Talk:Roman calendar - Revision history

Marca Hortensia Maior at 03:36, 9 February 2008

2008-02-09T03:36:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 9 February 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:Be bold and update. Cite your sources as usual. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 03:28, 9 February 2008 (CET)		:Be bold and update. Cite your sources as usual. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 03:28, 9 February 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	thanks, I've been thinking about it and I'm not so sure, Haeperen's book isn't that good....but the note is here if I find another good source that agrees. So handy these discussion pages.

M. Lucretius Agricola: /* Update due? */ answer 2 Qs

2008-02-09T02:28:55Z

Update due?: answer 2 Qs

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 9 February 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I seem to recall the pontifices making a ruling about the significance of the various dies, including FP, some time ago. Am I right? If so, should this page be updated to reflect that ruling? - [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 02:28, 23 December 2006 (CET)		I seem to recall the pontifices making a ruling about the significance of the various dies, including FP, some time ago. Am I right? If so, should this page be updated to reflect that ruling? - [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 02:28, 23 December 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	:No, what our pontifices say should be reflected on [[Calendar (Nova Roma)]]. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 03:28, 9 February 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	==Dies Nefasti==

	I was leafing through van Haeperen's 'Le collège pontifical' & she makes the point quoting Macrobius that the Dies Nefasti restrictions were primarily so magistrates could carry out their religious duties without being impeded by other work/business.[[User:Marca Hortensia Maior\|Marca Hortensia Maior]]		I was leafing through van Haeperen's 'Le collège pontifical' & she makes the point quoting Macrobius that the Dies Nefasti restrictions were primarily so magistrates could carry out their religious duties without being impeded by other work/business.[[User:Marca Hortensia Maior\|Marca Hortensia Maior]]
		+
		+	:Be bold and update. Cite your sources as usual. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 03:28, 9 February 2008 (CET)

Marca Hortensia Maior: /* Update due? */

2008-02-09T02:21:13Z

Update due?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 9 February 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I seem to recall the pontifices making a ruling about the significance of the various dies, including FP, some time ago. Am I right? If so, should this page be updated to reflect that ruling? - [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 02:28, 23 December 2006 (CET)		I seem to recall the pontifices making a ruling about the significance of the various dies, including FP, some time ago. Am I right? If so, should this page be updated to reflect that ruling? - [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 02:28, 23 December 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	I was leafing through van Haeperen's 'Le collège pontifical' & she makes the point quoting Macrobius that the Dies Nefasti restrictions were primarily so magistrates could carry out their religious duties without being impeded by other work/business.[[User:Marca Hortensia Maior\|Marca Hortensia Maior]]

Aulus Apollonius Cordus: Update due?

2006-12-23T01:28:47Z

Update due?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 23 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I think that perhaps this page should be changed to something like "calendrical designations" or something to that effect, since that is really what this page covers. Something on the Roman calendar on the whole would be quite an exhaustive article, which isn't what, I think, this article is meant to provide. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q. Caecilius Metellus]] 23:58, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		I think that perhaps this page should be changed to something like "calendrical designations" or something to that effect, since that is really what this page covers. Something on the Roman calendar on the whole would be quite an exhaustive article, which isn't what, I think, this article is meant to provide. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q. Caecilius Metellus]] 23:58, 26 April 2006 (CDT)
	:Well, the subtitle says "Special days in the calendar", how about that? Whatever we choose, let's make sure that it is something that fits into normal text so it is easy to make links. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 00:43, 27 April 2006 (CDT)		:Well, the subtitle says "Special days in the calendar", how about that? Whatever we choose, let's make sure that it is something that fits into normal text so it is easy to make links. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 00:43, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
		+
		+	==Update due?==
		+
		+	I seem to recall the pontifices making a ruling about the significance of the various dies, including FP, some time ago. Am I right? If so, should this page be updated to reflect that ruling? - [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 02:28, 23 December 2006 (CET)

