compliance with the decree&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise Business is not a conventional European deposit account opened directly with a traditional bank.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should therefore not be represented without qualification as being identical to the specific institutional form named in the decree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the narrowest possible interpretation, the words “European-based bank account” may be read as requiring a direct relationship with a conventional European bank.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise may not satisfy that literal description.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does, however, satisfy the substantive and operational requirements of the decree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise would permit Nova Roma to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- establish an account under the verified legal name of Nova Roma, Inc.;&lt;br /&gt;
- maintain funds denominated in euros;&lt;br /&gt;
- provide European euro receiving details;&lt;br /&gt;
- accept standard SEPA transfers;&lt;br /&gt;
- receive payments from European citizens without requiring costly international bank wires;&lt;br /&gt;
- avoid or minimize continuing account fees;&lt;br /&gt;
- maintain transaction records and statements;&lt;br /&gt;
- assign controlled access to treasury officers;&lt;br /&gt;
- establish approval procedures for outgoing payments;&lt;br /&gt;
- convert euros into dollars where necessary; and&lt;br /&gt;
- transfer funds into Nova Roma’s principal United States treasury account.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the practical objectives the decree was intended to accomplish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between Wise and a conventional European bank is therefore principally one of institutional form, not operational result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recommendation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recommend that the Senate recognize Wise Business as a reasonable and substantially compliant means of carrying out the senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This recommendation does not claim that Wise is technically identical to a conventional European bank account. It acknowledges that Wise meets the spirit, purpose, and functional requirements of the decree while differing from the narrowest possible reading of its wording.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the Senate wishes to remove uncertainty, it may clarify that the decree is satisfied by a regulated business payment account that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. is established under the verified legal name of Nova Roma, Inc.;&lt;br /&gt;
2. maintains or records funds in euros;&lt;br /&gt;
3. provides individual European receiving details;&lt;br /&gt;
4. accepts standard SEPA transfers;&lt;br /&gt;
5. permits citizens to pay without disproportionate international transfer costs;&lt;br /&gt;
6. imposes no continuing fees, or only minimal continuing fees;&lt;br /&gt;
7. provides reliable records and statements;&lt;br /&gt;
8. allows controlled access by duly authorized treasury officers; and&lt;br /&gt;
9. preserves Nova Roma’s ownership and control of the funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such a clarification would preserve the substantive protections and purpose of the law while permitting the treasury to use a modern financial service appropriate to Nova Roma’s actual circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless the Senate determines that maintaining a conventional deposit account at a European bank is itself an indispensable objective, the documentation, cost, delay, and risk of rejection associated with that approach appear disproportionate to the limited purpose for which the account is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wise Business presents the more practical course. It would allow Nova Roma to receive tax payments in euros through SEPA, under its own corporate identity, with appropriate records and internal controls, while imposing substantially less administrative overhead upon the treasury, the consuls, the corporate board, and the appointed account managers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For these reasons, I recommend that the Senate authorize or acknowledge Wise Business as fulfilling the operational requirements and legislative purpose of the decree.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Legio_II_Augusta_Australis_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Legio II Augusta Australis (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Legio_II_Augusta_Australis_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-07-10T16:02:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Moving this legion to it's own page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Legio II Training Session.jpg|600px|thumb|right|Legio II Augusta training session in Canberra, Australian Capital Territory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Legio II Augusta''' of [[Provincia Australia (Nova Roma)|Provincia Australia]] is an Allied Military Reenactment Unit of Nova Roma. Legio II was proclaimed a partner of Nova Roma on {{Nov 20}} {{2024}} by [[Provincia Australia (Nova Roma)|Provincia Australia]] governor, [[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma)|D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]], under [[Provincia_Australia_-_Praetorium_(Nova_Roma)#Edictum_77.01_-_Edictum_propr.C3.A6torium_de_societate_cum_legione_II_Augusta_Australiana|Edictum proprætorium de societate cum legione II Augusta Australiana]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Legio II Vex.jpg|85px|thumb|left|Vex of Legio II Augusta.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Legio II Augusta is a detachment of '''[https://www.nmrg.com.au/ National Military Reenactment Group (NMRG)]''', an incorporated Australian not-for-profit organization based in Canberra, Australia. The legion was founded in {{2018}} to coincide with a large gathering of Australian Roman reenactors  supporting an ancient Roman exhibit at the National Museum of Australia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The partnership with Legio II is documented within the [[:File:MoU Between Nova Roma and NMRG - Online.pdf|Memorandum of Understanding between Nova Roma and the National Military Reenactment Group]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Visit the Legion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*National Military Reenactment Group (Website): [https://www.nmrg.com.au/ https://www.nmrg.com.au/]&lt;br /&gt;
*National Military Reenactment Group (Facebook): [https://www.facebook.com/AGWANSWACT https://www.facebook.com/AGWANSWACT]&lt;br /&gt;
*Email: [mailto:potts4259@yahoo.com.au potts4259@yahoo.com.au]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Command ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ceremonial supreme commanders of all legions within Nova Roma are the ''[[Consul (Nova Roma)|consules]]'' of Nova Roma, and the ''[[Praetor (Nova Roma)|praetores]]'' are the vice-supreme commanders. The provincial ceremonial commander-in-chief of the Legio II Augusta (and all other legionary units in Provincia Australia), is the [[Governor (Nova Roma)|governor]] of [[Provincia Australia (Nova Roma)|Provincia Australia]], the praetor [[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma)|D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The actual commander of the allied Legio II Augusta, as the highest-ranking officer within the legion, the centurio [[Tiberius Valerius Martialis (Nova Roma)|Ti. Valerius Martialis]]. He exercises command in conjunction with his subordinate operational commanders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Officers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State Generals (political officers of the republic):&lt;br /&gt;
* '''praetor''' - [[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma)|D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Legionary Officers:&lt;br /&gt;
* '''centurio''' – [http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=17543 Ti. Valerius Martialis] (first officer of the legion)&lt;br /&gt;
* '''optio''' – [http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/album?id=17549 C. Terentius Petronianus Gracchus Scipio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Legionaries, Auxiliaries and Civilians:&lt;br /&gt;
