Subject: Re: A Civil Disagreement
From: danat@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:51:39 +1030
Salve,

Is this period ready to be written about so recently after it occurred? It
may open old wounds depending on what is said in the work. I know I for one
made a few hasty comments (made from ignorance on several issues it must be
said) as I am sure everybody did, and I wasn't even involved. Shouldn't this
be left for some time?

Vale,

Marcus Arcadius Pius




Subject: Re: A Civil Disagreement
From: danat@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 03:39:27 +1030

> There may be other and more effective ideas to deal with this internet,
> but so far that is the one that works best for me.
>
> Vale;
> Marcus Minucius Audens
>
>
> Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
>

Salve,

I agree totally :-). It's just that I ,along with many others I hope, do not
want to rehash it again. I actually resigned my citizenship during the
crises and realising that I was too hasty renounced my resignation, all
within 15 minutes!! It was a very traumatic experience. All's well that ends
well I suppose.

Vale,

Marcus Arcadius Pius




Subject: Joining
From: Che Monro flirt@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:59:30 +1100
Salve!

I figure that since I have common interests with the group, and since
various members have given so generously of their time to answer my
questions, I should join the group...

Anyway, I wanted to ask about names.

I was thinking of calling myself:

Josephus (one of my middle names) Something Australius

Or should that be Australicus or Australianus? :)

Does anyone know a good Gens to join? I suppose I could always start
Monronius... Monrovius? *Crosseyed look*

Any comments welcome! *blithely*

Che

You have been flirting with Che Monro - The infamous Internet Flirt!
&l--------href="/pos--------varoma?pro--------ID=230128020180175135050082190036" &g--------ir--------..&l--------&g-------- &l--------href="h--------//www.geoci--------.com/Paris/Cafe/2079" --------e---------------- &g----------------/www.geoci--------.com/Paris/Cafe/2079&l--------&g--------r>


Subject: Centuriata Voting Results
From: Decius Iunius Palladius amcgrath@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:09:07 -0500 (EST)


Salvete! The final tally of the votes having been completed by the
rogatores, the results of the voting in the Comitia Centuriata are now
ready to be released:


I. Office of Censor -- 57 centuries have voted L Cornelius Sulla into
office.

Congratulations Lucius Cornelius Sulla!


II. Office of Consul -- 53 centuries have voted Q Fabius into office,
and 49 M Minucius Audens

Congratulations Quintus Fabius Maximus and Marcus Minucius Audens!


III. Praetores

Praetor Elect Antoninus Gryllus Graecus-voted for by 6 centuries
Praetor Elect Marcus Iunius Iulinaus- voted for by 4 centuries

Congratulations Antoninus Gryllus Graecus and Marcus Iunius Iulianus!

Both runners, Appius Caludius Lucentius Nigellus and Lucius Annaeus
Laurentius each polled 2 centuries each.

IV. Lex Iunia de Magistratuum Aetate --
passed by 44 centuries, with 17 voting against.

This is now law.

V. Lex Iunia Cornelia -- passed by 55 centuries, with 9 voting against.

This proposed amendment to the constitution is now passed and will go to
the senate later this week for ratification.

VI. Lex de Ratione Eligium -- passed by 62 centuries, with 2 voting
against VII Lex Iunia Centuriata -- passed by 55 centuries, with 8
voting against

This is now law.


Details of the voting, including a breakdown of votes by century on the
Lex Iunia de Magistratuum Aetate, will be provided tomorrow as soon as
the breakdown of the details are received from the Rogatores. I thank them
for their hard and often unappreciated work on behalf of Nova Roma.
Believe me, we owe Gaius Marius Merullus and Titus Labienus Fortunatus an
immense debt for their work in these elections.

I congratulate all the winners of the various races, and thank each and
every one of you for voting. You made this election the most highly
attended in Nova Roma history! I hope that this trend of increased
involvement only continues.


A reminder to all magistrates-elect that your oath of office is to be
taken on the day that you take office, January 1, 2000, at or after 12:01
AM Roman time, 1800 (6 PM EST). As mandated by law, you will not
officially hold your position until that oath is taken.



