User talk:Titus Iulius Sabinus - Revision history

Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Added HP tag

Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius — Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:08:22 GMT

Added HP tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 28 June 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{HistoricalDocument}}
	{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}		{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}
	{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}		{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}

Titus Iulius Sabinus: answers to Lentulus

Titus Iulius Sabinus — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:51:12 GMT

answers to Lentulus

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 12 December 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	::Now I understand you. I am one of the people who worries about ''mos majorum'' the most, but as I see our current circumstances, I would be glad to vote for a former vigintisexvir to become consul or praetor right now if he is ready to work. But my opinion is not relevant here, at all. The '''voters''' will decide if the candidate is worthy to be elected based on his qualifications, but they can decide only if there are multiply choices to elect from. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)		::Now I understand you. I am one of the people who worries about ''mos majorum'' the most, but as I see our current circumstances, I would be glad to vote for a former vigintisexvir to become consul or praetor right now if he is ready to work. But my opinion is not relevant here, at all. The '''voters''' will decide if the candidate is worthy to be elected based on his qualifications, but they can decide only if there are multiply choices to elect from. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	::: Ah...current circumstances. I don't see the things this way. I am sure will have enough candidates for offices and many will be challenged. I can bet, metaphoric speaking. You see, pages have specific function. For me the function of this page was to provide the elections frames. Technically speaking.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 18:51, 12 December 2011 (CET)

	:The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)		:The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)

	::This is something that I was talking about in the censorial office. Communication reform is needed. Citizens should be contacted '''directly''' in their mailboxes, not via mailinglists. Most of the people hate mailinglists. I know a lot of active NR people who '''are''' interested in NR news, but will refuse to subscribe to mailinglists because they are not interested in chit-chat or debates. Most of the citizens would like to get an events-news notifcation. The Announcements List was never a good solution because it contained huge amounts of edicts and politics. But this is now going to become another discussion. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)		::This is something that I was talking about in the censorial office. Communication reform is needed. Citizens should be contacted '''directly''' in their mailboxes, not via mailinglists. Most of the people hate mailinglists. I know a lot of active NR people who '''are''' interested in NR news, but will refuse to subscribe to mailinglists because they are not interested in chit-chat or debates. Most of the citizens would like to get an events-news notifcation. The Announcements List was never a good solution because it contained huge amounts of edicts and politics. But this is now going to become another discussion. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	:::I agree with that. I wish to have such automatic tool during the census. Well, from theory to practice is difference however.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 18:51, 12 December 2011 (CET)

	==Deletion==		==Deletion==

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus: /* Call for candidates on election page */

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:29:16 GMT

Call for candidates on election page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 12 December 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:I was afraid by the content you wrote and still afraid. Based of it, one who hold a magistracy will believe is enough and will jump from vigintisexvir to censor or from quaestor to consul to give you a few examples. I know our laws permit that, because were wrote in a period of high citizens number and when elections were really a challenge, but currently will result in candidacies without a base in mos maiorum. .[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)		:I was afraid by the content you wrote and still afraid. Based of it, one who hold a magistracy will believe is enough and will jump from vigintisexvir to censor or from quaestor to consul to give you a few examples. I know our laws permit that, because were wrote in a period of high citizens number and when elections were really a challenge, but currently will result in candidacies without a base in mos maiorum. .[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)

−	::Now I understand you. I am one of the people who worries about ''mos majorum'' the most, but as I see our current circumstances, I would be glad to vote for a former vigintisexvir ~~o be~~ consul or praetor right now if he is ready to work. But my opinion is not relevant here, at all. The '''voters''' will decide if the candidate is worthy to be elected, but they can decide only if there are multiply choices to elect from. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)	+	::Now I understand you. I am one of the people who worries about ''mos majorum'' the most, but as I see our current circumstances, I would be glad to vote for a former vigintisexvir to become consul or praetor right now if he is ready to work. But my opinion is not relevant here, at all. The '''voters''' will decide if the candidate is worthy to be elected based on his qualifications, but they can decide only if there are multiply choices to elect from. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)

	:The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)		:The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)

−	::This is something that I was talking about in the censorial office. Communication reform is needed. Citizens should be contacted '''directly''' in their mailboxes, not via mailinglists. Most of the people hate mailinglists. I know a lot of active NR people who '''are''' interested i NR news, but will refuse to subscribe to mailinglists because they are not interested in chit-chat or debates. Most of the citizens would like to get an events-news notifcation. The Announcements List was never a good solution because it contained huge amounts of edicts and politics. But this is now going to become another discussion. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)	+	::This is something that I was talking about in the censorial office. Communication reform is needed. Citizens should be contacted '''directly''' in their mailboxes, not via mailinglists. Most of the people hate mailinglists. I know a lot of active NR people who '''are''' interested in NR news, but will refuse to subscribe to mailinglists because they are not interested in chit-chat or debates. Most of the citizens would like to get an events-news notifcation. The Announcements List was never a good solution because it contained huge amounts of edicts and politics. But this is now going to become another discussion. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)
−		+