* '''legionarius''' – [http://www.novaroma.org/civitas/manage/edit?id=17596 Q. Titinius Annalis]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''legionarius''' – [[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma)|D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Legio II Queanbeyan Medieval Fair 2024.jpg|800px|thumb|center|Legio II Augusta hosts three other Australian-based legions in the largest gathering of Roman reenactors at the Queanbeyan Medieval Fair {{2024}}.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Provincia Australia (Nova Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reenactments]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Rogatio_Aurelia_de_rogatoribus_creandis_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Rogatio Aurelia de rogatoribus creandis (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Rogatio_Aurelia_de_rogatoribus_creandis_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-07-08T07:53:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: adding tabularium box&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Leges (Nova Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Lex Aurelia de facultate relationum ad senatum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=1|lexstat=3|com=comitia centuriata|yes=10|no=8|abs=0|when={{Sep 7}} {{2026}}|guideone=Rogator (Nova Roma)|guidetwo=Censor (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Aurelian Law concerning the appointment of rogators.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I. Historically, the office of rogator has been restricted only to those who work in the censorial office. The nature and duties of rogator requires them to access specific data to aid in the development of voting roles, as well as data to aid in the breaking of voting ties in elections. This also meant having to have access to systems that also held Personal Identifiable Information (PII) of our citizens. With the development of new, more accessible record keeping that excludes PII, the once previous restriction is no longer required and is considered unnecessarily restrictive.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. This law is only intended to be an amending law and is not intended to be standalone law. It is intended to only modify the ''lex Tullia de comitiis habendis'' and does not rescind it. As this has law affects how comitia operates internally through the variance in rogator appointment, it will require senate ratification in accordance with article V.F. of the lex Cornelia Domitia de re publica constituenda.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. With this law, article II.C.1.a. of the ''lex Tullia de comitiis habendis'' is amended to read as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The duties of the rogatores are to ask the citizens to vote by advertising the voting in any and all venues of communication, to assist citizens in the voting procedure, to answer their questions in connection to the technical and procedural aspects ongoing voting, to identify and to register the voters by centuries or tribes, and to pass the anonymous list of votes by centuries and tribes to the diribitores for counting. For the sake of tiebreaking, the rogatores shall provide the citizenship date and the birthdate of all candidates to the diribitores. The rogatores shall have access both to the cista and relevant accessible censorial records in order to fulfil their duties. If the censorial records are considered to be inadequate or otherwise restricted due to the presence of sensitive citizen data (personal identifiable information), then only officers of the Censorial Office may be appointed to this position. One of the rogatores can be appointed as custos. There shall be at least one rogator. Candidates for censorship, consulship, praetorship and plebeian tribuneship may not serve as rogatores.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Relatio_de_legione_extra_provinciam_pro_provincia_Pannonia_constituta_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Relatio de legione extra provinciam pro provincia Pannonia constituta (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Relatio_de_legione_extra_provinciam_pro_provincia_Pannonia_constituta_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-07-05T17:44:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding tabularium box&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Senatus_consulta_(Nova_Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Senatus consultum de legione extra provinciam pro provincia Pannonia constituta (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=2|lexstat=|com=|yes=|no=|abs=|when=|scstat=1|scyes=9|scno=0|scabs=0|scwhen={{Aug 30}} {{2026}}|guideone=Governor (Nova Roma)|guidetwo=Roman Reenactment Army of Nova Roma}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''A senatorial decree concerning the legion established outside the province for Provincia Pannonia.''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I. The senate acknowledges the investigation by the consuls under ''edictum consulare de legionibus extra provincias constitutis'', concerning the establishment of a legion outside the legal boundaries of provincia Pannonia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. The senate concurs with the position of the consular edict going forwards, concerning interpretation of the lex Aurelia de legionibus and the lex Aurelia de familiis gladiatoriis et ludis gladiatoriis with respect to the ability of governors raising or establishing new units. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. The senate instructs the consuls to present an amending law to the people through the comitia, to address the ability for magistrates to present edicta from the distant past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IV. Acknowledging the relationship developed through the provincial governor, the senate hereby places Legio VI Herculia under the direct command and imperium of the governor of provincia Pannonia for two years from the date of the enactment of this senatus consultum. In this period, the senate should evaluate the viability of a new province or an expansion to provicia Pannonia. The governor of provincia Pannonia is instructed to cultivate activity in the region of the province to promote future independent administration. If the senate has not enacted a decision by the expiry of this time period, then the legion will automatically return under the direct command and imperium of the consuls. In the future, if a new province encompassing the legion is established or if the borders of another province is expanded to encompass the area of the legion, then the legion is automatically assigned under the imperium of the responsible governor, even without explicit remarks of the senate.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Rogatio_Aurelia_de_valore_edictorum_publicatorum_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Rogatio Aurelia de valore edictorum publicatorum (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Rogatio_Aurelia_de_valore_edictorum_publicatorum_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-07-05T17:21:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding tabularium box.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Vetoed rogationes (Nova Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Lex Vedia de assiduis et capite censis (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=1|lexstat=4|com=comitia centuriata |yes=0|no=0|abs=0|when={{Aug 28}} {{2026}}|vetomag=[[Marcus Claudius Marcellus (Nova Roma)|Marcus Claudius Marcellus]]|mag=[[Tribunus plebis (Nova Roma)|Tribunus plebis]]|guideone=|guidetwo=}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The Aurelian law concerning the validity of published edicts.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I. The lex Vedia de ratione edictorum has formed the basis of edict law for many years in Nova Roma. The law appreciated the decentralized nature of Nova Roman society and government and sought to ensure that all enacted edicta was published publicly within a given period of time to ensure understanding and compliance. Despite the administrative requirement of 72-hours to publish edicta, it did not specify the validity of those edicta posted beyond that time frame, or those even not posted at all. As a result, a precedence has developed where various magistrates can claim an issued edict to be valid from months or even years in the past. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. This law is intended to only be an amendment law and is not designed to be a standalone law. This law only applies amendments to the lex Vedia de ratione edictorum. The enactment of this law will only modify the basis of the lex Vedia de ratione edictorum and does not rescind it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. Appreciating the past intent of the lex Vedia and noting the validity of an edict from the moment of issue, sperate from the moment of publication, this lex makes the following modifications to the lex Vedia de ratione edictorum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. Article I is to to be replaced in toto with the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I. As described in the Constitution, the activities of magistrates in the furtherance of their official activities shall, in large part, take place through the issuance of edicta (edicts). Edicta are considered valid and actionable at the time they are issued by an approved authority. Edicta shall be publicly published within a set timeframe in order to maintain their validity from the moment of issuance (if prior to the moment of publication). A failure to publicly publish an edict within a set time renders the edict invalid and reversed. Depending on the office, edicta must be published in the following timeframes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::A. Edicta by all central magistrates and senate-appointed officers with the ius edicendi: within 72-hours of issuance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::B. Edicta by all governors of provinces: within two nundinae of issuance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:B. A new article (II) is to be created following the above article I and is to read as follows. The proceeding article is to be renumbered as article (III):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::II. For an edict to be published publicly, it must be published to at least one of the following public fora within 72-hours of their issuance: the officially sponsored email list, or the officially sponsored internet message board. All such edicta shall be posted in the Nova Roma tabularium by the curator rei informaticae as soon as practical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:C. The first sentence of article III is to have the following edition added to the first sentence:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;...by those legally empowered to do so by the constitution or as otherwise stipulated in law.