Talk:Priests (Nova Roma) - Revision history

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: /* Article name */ ad Cn Lentulum respondeo

2009-01-05T19:42:32Z

Article name: ad Cn Lentulum respondeo

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 5 January 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:::::Last year Agricola decided another policy, namely to use always titles in the same languages as that of the articles. In view of that, he changed Tabularium into Legal system, Lingua Latina into Latin language, Roma Antiqua into Ancient Rome, Religio Romana into Roman religion etc. Are we discussing about reverting this one year policy in all? I disagreed with Agricola, but finally I came into peace and worked with these guidelines. Now everything revolves? I don't know what to think on the proposed name change now: either we change the most possible titles into Latin or not that one. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 12:11, 5 January 2009 (CET)		:::::Last year Agricola decided another policy, namely to use always titles in the same languages as that of the articles. In view of that, he changed Tabularium into Legal system, Lingua Latina into Latin language, Roma Antiqua into Ancient Rome, Religio Romana into Roman religion etc. Are we discussing about reverting this one year policy in all? I disagreed with Agricola, but finally I came into peace and worked with these guidelines. Now everything revolves? I don't know what to think on the proposed name change now: either we change the most possible titles into Latin or not that one. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 12:11, 5 January 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	:::::That certainly is a sensible policy. I wasn't aware of that policy, but I can see the sound reasoning behind it. In that case, ''Priests'' would be best here, ''Sacerdotes'' best in Latin. -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 20:42, 5 January 2009 (CET)

	== Application Link broken ==		== Application Link broken ==

	Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)		Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus: /* Article name */

2009-01-05T11:11:26Z

Article name

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 5 January 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Metellus]] 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET)		:I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Metellus]] 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET)

−	::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point ~~diectly~~ to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)	+	::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point directly to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)

	:::It seems that we never managed to get back to this one, but I would have to agree with the preceding response. It seems the best method, and an excellent way to promote Latin, even if only one word at a time (Is there any other way?). This page would certainly likely be best as ''"Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"'', with the respective links in the language bar changed overall. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 10:02, 4 January 2009 (CET)		:::It seems that we never managed to get back to this one, but I would have to agree with the preceding response. It seems the best method, and an excellent way to promote Latin, even if only one word at a time (Is there any other way?). This page would certainly likely be best as ''"Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"'', with the respective links in the language bar changed overall. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 10:02, 4 January 2009 (CET)

	::::I'm also fully in favor of that. [[User:Quintus Valerius Poplicola\|Quintus Valerius Poplicola]] 07:29, 5 January 2009 (CET)		::::I'm also fully in favor of that. [[User:Quintus Valerius Poplicola\|Quintus Valerius Poplicola]] 07:29, 5 January 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	:::::Last year Agricola decided another policy, namely to use always titles in the same languages as that of the articles. In view of that, he changed Tabularium into Legal system, Lingua Latina into Latin language, Roma Antiqua into Ancient Rome, Religio Romana into Roman religion etc. Are we discussing about reverting this one year policy in all? I disagreed with Agricola, but finally I came into peace and worked with these guidelines. Now everything revolves? I don't know what to think on the proposed name change now: either we change the most possible titles into Latin or not that one. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 12:11, 5 January 2009 (CET)

	== Application Link broken ==		== Application Link broken ==

	Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)		Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)

Quintus Valerius Poplicola at 06:29, 5 January 2009

2009-01-05T06:29:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 5 January 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:::It seems that we never managed to get back to this one, but I would have to agree with the preceding response. It seems the best method, and an excellent way to promote Latin, even if only one word at a time (Is there any other way?). This page would certainly likely be best as ''"Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"'', with the respective links in the language bar changed overall. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 10:02, 4 January 2009 (CET)		:::It seems that we never managed to get back to this one, but I would have to agree with the preceding response. It seems the best method, and an excellent way to promote Latin, even if only one word at a time (Is there any other way?). This page would certainly likely be best as ''"Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"'', with the respective links in the language bar changed overall. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 10:02, 4 January 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	::::I'm also fully in favor of that. [[User:Quintus Valerius Poplicola\|Quintus Valerius Poplicola]] 07:29, 5 January 2009 (CET)

	== Application Link broken ==		== Application Link broken ==

	Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)		Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: /* Article name */ ad Agricolam respondeo