	==Deletion==		==Deletion==

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus: answering

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:26:34 GMT

answering

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 12 December 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)		I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)

−	I was afraid by the content you wrote and still afraid. Based of it, one who hold a magistracy will believe is enough and will jump from vigintisexvir to censor or from quaestor to consul to give you a few examples. I know our laws permit that, because were wrote in a period of high citizens number and when elections were really a challenge, but currently will result in candidacies without a base in mos maiorum. The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)	+	:I was afraid by the content you wrote and still afraid. Based of it, one who hold a magistracy will believe is enough and will jump from vigintisexvir to censor or from quaestor to consul to give you a few examples. I know our laws permit that, because were wrote in a period of high citizens number and when elections were really a challenge, but currently will result in candidacies without a base in mos maiorum. .[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	::Now I understand you. I am one of the people who worries about ''mos majorum'' the most, but as I see our current circumstances, I would be glad to vote for a former vigintisexvir o be consul or praetor right now if he is ready to work. But my opinion is not relevant here, at all. The '''voters''' will decide if the candidate is worthy to be elected, but they can decide only if there are multiply choices to elect from. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	:The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	::This is something that I was talking about in the censorial office. Communication reform is needed. Citizens should be contacted '''directly''' in their mailboxes, not via mailinglists. Most of the people hate mailinglists. I know a lot of active NR people who '''are''' interested i NR news, but will refuse to subscribe to mailinglists because they are not interested in chit-chat or debates. Most of the citizens would like to get an events-news notifcation. The Announcements List was never a good solution because it contained huge amounts of edicts and politics. But this is now going to become another discussion. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)

Titus Iulius Sabinus: answer to Lentulus

Titus Iulius Sabinus — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:17:44 GMT

answer to Lentulus

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 12 December 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)		I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	I was afraid by the content you wrote and still afraid. Based of it, one who hold a magistracy will believe is enough and will jump from vigintisexvir to censor or from quaestor to consul to give you a few examples. I know our laws permit that, because were wrote in a period of high citizens number and when elections were really a challenge, but currently will result in candidacies without a base in mos maiorum. The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus at 12:27, 12 December 2011

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:27:18 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 12 December 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<p style="font-size:small; font-weight:bold; text-align:center">In order to register to the census, click [http://www.novaroma.org/bin/contact here], select "Censores" in the contact section, complete "Your email address" with your email address, give to the message the title "Census" in the "Subject" section and write your Nova Roman name in the text field of the "Message". At the end, press "Submit" </p>		<p style="font-size:small; font-weight:bold; text-align:center">In order to register to the census, click [http://www.novaroma.org/bin/contact here], select "Censores" in the contact section, complete "Your email address" with your email address, give to the message the title "Census" in the "Subject" section and write your Nova Roman name in the text field of the "Message". At the end, press "Submit" </p>
	</div>		</div>
		+
		+	== Call for candidates on election page ==
		+
		+	I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)


Line 84:		Line 88:

	I would like to call your attention that there are now a lot of [[:Category:Pages to be deleted\|pages to be deleted]]. Cura, ut valeas! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 19:26, 28 October 2008 (CET)		I would like to call your attention that there are now a lot of [[:Category:Pages to be deleted\|pages to be deleted]]. Cura, ut valeas! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 19:26, 28 October 2008 (CET)
−
−	~~== Call for candidates on election page ==~~
−
−	I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus: /* Call for candidates on election page */ new section

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:26:01 GMT

Call for candidates on election page: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 12 December 2011
Line 84:		Line 84:

	I would like to call your attention that there are now a lot of [[:Category:Pages to be deleted\|pages to be deleted]]. Cura, ut valeas! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 19:26, 28 October 2008 (CET)		I would like to call your attention that there are now a lot of [[:Category:Pages to be deleted\|pages to be deleted]]. Cura, ut valeas! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 19:26, 28 October 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	== Call for candidates on election page ==
		+
		+	I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)

Titus Iulius Sabinus: census registration - work in progress

Titus Iulius Sabinus — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:35:21 GMT

census registration - work in progress

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:35, 4 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}		{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}
	{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}		{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}
		+
		+	==Census registration==
		+
		+	<div style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border:ridge #B22222; padding:0.5em">
		+	<p style="font-size:small; font-weight:bold; text-align:center">In order to register to the census, click [http://www.novaroma.org/bin/contact here], select "Censores" in the contact section, complete "Your email address" with your email address, give to the message the title "Census" in the "Subject" section and write your Nova Roman name in the text field of the "Message". At the end, press "Submit" </p>
		+	</div>
		+

	==Deletion==		==Deletion==

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus at 18:27, 28 October 2008

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:27:20 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:27, 28 October 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}		{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}

		+	==Deletion==
		+
		+	Salve, Sabine, amice carissime!
		+
		+	I would like to call your attention that there are now a lot of [[:Category:Pages to be deleted\|pages to be deleted]]. Cura, ut valeas! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 19:27, 28 October 2008 (CET)

	== Declaratia Noii Rome ==		== Declaratia Noii Rome ==

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus: Pages waiting for deletion