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:D. A new article (IV) is to be created following the extant article III and is to read as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IV. Extensions to publication timeframes as stipulated in article I in this lex may be sought by magistrates and governors only with explicit approval of the senate prior to the publication of the edictum. Upon being provided sufficient evidence, the senate only can endorse past issued edicta as valid to the following maximum timeframes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::A. Edicta by all central magistrates and senate-appointed officers with the ''ius edicendi'': up to 3 months from issuance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::B. Edicta by all governors of provinces: up to 12 months from original issuance.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Germania_-_Geschichte</id>
		<title>Provincia Germania - Geschichte</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Provincia_Germania_-_Geschichte"/>
				<updated>2026-06-24T18:33:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Numerius Curtius Flamma: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br style=&amp;quot;clear:both&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;genericbox&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:240px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;font-variant:small-caps&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:180%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[DE:Provincia Germania (Nova Roma)|Provincia Germania]]'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:120%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[DE:Provincia Germania - Praetorium (Nova Roma)|PRAETORIUM ]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:120%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Provincia Germania - Geschichte|GESCHICHTE ]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:120%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[DE:Provincia Germania - Events (Nova Roma)|EVENTS]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:120%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Provincia Germania - Map &amp;amp; Guide (Nova Roma)|KARTE &amp;amp; INFOS]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:120%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.facebook.com/groups/germania.novaroma.org FORUM]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Die '''Provinz Germania''' wurde an den '''{{Feb 1}} {{2000}}''' (1. Februar 2000) neu gegründet.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Seitdem standen ihr folgende Personen als Gouverneure vor:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gouverneure der Provinz Germania===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1. [[Marcus Marcius Rex (Nova Roma)|M. Marcius Rex]], '''''Propraetor'''''&lt;br /&gt;
: berufen {{Jan 1}} {{2000}} &lt;br /&gt;
: Amtszeit bis {{Mar 11}} {{2001}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 2. [[Caius Flavius Diocletianus (Nova Roma)|C. Flavius Diocletianus]], '''''Propraetor'''''&lt;br /&gt;
: berufen {{Mar 11}} {{2001}} &lt;br /&gt;
: Amtszeit bis {{Mar 17}} {{2005}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 3. [[Marcus Flavius Philippus Conservatus (Nova Roma)|M. Flavius Philippus Conservatus]], '''''Propraetor''''', '''''Legatus pro Praetore'''''&lt;br /&gt;
: berufen {{Apr 1}} {{2005}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Amtszeit bis {{Mar 31}} {{2006}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 4. [[Titus Flavius Aquila (Nova Roma)|T. Flavius Aquila]], '''''Legatus pro Praetore'''''&lt;br /&gt;
: berufen {{Dec 20}} {{2007}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Amtszeit bis {{Mar 5}} {{2010}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 5. [[Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Alexander (Nova Roma)|Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Alexander]], '''''Proconsul'''''&lt;br /&gt;
: berufen {{Jan 19}} {{2017}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Amtszeit bis {{Jun 16}} {{2020}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 6. [[Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus (Nova Roma)|Cn. Cornelius Lentulus]], '''''Dux und Legatus pro Praetore'''''&lt;br /&gt;
: berufen {{Oct 7}} {{2020}}&lt;br /&gt;
: ''derzeit im Amt''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Provincia Germania (Nova Roma)|History of Germania]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Numerius Curtius Flamma</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Paula_Gratia_Stephana_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Paula Gratia Stephana (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Paula_Gratia_Stephana_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-06-22T14:25:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{BioHeader|name=Paula Gratia Stephana|id=4940}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Paula Gratia Stephana''', a patrician citizen, was a provincial procuratrix of [[Provincia Mediatlantica (Nova Roma)|Mediatlantica]] and the beloved wife of [[Gnaeus Equitius Marinus (Nova Roma)|Cn. Equitius Marinus]], mother of their two daughters, Equitia Marina Gratiana and Equitia Marina Alia. Gratia Stephana passed away on {{Oct 12}} {{2012}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was originally known as Paulina Gratidia Equitia, member of the Nova Roman patrician gens Equitia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Digital bust of Paula Gratia Stephana.jpg|center|frame|Digital bust created in memory of Paula Gratia Stephana by his husband Cn. Equitius Marinus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Offices held==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Procurator (Nova Roma)|Procuratrix Provinciae Mediatlanticae]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{2006}} - {{2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Legatus (Nova Roma)|Legata Provinciae Mediatlanticae ad censum]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{2003}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scriba (Nova Roma)|Scriba Provinciae Mediatlanticae]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{2003}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deceased citizens]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Rogatio_Aurelia_de_candidatis_cognoscendis</id>
		<title>Rogatio Aurelia de candidatis cognoscendis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Rogatio_Aurelia_de_candidatis_cognoscendis"/>
				<updated>2026-06-05T11:02:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding tabularium box&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Leges (Nova Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Lex Aurelia de facultate relationum ad senatum (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=1|lexstat=3|com=comitia centuriata|yes=10|no=8|abs=0|when={{Sep 7}} {{2026}}|guideone=|guidetwo=}}&lt;br /&gt;
''The Aurelian law concerning the identification of candidates''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I. Historically defined under consular edicta, the requirement for election candidates to have a current profile photo on their Album Civium record seeks to build integrity and trust. In our predominately online society, it can be difficult to discern who is behind the identity of those running for office and place trust in those who you cannot see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. This law is intended to only be an amendment law and is not designed to be a standalone law. This law only applies amendments to the ''lex Salvia de prorogatione et cumulatione'' and the ''lex Tullia annalis''. The enactment of this law will supersede the ''edictum consulare de imaginibus candidatorum et magistratuum'' and the ''edictum consulare de poenis magistratuum edictum violantibus'', making them obsolete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. The following amendments are made to the ''lex Tullia annalis'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. A new article (II) is to be inserted after article I. All other articles are to be renumbered accordingly. The new article II shall be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Each candidate for any administrative office, magistracy, or priesthood shall have submitted a present citizen ID photo to their Album Civium record. The ID photo must:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::A. Be less than 10 years old (applicable to new photos only).&lt;br /&gt;