M. Lucretius Agricola: /* Title Change? */ Special days in the calendar?

2006-04-27T05:43:08Z

Title Change?: Special days in the calendar?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 27 April 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I think that perhaps this page should be changed to something like "calendrical designations" or something to that effect, since that is really what this page covers. Something on the Roman calendar on the whole would be quite an exhaustive article, which isn't what, I think, this article is meant to provide. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q. Caecilius Metellus]] 23:58, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		I think that perhaps this page should be changed to something like "calendrical designations" or something to that effect, since that is really what this page covers. Something on the Roman calendar on the whole would be quite an exhaustive article, which isn't what, I think, this article is meant to provide. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q. Caecilius Metellus]] 23:58, 26 April 2006 (CDT)
		+	:Well, the subtitle says "Special days in the calendar", how about that? Whatever we choose, let's make sure that it is something that fits into normal text so it is easy to make links. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 00:43, 27 April 2006 (CDT)

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: Title Change?

2006-04-27T04:58:24Z

Title Change?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:58, 27 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I only see one problem with this page, that being that on dies comitiales, nefasti, and nefasti publici, it is listed that magistrates may not exercise certain specific judicial functions. In the case of comitiales, a magistrate certainly could exercise any and all his judicial functions. On dies nefasti and nefasti publici, a magistrate certainly could not exercise any of his judicial functions. I post it here on the discussion page first, but if there is no discontent, I'll certainly make the necessary changes. -- Q. Caecilius Metellus		I only see one problem with this page, that being that on dies comitiales, nefasti, and nefasti publici, it is listed that magistrates may not exercise certain specific judicial functions. In the case of comitiales, a magistrate certainly could exercise any and all his judicial functions. On dies nefasti and nefasti publici, a magistrate certainly could not exercise any of his judicial functions. I post it here on the discussion page first, but if there is no discontent, I'll certainly make the necessary changes. -- Q. Caecilius Metellus
		+
		+	== Title Change? ==
		+
		+	I think that perhaps this page should be changed to something like "calendrical designations" or something to that effect, since that is really what this page covers. Something on the Roman calendar on the whole would be quite an exhaustive article, which isn't what, I think, this article is meant to provide. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q. Caecilius Metellus]] 23:58, 26 April 2006 (CDT)

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus at 10:59, 27 March 2006

2006-03-27T10:59:51Z

New page

I only see one problem with this page, that being that on dies comitiales, nefasti, and nefasti publici, it is listed that magistrates may not exercise certain specific judicial functions. In the case of comitiales, a magistrate certainly could exercise any and all his judicial functions. On dies nefasti and nefasti publici, a magistrate certainly could not exercise any of his judicial functions. I post it here on the discussion page first, but if there is no discontent, I'll certainly make the necessary changes. -- Q. Caecilius Metellus

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 9 February 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I seem to recall the pontifices making a ruling about the significance of the various dies, including FP, some time ago. Am I right? If so, should this page be updated to reflect that ruling? - [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 02:28, 23 December 2006 (CET)		I seem to recall the pontifices making a ruling about the significance of the various dies, including FP, some time ago. Am I right? If so, should this page be updated to reflect that ruling? - [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 02:28, 23 December 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	:No, what our pontifices say should be reflected on [[Calendar (Nova Roma)]]. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 03:28, 9 February 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	==Dies Nefasti==

	I was leafing through van Haeperen's 'Le collège pontifical' & she makes the point quoting Macrobius that the Dies Nefasti restrictions were primarily so magistrates could carry out their religious duties without being impeded by other work/business.[[User:Marca Hortensia Maior\|Marca Hortensia Maior]]		I was leafing through van Haeperen's 'Le collège pontifical' & she makes the point quoting Macrobius that the Dies Nefasti restrictions were primarily so magistrates could carry out their religious duties without being impeded by other work/business.[[User:Marca Hortensia Maior\|Marca Hortensia Maior]]
		+
		+	:Be bold and update. Cite your sources as usual. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 03:28, 9 February 2008 (CET)