2009-01-04T09:02:40Z

Article name: ad Agricolam respondeo

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:02, 4 January 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point diectly to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)		::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point diectly to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	:::It seems that we never managed to get back to this one, but I would have to agree with the preceding response. It seems the best method, and an excellent way to promote Latin, even if only one word at a time (Is there any other way?). This page would certainly likely be best as ''"Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"'', with the respective links in the language bar changed overall. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 10:02, 4 January 2009 (CET)

	== Application Link broken ==		== Application Link broken ==

	Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)		Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)

Marca Claudia Laurentia: Application Link broken

2007-05-01T01:57:49Z

Application Link broken

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:57, 1 May 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point diectly to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)		::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point diectly to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	== Application Link broken ==
		+
		+	Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)

M. Lucretius Agricola: ad Metellum respondeo

2006-11-10T03:54:45Z

ad Metellum respondeo

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:54, 10 November 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Metellus]] 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET)		:I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Metellus]] 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point diectly to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: ad Agricolam respondeo

2006-11-10T02:50:41Z

ad Agricolam respondeo

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 10 November 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Should this be moved to "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"? Or should we keep "Sacerdotes" as an article about sacerdotes in Roma Antiqua and use the English title (plus NR) for the modern article? [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 10:56, 8 November 2006 (CET)		Should this be moved to "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"? Or should we keep "Sacerdotes" as an article about sacerdotes in Roma Antiqua and use the English title (plus NR) for the modern article? [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 10:56, 8 November 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	:I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Metellus]] 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET)

M. Lucretius Agricola: Q re art name

2006-11-08T09:56:10Z

Q re art name

New page

==Article name==

Should this be moved to "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"? Or should we keep "Sacerdotes" as an article about sacerdotes in Roma Antiqua and use the English title (plus NR) for the modern article? [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 10:56, 8 November 2006 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 5 January 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Metellus]] 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET)		:I would, personally, rather we use "Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)" for the title. However, Cn. Astur made a good argument some time ago about using the title "priests", albeit one with which I disagree. That's not to say, though, that we can't make the current page a redirection page, and similarly with the same for Antiquity. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Metellus]] 03:50, 10 November 2006 (CET)

−	::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point ~~diectly~~ to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)	+	::My preference for wiki policy is that the articles have Latin titles and the vernacular terms are redirects to them. This would mean that the translation links ("language bar") would point directly to the translated article, not to an intermediate redirect. I don't know if that would reduce server load, but I think it sets things up in such a way as to avoid proliferation of double redirects. Additionally, using Latin titles is one way that we can promote and teach the use of Latin. I would like to hear what Astur has to say because it may be that this article should be an exception. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 04:54, 10 November 2006 (CET)

	:::It seems that we never managed to get back to this one, but I would have to agree with the preceding response. It seems the best method, and an excellent way to promote Latin, even if only one word at a time (Is there any other way?). This page would certainly likely be best as ''"Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"'', with the respective links in the language bar changed overall. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 10:02, 4 January 2009 (CET)		:::It seems that we never managed to get back to this one, but I would have to agree with the preceding response. It seems the best method, and an excellent way to promote Latin, even if only one word at a time (Is there any other way?). This page would certainly likely be best as ''"Sacerdotes (Nova Roma)"'', with the respective links in the language bar changed overall. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 10:02, 4 January 2009 (CET)

	::::I'm also fully in favor of that. [[User:Quintus Valerius Poplicola\|Quintus Valerius Poplicola]] 07:29, 5 January 2009 (CET)		::::I'm also fully in favor of that. [[User:Quintus Valerius Poplicola\|Quintus Valerius Poplicola]] 07:29, 5 January 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	:::::Last year Agricola decided another policy, namely to use always titles in the same languages as that of the articles. In view of that, he changed Tabularium into Legal system, Lingua Latina into Latin language, Roma Antiqua into Ancient Rome, Religio Romana into Roman religion etc. Are we discussing about reverting this one year policy in all? I disagreed with Agricola, but finally I came into peace and worked with these guidelines. Now everything revolves? I don't know what to think on the proposed name change now: either we change the most possible titles into Latin or not that one. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus\|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 12:11, 5 January 2009 (CET)

	== Application Link broken ==		== Application Link broken ==

	Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)		Hi, the application link works, but when I click submit it says there is an error. Can someone check this out? Thanks. [[User:Marca Claudia Laurentia\|Marca Claudia Laurentia]] 03:57, 1 May 2007 (CEST)