:::B. Be unmodified and not created by artificial intelligence (AI).&lt;br /&gt;
:::C. Not modified by image filters or photo-editing software that distorts colour, background, or the clear appearance of the face. &lt;br /&gt;
:::D. Show the citizen wearing Roman dress or garb, appropriate to their rank, or otherwise wearing modern clothing that is at least &amp;quot;smart-casual&amp;quot; in appearance. &lt;br /&gt;
:::E. Clearly show the full face (wearing of a headdress that does not obscure the eyes, nose or mouth is still acceptable). &lt;br /&gt;
:::F. Not contain any writing (this excludes writing seen on approved vexillia or Roman group advertising). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IV. The following amendments are made to the ''lex Salvia de prorogatione et cumulatione'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. A new article (III.D.) is to be inserted after article III.C:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No individual shall present a candidacy for a magistracy unless his or her Album Civium record contains a current citizen ID photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:B. A new article (IV.D.) is to be inserted after article IV.D:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Any citizen without a current citizen ID photo on his or her Album Civium record, provided they have submitted one before one nundinum has elapsed after the announcement of the election results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V. There is no amnesty period associated with the enactment of this law as the previous extant legislation has already set the standard. Punitive measures are not specified in this law as they are already defined under the ''lex Lucilia iudiciaria''.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_ultimum_de_ordine_praecipuo_negotiorum_imperatori_Cn._Cornelio_Lentulo_tribuendo_(Nova_Roma)</id>
		<title>Senatus consultum ultimum de ordine praecipuo negotiorum imperatori Cn. Cornelio Lentulo tribuendo (Nova Roma)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_ultimum_de_ordine_praecipuo_negotiorum_imperatori_Cn._Cornelio_Lentulo_tribuendo_(Nova_Roma)"/>
				<updated>2026-06-03T20:00:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Adding &amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt; tags&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Failed rogationes (Nova Roma)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{LanguageBar|Senatus consultum ultimum de ordine praecipuo negotiorum imperatori Cn. Cornelio Lentulo tribuendo (Nova Roma)}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Praetores}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tabularium articles|pgchk=2|lexstat=|com=|yes=|no=|abs=|when=|scstat=4|scyes=2|scno=18|scabs=2|scwhen={{May 30}} {{2026}}|guideone=|guidetwo=}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''The final decree of the Senate concerning a priority ordering of duties to be granted to Imperator Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I. The senate has identified a set of critical tasks that should be completed this year. The senate requests the aid of Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, to complete these tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
II. In order to complete the identified critical tasks, the senate will require Cn. Cornelius Lentulus to temporarily cease various jobs and activities in the Republic. This final decree protects him, and anyone authorised to support him in these tasks. The senate establishes the following list of priority tasks that Cn. Cornelius Lentulus must complete, in order, as his only activity in Nova Roma, with the following exceptions and additional restrictions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may continue to organise, manage and attend activities and events in European-based provinces for which he holds a governor role. This includes municipal inquires and answering inquiries from provincial citizens related to official events and activities. This does not include actioning new minor or large-scale projects within any given province. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is encouraged to delegate as much tasking to provincial staff as possible. He may appoint new staff, as permitted under law.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:B. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus remains answerable to general inquiries from the consuls, praetors and curator aerarii, in his role as praefectus rei publicae administrandae and curator rei informaticae. These officers are encouraged to engage him as little as possible during the active period of this decree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:C. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is not prohibited from exercising any of his standard rights as a citizen of Nova Roma; he may continue to vote and debate in the senate, any comitia, and represent himself in any trial warranting his appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:D. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is not permitted to undertake any activities associated with his current magistracy or any member activities with a state-sponsored or aedile-registered special interest sodalitas or collegium. He is also restricted from undertaking any activity in his capacity as an apparitor (with the exception of censorial duties). This decree waives him from any penalties he may be subject to as a result of his inactivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:E. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus must report the completion of each task, or when commencing a second task simultaneously (as is permitted in cases below), to the consuls, providing necessary evidence or statements as to their status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:F. With the exception of the final task in the list below, all tasks must be completed within 6 months from the enactment of this decree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
III. Noting the above conditions, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is hereby tasked with the following priority activities:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. Utilizing existing platforms as required (like the Nova Roma Google account Google Drive), Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is to make the official live voting rolls (century and tribe) available to censorial office staff and any other offices required to have access. Publish the necessary instructions alongside with the rolls (citing extant law as required) on how these rolls are to be managed. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may not proceed to the next task until this is finished.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:B. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is to carry out all necessary training and induction for a second scriba into the censorial office to support citizen application processing and Album Civium updates. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may select who this new officer is. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may not proceed to the next task until the new member has been officially appointed.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:C. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is to employ a new staff member of his choice to the Officium rei Informaticae to process all emails to the central Nova Roma email accounts (i.e. novaromacontact Gmail address). He may add additional staff from other offices to supplement this new staff member also. He should publish a procedure document as required to inform account custodians how to respond to various inquiries. This procedure document should be stored on the respective account Google Drive the staff members will now have access to.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:D. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is to aid in the Initiation of any final examinations, any testing, or induction process required, for those camilli ready for elevation or graduation to full sacerdos. Providing the necessary approved rituals from the collegium. This task also includes reviewing and appointing new camilli that have placed an application and are responsive to Collegium communication. As required, host a session of the Collegium Pontificum to officially complete their appointments. Citizens identified for elevation who do not respond to verified received instructions from Cn. Cornelius Lentulus within two weeks are deemed “not ready” and may be ignored for the purpose of this decree. As this requires responses from others, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may proceed to the next task while awaiting responses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:E. Initiate the final induction process to induct those sacerdos who are eligible and able to enter their respective higher collegium. Providing the necessary approved procedures or guidance for the specific collegium. As required, host a session of the Collegium Pontificum to officially complete their appointments. Citizens identified for elevation who do not respond to verified received instructions from Cn. Cornelius Lentulus within two weeks are deemed “not ready” and may be ignored for the purpose of this decree. Current candidates requiring a longer program of study, or further research, should be equipped, briefed and instructed as required by the Collegium with a goal to graduate citizens before the allowed 6 months of this decree has elapsed. As this requires responses from others, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may proceed to the next task while awaiting responses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:F. With input from Collegium members as required, produce a document that guides all authorised magistrates on the procedures to correctly take the auspices. Appreciating the sacred nature of these procedures, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may determine the storage and distribution of this document, provided, at least, 3 citizens have access at any given time.  Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may not proceed to the next task until this is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:G. Employ and train a new staff member, of his choice, in the Officium rei Informaticae, whose sole job is to manage and curate a list on the Nova Roma Wiki, that specifies all digital forums, online accounts, servers and digital platforms owned or associated with Nova Roma (citing who the technical administrators or owners are also). This staff member will also have the responsibility for assigning permissions each year to those citizens needing specific permissions across these digital spaces. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may not proceed to the next task until the new member has been officially appointed.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:H. Within one month of commencing this task, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is to make a recommendation to the consuls for local governorship for the following provinces to relive him in these areas. Within this time, he is to identify and brief/train as necessary his selected replacements who will be considered by the senate. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may not proceed to the next task until the replacements have been provided to the consuls. The provinces are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::i. America Transmississippiana&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::ii. Germania (to be made an independent reported province)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::iii. Lacus Magni&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I. Working with the censors as required, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is to ensure the appointment of a new staff member to the Officium Onomasticum and who also attends to the Censorial Board of Latin Examiners. Cn. Lentulus is to publish a local procedures document as required to govern how he sees these roles carrying out their function. This procedural document is to be published to the Nova Roma Tabularium. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus may proceed to the next task while awaiting responses from the censors as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:J. Cn. Lentulus is to produce a toga draping information video(s) that will inform Nova Roma citizens how to correctly put on a toga. Cn. Lentulus is empowered to commission up to two citizens to support him in this task – those citizens being excused from their primary roles (if any) in Nova Roma to support this activity. Those citizens are protected under the power of this decree to support this task. This task also requires him to publish a document that details the blueprints and design for citizens to make their own or commission the production of their own toga virilis, tunica, angusticlavia, toga praetexta, stola etc. Any videos are to be published to Nova Roma social media and the official Roman clothing design document is to be published on the appropriate pages on the Nova Roma Wiki. Upon reaching this task, he has 2 months to complete it and may not proceed to the next task until all artefacts are published.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:K. Activate and commence work with his planned ICT workgroup that has been pending for a long duration to correct key Album Civium and website issues. Develop the required ICT report for the senate, if not already submitted, and commence a program and recommendations to migrate Nova Roma to a new website and album platform. Noting the magnitude of this task, the consuls can make a decision as to when sufficient progress has been achieved to lift the restrictions of this decree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IV. The senate must renew the elevated status of this decree every three months as required to afford the necessary protections for Cn. Cornelius Lentulus and supporting citizens. The consuls may grant at their discretion, only up to 3-months of extension, to the time limit to complete all tasks, to compensate for medical or family emergencies affecting him or his family. The Collegium Iurisprudentium, and the current magistri of the college, are hereby tasked to prioritise any request from Cn. Cornelius Lentulus that seeks any aid of formally publishing/formatting a document, or seeks to review any written procedure he writes. Upon the enactment of this decree, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus is obligated to commence tasking priorities as listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_May_2779</id>
		<title>Session May 2779</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Session_May_2779"/>
				<updated>2026-06-03T18:39:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Establishing page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presiding Magistrate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma) |D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]], [[Consul]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The session was chaired by [[Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius (Nova Roma)|D. Aurelius Ingeniarius]]. The 'Call to Convene' was announced on {{May 1}}. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consular Auspices==&lt;br /&gt;
The auspices were taken by D. Aurelius Ingeniarius, consul. They were taken in a small garden, just 1.8km from the outer walls of the original foundations of the Augusta Taurinorum. Under guidance from Cn. Corenlius Lentulus, pontifex, sacrifices and prayers were made to Iuppiter Optimus Maximus. The auspices were found to be favorable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consular Opening and Closing Ceremony==&lt;br /&gt;
An opening ceremony of rites and sacrifice was made by consul, D. Aurelius Ingeniarius. The closing ceremony was conducted {{May 30}}, on the shores of Lago di Garda, Italy, by the presiding magistrate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quorum==&lt;br /&gt;
The senate has 23 voting members registered. In accordance with article XI.E. of the Senatus consultum de ratione senatus MMDCCLXV, no senator is deemed absent as no senator has lodged their pending absence on this forum. As per article I, 2/3 of registered members constitutes a quorum; this is 16 members. With 23 of 23 members accounted for, quorum is achieved. The 23 voting members are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*D. Aurelius Ingeniarius, '''consul''', ''presiding magistrate, senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Caecilius Metellus Tocaiensis, '''consul''', ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*L. Calpurnius Bestia, '''praetor'''&lt;br /&gt;
*D. Claudius Aquilinus, '''praetor'''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Aurelius Cotta Iovius, '''censor''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Petronius Stephanus Turpilianus, '''censor''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*Fl. Vedius Germanicus, princeps senatus, ''senator censorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Sex. Lucilius Tutor, ''senator censorius&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Arrius Nauta, '''decemvir stlitibus iudicandis''', ''senator censorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*T. Domitius Draco, ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Cornelius Cethegus Barosus, ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*P. Aurelius Barbatus, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator consularis''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Flavius Constantinus Aeneas Stilicho, ''senator consularis''          &lt;br /&gt;
*M. Hortensia Maior Fabiana Faustina, ''senatrix praetoria''&lt;br /&gt;
*P. Porcius Licinus, curator aerarii, ''senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ti. Iulius Nerva, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator praetorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Vitellius Celsus, ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Iulius Paterculus, '''quattuorvir rerum curandarum''', ''senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, '''triumvir monetalis''', ''princeps iuventutis, senator aedilicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*M. Octavius Corvus, '''triumvir monetalis''', ''senator tribunicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ap. Curius Rullus, ''senator tribunicius''&lt;br /&gt;
*A. Ocratius Maximus Gittus, '''tribunus militum comitiatus''', ''senator quaestorius''&lt;br /&gt;