In Service to Rome,

Decius Iunius Palladius,
Consul of Nova Roma








Subject: Re: Joining
From: hadji hadji@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 08:56:44 +0100
Salve Aule Sarmatice

Even my first name Alexander is not "purely" Latin, but noone discuss
it.
I find Josephus to a pretty Roman name. Just remember the historician
Josephus Flavius. I think all the names used in ancient Roman
mediterranian world are quite suitable for our new citizens. As for
Josephus we have got one and he is Josephus Aurelianus Pannonicus.

Bene vale

Alexander I.C. Probus M.

From: "Artem Kouzminyk--------4; <a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=224212113078159153036161203004129208071" >ural_liz@--------</a>
Subject: Re: Joining

Salve!

AFAIK, the names NRomans choose are usually original ancient Roman
names,
that can be found at URL <a href="http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html" target="_top" >http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html</a>.
So
Josephus and Australius do not seem to be Roman;-). You can use
Australius
for a additional cognomen, as SARMATICVS in my name.



Subject: Merry holidays
From: hadji <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=180166080058082135130082190036" >hadji@--------</a>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:03:19 +0100
Salvete omnes,

I wish you all merry and joyful holidays (whatever you name them - the
meaning is equal).
Let the New Year Millenium brings to all of you much love, happiness and
health.
I think right now is the right time for everyone here to find ways to
each other and to accent on things which join us in this nice family
named Nova Roma.

Yours

Alexander Iul.Caess. Probus

Praetor Pannoniae Provinciae



Subject: Re: Re: Joining
From: "A. Artorius Arius Sarmaticus" sarmaticus@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:20:26 YEKT
Salve Probe et salvete alii!

Just checking my new "Roman" email - please write me to
<a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=061166091213158134036102228219114187071048139" >sarmaticus@--------</a> if you want;-)

I think Alexander is Hellenic/Greek (very appropriate for NR therefor),
since Josephus is certainly jewish... Please not to think that I'm
antisemite!!! But Josephus IMHO is less Roman nevertheless.

AVLVS ARTORIVS ARIVS SARMATICVS, CIVIS ET BARBARVS NOVAE ROMAE

LIBERTAS INAESTIMABILIS RES EST

VALETE IN PACE


>From: hadji <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=180166080058082135130082190036" >hadji@--------</a>
>Reply-To: <a href="mailto:novaroma@--------" >novaroma@--------</a>
>To: <a href="mailto:Novaroma@--------" >Novaroma@--------</a>
>Subject: [novaroma] Re: Joining
>Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 08:56:44 +0100
>
>From: hadji <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=180166080058082135130082190036" >hadji@--------</a>
>
>Salve Aule Sarmatice
>
>Even my first name Alexander is not "purely" Latin, but noone discuss
>it.
>I find Josephus to a pretty Roman name. Just remember the historician
>Josephus Flavius. I think all the names used in ancient Roman
>mediterranian world are quite suitable for our new citizens. As for
>Josephus we have got one and he is Josephus Aurelianus Pannonicus.
>
>Bene vale
>
>Alexander I.C. Probus M.
>
>From: "Artem Kouzminyk--------4; <a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=224212113078159153036161203004129208071" >ural_liz@--------</a>
>Subject: Re: Joining
>
>Salve!
>
>AFAIK, the names NRomans choose are usually original ancient Roman
>names,
>that can be found at URL <a href="http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html" target="_top" >http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html</a>.
>So
>Josephus and Australius do not seem to be Roman;-). You can use
>Australius
>for a additional cognomen, as SARMATICVS in my name.
>
>



Subject: Re: Augurs
From: Marius Fimbria legion6@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:24:42 -0600 (CST)
Salvete...

><a href="/post/--------roma?protectID=123056091213158116025056228219114090071048139" >germa--------s@--------</a> (to Germa--------s) ------^^^^^
Better make that <a href="/post/--------roma?protectID=123056091213158116036102228219114090071048139" >germa--------s@--------</a> if you wa--------t to get
through to him...(our esteemed junior Consul does tend to transliterate
it...) >({|;-)

************************************************************
Lucius Marius Fimbria |>[SPQR]<|




Subject: Re: Joining
From: "Don and Crys Meaker" famromo@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 08:00:04 -0600
On 21 Dec 99, at 20:14, Artem Kouzminykh wrote:

>
> AFAIK, the names NRomans choose are usually original ancient Roman names,
> that can be found at URL <a href="http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html" target="_top" >http://www.novaroma.org/via_romana/names.html</a>. So
> Josephus and Australius do not seem to be Roman;-). You can use Australius
> for a additional cognomen, as SARMATICVS in my name.