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:26:18 GMT

Pages waiting for deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 28 October 2008
Line 66:		Line 66:
	Shall we create a space for Romanian? (Language code RO) [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 01:27, 3 February 2008 (CET)		Shall we create a space for Romanian? (Language code RO) [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 01:27, 3 February 2008 (CET)
	: Yes, it's time to start.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 01:48, 3 February 2008 (CET)		: Yes, it's time to start.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 01:48, 3 February 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	== Pages waiting for deletion ==
		+
		+	Salve, Sabine, amice carissime!
		+
		+	I would like to call your attention that there are now a lot of [[:Category:Pages to be deleted\|pages to be deleted]]. Cura, ut valeas! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 19:26, 28 October 2008 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 12 December 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	::Now I understand you. I am one of the people who worries about ''mos majorum'' the most, but as I see our current circumstances, I would be glad to vote for a former vigintisexvir to become consul or praetor right now if he is ready to work. But my opinion is not relevant here, at all. The '''voters''' will decide if the candidate is worthy to be elected based on his qualifications, but they can decide only if there are multiply choices to elect from. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)		::Now I understand you. I am one of the people who worries about ''mos majorum'' the most, but as I see our current circumstances, I would be glad to vote for a former vigintisexvir to become consul or praetor right now if he is ready to work. But my opinion is not relevant here, at all. The '''voters''' will decide if the candidate is worthy to be elected based on his qualifications, but they can decide only if there are multiply choices to elect from. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	::: Ah...current circumstances. I don't see the things this way. I am sure will have enough candidates for offices and many will be challenged. I can bet, metaphoric speaking. You see, pages have specific function. For me the function of this page was to provide the elections frames. Technically speaking.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 18:51, 12 December 2011 (CET)

	:The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)		:The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)

	::This is something that I was talking about in the censorial office. Communication reform is needed. Citizens should be contacted '''directly''' in their mailboxes, not via mailinglists. Most of the people hate mailinglists. I know a lot of active NR people who '''are''' interested in NR news, but will refuse to subscribe to mailinglists because they are not interested in chit-chat or debates. Most of the citizens would like to get an events-news notifcation. The Announcements List was never a good solution because it contained huge amounts of edicts and politics. But this is now going to become another discussion. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)		::This is something that I was talking about in the censorial office. Communication reform is needed. Citizens should be contacted '''directly''' in their mailboxes, not via mailinglists. Most of the people hate mailinglists. I know a lot of active NR people who '''are''' interested in NR news, but will refuse to subscribe to mailinglists because they are not interested in chit-chat or debates. Most of the citizens would like to get an events-news notifcation. The Announcements List was never a good solution because it contained huge amounts of edicts and politics. But this is now going to become another discussion. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	:::I agree with that. I wish to have such automatic tool during the census. Well, from theory to practice is difference however.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 18:51, 12 December 2011 (CET)

	==Deletion==		==Deletion==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 12 December 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)		I added again, but now in a sorter version, of what was there previously, because I beleieve that we can not say something enough times: the more repetition the better. And especially newer people must be informed in a quick, visible, and transparent way what office should they run for. The "candidacy banner" will be '''removed''' right when the time of accepting candidacies (16 Dec.)expires, so the "candidacy banner" is just a temporary element, not a permanent part of the page. Election page will contain only election data from 16th December. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)

−	I was afraid by the content you wrote and still afraid. Based of it, one who hold a magistracy will believe is enough and will jump from vigintisexvir to censor or from quaestor to consul to give you a few examples. I know our laws permit that, because were wrote in a period of high citizens number and when elections were really a challenge, but currently will result in candidacies without a base in mos maiorum. The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)	+	:I was afraid by the content you wrote and still afraid. Based of it, one who hold a magistracy will believe is enough and will jump from vigintisexvir to censor or from quaestor to consul to give you a few examples. I know our laws permit that, because were wrote in a period of high citizens number and when elections were really a challenge, but currently will result in candidacies without a base in mos maiorum. .[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	::Now I understand you. I am one of the people who worries about ''mos majorum'' the most, but as I see our current circumstances, I would be glad to vote for a former vigintisexvir o be consul or praetor right now if he is ready to work. But my opinion is not relevant here, at all. The '''voters''' will decide if the candidate is worthy to be elected, but they can decide only if there are multiply choices to elect from. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	:The mailing list and other lists are the best places to say enough times with the amendment I still receive answers for census which bring me in conclusion we have citizens who read their NR emails once at three months.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus\|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 15:17, 12 December 2011 (CET)
		+
		+	::This is something that I was talking about in the censorial office. Communication reform is needed. Citizens should be contacted '''directly''' in their mailboxes, not via mailinglists. Most of the people hate mailinglists. I know a lot of active NR people who '''are''' interested i NR news, but will refuse to subscribe to mailinglists because they are not interested in chit-chat or debates. Most of the citizens would like to get an events-news notifcation. The Announcements List was never a good solution because it contained huge amounts of edicts and politics. But this is now going to become another discussion. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:26, 12 December 2011 (CET)