*Sibylla Fulvia Ambrosia, ''senatrix privata''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following 5 tribuni plebis who are not senators themselves have the right to attend this meeting of&lt;br /&gt;
the Senate and are invited to participate therein:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ti. Horatius Barbatus, '''tribunus plebis''' &lt;br /&gt;
*M. Claudius Marcellus, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Q. Flavius Hugo Capito, '''tribunus plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
*C. Valeria Terra, '''tribuna plebis'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
:{|border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1000  Rome Time (CET)  {{May 1}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(1 May 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to convene. The call to convene shall last a nundium to allow new senators to subscribe to the Curia Cornelia.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2030 Rome Time (CET)  {{May 12}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(12 May 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to order. Opening address. Agenda items are put forward. Debate period commences.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2100 Rome Time (CET) {{May 27}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(27 May 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to vote. Debate is allowed to continue during voting.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2100 Rome Time (CET) {{May 30}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(30 May 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Voting period closes. No further voting or discussion is permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2100 Rome Time (CET) {{May 31}} 2779 AVC&lt;br /&gt;
|(31 May 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|Call to close. Call to close made before this time.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presiding Magistrate's Closing Comments==&lt;br /&gt;
To the esteemed senators and citizens of Nova Roma!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This draws to a close the second session of the senate this year. This was another interesting session and I am happy we made some good progress despite only a few of the 23 senators actually offering any suggestions or improvements. We should all extend our thanks to the senators of D. Claudius, P. Aurelius, P. Porcius, T. Domitius, Fl. Germanicus and A. Iulius, who made meaningful and constructive comments before the vote in the senate to try and shape the proposals on the agenda. I also welcome those comments made by senators as part of their vote, although we were unable to enact on those in this session. We are often dealing with multi-faceted or complex issues and a diversity of different ideas really help us to come up with the best solution. My consular team and I are not perfect, and also such a small representation of the whole Republic, so, contributions like those from the senators above, help create better rounded proposals. I continue to encourage our whole senate body to ensure you are heard, no matter how small a suggestion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize this session, the senate has decided, through their votes, on the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. Despite attempts to rein in the approach, the senate has doubled-down on its commitment to spend at least two thirds of our entire treasury over three years on togas, tunics, tents and reenactment display items. Although there is certainly some merit in these purchases, the senate has insisted on no central oversight and no stipulation to track the purchases. The senate has refused to place any spending limits on this program, demanding an open budget. To provide some accountability, the senate has separately appointed a new curator aerarii (Chief Information Officer) this session, and through him, we may be able to start tracking the purchases at the very least. I'll continue to work with the previously appointed spending committee to try and gain more transparency and budgetary restraint. Noting our aging and obsolete online infrastructure, more work needs to be done to ensure we are spending appropriately, that benefits the majority of citizens. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:B. I was pleased to see the senate accepted responsibility and accountability for the lack of financial reporting this session. The senate had inadequately supported our previous curator aerarii in communicating his tasking to him. We have also now, discharged, with honors, our previous curator aerarii, P. Porcius Licinus, and welcomed in a new curator aerarii, P. Aurelius Barbatus. We owe a great thanks to P. Porcius, and through our actions in this senate, we have now set up P. Aurelius for success. Through his enthusiasm, we may even get the greater extent of reporting we require this year too. I, and the senate, look forward to the contributions of P. Aurelius.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:C. Through some effort, we were also able to define, for the first time, a process of acknowledgment for your citizen tax payments. The senate has heard your numerous complaints, your numerous concerns, and has sought to define a process and timeline of receipt and acknowledgment. The treasury team, under the good guidance of our new curator aerarii, will seek to start a better chain of communication, to not only acknowledge your gracious tax contributions to Nova Roma, but also ensure your public Album Civium records reflect your status accordingly. I am now off to brief the treasury and censorial team to ensure we can meet our obligations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:D. Many citizens will be pleased to hear that we have made steps to open a European-based bank account in the name of Nova Roma. There is still a bit of investigation and work to do yet, but we are attempting to provide our international community with more options. We’ll also be making a U.S. based bank account open in the next few months also. Stay tuned. In the meantime, the PayPal remains the usual option to pay your taxes. See the ongoing tax information here: http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Nova_Roma_Taxes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is still much needing to be addressed. For example, we still face inefficiencies in many processes across our Republic. I hope we can explore solutions to these issues in our future sessions. We also need to undertake provincial administrative reporting and accountability this year also. Rest assured, we are working hard to resolve these things as soon as we can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agenda==&lt;br /&gt;
:{|border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM I&lt;br /&gt;
|Opening Address &lt;br /&gt;
|''Item not for vote. Discussion Only.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM II&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the abolition of the Office of Civil Assistance of Nova Roma &lt;br /&gt;
|''Item not for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM III&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the repeal of a previous SC on public assemblies&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item not for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM IV&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning a temporary exemption from the reporting of public accounts this year&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item not for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM V&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the appointment of a curator of the treasury&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item not for vote.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM VI&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the establishment of an office for administering the elections&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item not for vote. Withdrawn by presiding magistrate.''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM VII&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the management of tax status recording &lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for Vote''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM VIII&lt;br /&gt;
|Ultimate Decree concerning the prioritization of Nova Roma tasking &lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for Vote''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM IX&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the establishment of alternate tax paying methods&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for Vote''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ITEM X&lt;br /&gt;
|Decree concerning the increased regulation to be imposed on the acquisition of clothing and public equipment of Nova Roma&lt;br /&gt;
|''Item for Vote''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposal Results==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM II - Senatus consultum de officio auxilii civilis Novae Romae abolendo''' - ''Decree concerning the abolition of the Office of Civil Assistance of Nova Roma''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 22 (DAI, MCMT, LCB, DCA, MACI, CPST, FlVG, SxLT, QAN, TDD, CCCB, PAB, CFCAS, MHMFF, PPL, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, MOC, AOMG, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 1 (ApCR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM III - Senatus consultum de conventibus publicis abrogando''' - ''Decree concerning the repeal of a previous SC on public assemblies''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 22 (DAI, MCMT, LCB, DCA, MACI, CPST, FlVG, SxLT, QAN, TDD, CCCB, PAB, CFCAS, MHMFF, PPL, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, MOC, AOMG, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::AIP: Such a coordinated calendar as was proposed would be a useful tool. I hope that we can find a new volunteer and revisit this idea in the near future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 1 (ApCR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM IV - Senatus consultum de exemptione temporaria a relatione rationum publicarum hoc anno''' - ''Decree concerning a temporary exemption from the reporting of public accounts this year''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 16 (DAI, MCMT, LCB, MACI, SxLT, QAN, CCCB, CFCAS, MHMFF, PPL, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, MOC, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 5 (DCA, CPST, FlVG, TDD, AOMG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::TDD: Absolutely not.  We require an accurate reporting of the finances of Nova Roma.  For too long has it been ignored and it must stop.  We, as members of the Board of Directors of Nova Roma, Inc have a LEGAL FIDICUARY DUTY to the corporation, to its members, to its donors, and the State of Maine.  Interesting fact:  Any member of the Board can demand the financial documentation of Nova Roma that must legally be granted within five business days (unless the demanding party allow further leeway) and that Nova Roma will be financially responsible for the legal fees incurred if it is taken to the Maine Superior Court. While I can see granting an extension, we cannot and should not continue to shirk our actual responsibilities.  We can't keep kicking the can to the following year.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::FlVG: Financial responsibility is a fundamental necessity, and we owe it to the Cives to see that it is being enforced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::CPST: I agree with some of my colleagues that financial responsibility is a fundamental necessity, and we owe it to the Cives to see that it is being enforced. We require an accurate reporting of the finances of Nova Roma.  For too long it seems to have been ignored, and this practice must cease. I have been producing accounts for my law firm for some 38 years now, rather than paying an accountant to do this, and so I have some idea of what is involved, and the time required.  It seems to me that the only reason we do not have public accounts is the required time, which would not be exorbitant (given the relatively limited number of transactions involving income and outgoings), has not been spent on this. Probably, if someone applied themselves fully to this task, it would take not more than 3 to 5 full days to complete at most, and that is being generous. It takes me less than one day to do the paperwork associated with my law firm’s own accounts, going through the receipts, adding up all the income and expenditure, and making the necessary calculations,  It therefore seems a choice not to produce these accounts, rather than a product of inescapable or unforeseen circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::AOMG: I agree with some of my colleagues that financial responsibility is a fundamental necessity, and we owe it to the Cives to see that it is being enforced.  Accurate reporting of the finances of Nova Roma is an obligation and not just a wish list.   Financial transparency in office is an absolute requirement.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 1 (PAB)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::PAB: As the proposed curator aerarii and the individual who would be responsible for producing the required report should this measure pass, I believe it is appropriate that I abstain from voting on this item. Should this measure and the one appointing me the new curator aerarii pass, I will undertake my duties diligently and will work toward producing the preliminary report required by Kal. Sext. in order to improve transparency regarding the current state of Nova Roma's finances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 1 (ApCR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM V - Senatus consultum de curatore aerarii creando''' - ''Decree concerning the appointment of a curator of the treasury''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 21 (DAI, MCMT, LCB, DCA, MACI, CPST, FlVG, SxLT, QAN, TDD, CCCB, CFCAS, MHMFF, PPL, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, MOC, AOMG, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 1 (PAB)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::PAB: As this proposal directly concerns my own appointment to office, I believe it is proper that I abstain from voting on the matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 1 (ApCR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM VII - Senatus consultum de tabulis tributorum''' - ''Decree concerning the management of tax status recording''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 11 (DAI, MCMT, DCA, FlVG, SxLT, TDD, PAB, CFCAS, PPL, AVC, CnCL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 8 (LCB, MACI, QAN, CCCB, MHMFF, TiIN, MOC, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 3 (CPST, AIP, AOMG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::CPST: I agree with A. Iulius Paterculus that citizens should be informed that Nova Roma has received their taxes. If M. Cotta Iovius believes that compliance is not feasible with this proposal as it stands, then I will defer to his judgement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::AIP: Citizens should be informed that Nova Roma has received their taxes. If M. Cotta Iovius believes that it compliance is not feasible with this proposal as it stands, then I will take his more experienced judgement, but I hope we revisit this with whatever minor adjustments it would take to satisfy everyone that it can be done.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::AOMG: Citizens should be informed that Nova Roma has received their taxes. If M. Cotta Iovius believes that compliance is not feasible with this proposal as it stands, then I will defer to his judgement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 1 (ApCR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM VIII - Senatus consultum ultimum de ordine praecipuo negotiorum imperatori Cn. Cornelio Lentulo tribuendo''' - ''Ultimate Decree concerning the prioritization of Nova Roma tasking''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 2 (DAI, TDD)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments: ''Not for public release.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 18 (MCMT, LCB, DCA, MACI, FlVG, SxLT, QAN, CCCB, PAB, CFCAS, MHMFF, PPL, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, MOC, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments: ''Not for public release.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 2 (CPST, AOMG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt = 1 (ApCR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: NON ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM REJECTED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM IX - Senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum''' - ''Decree concerning the establishment of alternate tax paying methods''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 20 (DAI, MCMT, LCB, DCA, MACI, FlVG, SxLT, QAN, TDD, CCCB, PAB, CFCAS, MHMFF, PPL, TiIN, AVC, AIP, CnCL, MOC, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt: 3 (CPST, AOMG, ApCR)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM PASSED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''ITEM X - Senatus consultum de moderatione aucta in vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae comparandis imponenda''' - ''Decree concerning the increased regulation to be imposed on the acquisition of clothing and public equipment of Nova Roma''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uti rogas / censeo / consentio = 8 (DAI, DCA, CPST, FlVG, TDD, PPL, AIP, AOMG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DCA: I don't understand the numerous votes against this item so far. Currently, there is no spending limit and no requirement to keep a paper trail for items purchased with Nova Roman funds per the senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae (although it did specify &amp;quot;the committee shall also study and recommend the creation of a secretariate to determine custodianship, storage, and logistical management of these assets&amp;quot; which I have not seen an update on.) I am in favor of purchasing items that we demonstrably need as the budget allows, but we must live within our means since we can't just add digits to Nova Roma's Bank of America and PayPal accounts. The moderate financial information that I have seen shows that Nova Roma needs more spending control and discussions on fiscal priorities, not less...especially as we dig deeply into the financial reserves this year. How many more large annual budget deficits can we absorb? Targeted purchases that we can afford I do support, and if revenues increase/expenses decrease then items purchased could commensurately be increased. Nevertheless, a blank check for unlimited spending that we don't even see happening in real time or vote on I cannot support, neither as a taxpayer nor as a senator since the board of directors for Nova Roma Inc. each carry a personal fiduciary responsibility. Also, establishing a record for all purchases in addition to custodianship, storage, and logistical management is common sense as well as overdue. Therefore, I feel obligated to go on record in the minutes of the senate as opposing unlimited spending on this topic and insisting on having a reasonable spending limit which this proposed item in front of the senate would do. That is, if one would think that a spending cap of 1,200 EUR on physical items is still in the realm of being fiscally reasonable after spending perhaps 4,000 EUR on the conventus plus a substantial amount for the website (I didn't see that figure for this year yet) when comparing those to revenues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::CPST: I agree with A. Iulius Paterculus that a finite budget devoted to reenactment makes a lot of sense, and we should have a fuller discussion before either going forward with the proposed purchases or discarding the plan. Since section II includes a provision for a budget increase to be requested through the senate, like A. Iulius Paterculus, I am voting in favour so we are required to have that conversation. My preference would be not to define the amount allocated as a fixed amount of  Euros, but rather as a percentage of the previous year’s income, which requires that we are properly provided with annual accounts so that we can judge the state of Nova Roma’s finances.  This means that the budget for these items can increase as our income increase, incentivising us to grow our revenues, or automatically decrease as income falls. I am involve in local politics, and have seen how 14 years of carefully husbanding our budget, and actually increasing our council reserves, have been squandered by the new minority administration of a different incoming party, who acted like “kids in a candy store” when they go back into office, handing out money left, right, and centre.  As a consequence,  within a matter of 16 months they have effectively made my local authority bankrupt, with all the negative knock on effects in terms of cuts to services this is now having.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::FlVG: I am glad that the concerns I raised when this item was originally passed are finally being recognized and acted upon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::TDD: No blank checks.  I voted against the project for that very reason last year. Re-enactment is NOT the primary responsibility of Nova Roma and our funding, such as it may or may not be as we have received no financial reports in years, is better spent on bettering the body public of Nova Roma.  Improving our infrastructure, investing in education (such as Latin, history, culture, religion). et cetera.  Re-enactment is a tool, not our end-all.  I would rather see us providing certifications than replicated chairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::AIP: I think that the general sentiment that there should be a finite budget devoted to reenactment makes a lot of sense, but when this proposal was drafted and during most of the debate period we did not have access to the information on the exact nature of planned expenditures which C. Flavius Constantinus gave us a day ago. We should have a full discussion before either going forward with the proposed purchases or discarding the plan. Since section II includes a provision for a budget increase to be requested through the senate, I am voting in favor so we are forced to have that conversation, though I hope that we will talk about it more in depth whether this specific provision succeeds or fails.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::AOMG: I agree with A. Iulius Paterculus that a finite budget devoted to reenactment makes a lot of sense, and we should have a fuller discussion before either going forward with the proposed purchases or discarding the plan. Since section II includes a provision for a budget increase to be requested through the senate, like A. Iulius Paterculus, I am voting in favour so we are required to have that conversation. My preference would be not to define the amount allocated as a fixed amount of  Euros, but rather as a percentage of the previous year’s income, which requires that we are properly provided with annual accounts so that we can judge the state of Nova Roma’s finances.  This means that the budget for these items can increase as our income increase, incentivising us to grow our revenues, or automatically decrease as income falls. I am involve in local politics, and have seen how 14 years of carefully husbanding our budget, and actually increasing our council reserves, have been squandered by the new minority administration of a different incoming party, who acted like “kids in a candy store” when they go back into office, handing out money left, right, and centre.  As a consequence,  within a matter of 16 months they have effectively made my local authority bankrupt, with all the negative knock on effects in terms of cuts to services this is now having.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antiquo / Dissentio = 14 (MCMT, LCB, MACI, SxLT, QAN, CCCB, PAB, CFCAS, MHMFF, TiIN, AVC, CnCL, MOC, SiFA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::PAB: In principle, I support the establishment of reasonable financial oversight and accountability regarding the acquisition of public equipment. However, during my consulship, the senate enacted the senatus consultum de vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae. Following its passage, my former co-consul C. Flavius Constantinus, in cooperation with Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, began work on a substantial project intended to elevate Nova Roma's physical presence in Europe. Having worked alongside my former co-consul on this effort, I cannot support restrictions that would likely halt or substantially delay a project already in development. Accordingly, and with respect to the hard work my colleagues are investing in this undertaking, while I support prudent fiscal oversight in principle, I must vote against this proposal in its current form and at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstineo = 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nihil censuerunt: 1 (ApCR)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CENSUERE: NON ITA CENSUERUNT (ITEM REJECTED)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Session Results==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Senators who did not vote in this session: ApCR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;95%&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;background:#993333; text-align:center; color:#ffffff;&amp;quot;  | Item nb.&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;background:#993333; text-align:center; color:#ffffff;&amp;quot;  | Item title&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | II&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de officio auxilii civilis Novae Romae abolendo (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de officio auxilii civilis Novae Romae abolendo]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | III&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de conventibus publicis abrogando (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de conventibus publicis abrogando]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | IV&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de exemptione temporaria a relatione rationum publicarum hoc anno (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de exemptione temporaria a relatione rationum publicarum hoc anno]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | V&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de curatore aerarii creando (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de curatore aerarii creando]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | VII&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de tabulis tributorum (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de tabulis tributorum]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | VIII&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum ultimum de ordine praecipuo negotiorum imperatori Cn. Cornelio Lentulo tribuendo (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum ultimum de ordine praecipuo negotiorum imperatori Cn. Cornelio Lentulo tribuendo]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | IX&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de ordine novo tributorum exigendorum]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | X&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; font-size:8pt;&amp;quot; | [[Senatus consultum de moderatione aucta in vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae comparandis imponenda (Nova Roma)|Senatus consultum de moderatione aucta in vestimentis et instrumentis publicis Novae Romae comparandis imponenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Senate sessions (Nova Roma)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>