Now now, my name was Latinized from my "pagan" name which is
"paganized" from my legal name.

Pax vobiscum,
Amethystia Iunia Crystallina Materna
Great OneLists <G>
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/community/1LifeTeachers" target="_top" >http://www.onelist.com/community/1LifeTeachers</a>
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/community/1PP" target="_top" >http://www.onelist.com/community/1PP</a>
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/community/ANaturalSolution" target="_top" >http://www.onelist.com/community/ANaturalSolution</a>
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/community/ArmedPagans" target="_top" >http://www.onelist.com/community/ArmedPagans</a>
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/community/Many_Paths-2" target="_top" >http://www.onelist.com/community/Many_Paths-2</a>
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/community/MenFinallyLoved" target="_top" >http://www.onelist.com/community/MenFinallyLoved</a>
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/community/PaganMasterCook" target="_top" >http://www.onelist.com/community/PaganMasterCook</a>
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/community/TheMEANParent" target="_top" >http://www.onelist.com/community/TheMEANParent</a>



Subject: Re: Re: Joining
From: LSergAust@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 12:31:59 EST
Salve,

Josephus Flavius's name was (if memory serves) Joseph Ben Mathias. He was
Jewish, but switched sides (under strange circumstances) during the
Jewish War, and adopted the cognomen of the Flavii to honor the Roman
generals to whom he attached himself (Vespasianus and his son, Titus).
He's a classic example of a non-Roman romanizing his name.

Vale,

L. Sergius Aust.

On 12/22/99 1:56 AM hadji (<a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=180166080058082135130082190036" >hadji@--------</a>) wrote:

>From: hadji <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=180166080058082135130082190036" >hadji@--------</a>
>
>Salve Aule Sarmatice
>
>Even my first name Alexander is not "purely" Latin, but noone discuss
>it.
>I find Josephus to a pretty Roman name. Just remember the historician
>Josephus Flavius. I think all the names used in ancient Roman
>mediterranian world are quite suitable for our new citizens. As for
>Josephus we have got one and he is Josephus Aurelianus Pannonicus.
>
>Bene vale
>
>Alexander I.C. Probus M.


illud Latine dici non potest.

(You can't say that in Latin.)




Subject: Re:
From: Diana Aventina diana_aventina@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:07:45 -0800 (PST)
Lvcivs Annevs LAVRENTIVS said:

> I think it's necessarious that all citizens know about
> the history of their nation, as in real countries as in
>virtual nations.
I would agree with you, except that for some reason, people
say nasty things on public email lists that they would
never dream of saying face to face (with a room full of
people to witness it). Perhaps those newcomers that are
nosey and gossipy (whoops! I meant to type "interested")can
ask in private to their paterfamilias for details as to the
history of Nova Roma.

> I also think it's deplorable to say "stop talking about
> that" or "we shouldn't discuss about this, it's
>dangerous..."
Deplorable? Hmmm, I've had worse comments to things that
I've said :-)
Bright Blessings,
Diana
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: <a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com" target="_top" >http://shopping.yahoo.com</a>



Subject: Re:
From: GregTheRed@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:28:38 EST
Salvete!

Perhaps Nova Roma should appoint an Historian to compile an accurate
and impartial Official History of Nova Roma. The great Roman historians of
the past (Livy, The Divine Claudius, Suetonius, etc..) would be disgusted if
the witnessed the possibility of a new begining of Roma that is not recorded!

Tiberius Augustulus Claudius.



Subject: Re:
From: jmath669642reng@--------)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:09:17 -0500 (EST)
Tiberius Augustus Claudius;

We did have a Historian who did a great job! We would like to have him
back, which is one reason for the delay in appointing another.

Merrullus' message asking for anyone new to NR who is interested and
qualified was sent for just that purpose.

We currenty have at least one person engaged in such an effort who is
qualified and interested.

Marcus Minucius Audens

Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!




Subject: Re: Centuriata Voting Results
From: "Antonio Grilo" amg@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:29:38 -0000
Salvete omnes

First of all, I'd like to thank all the people of Rome for their confidence.
I'll do my best to fulfill what is expected from me as Praetor.
I would also like to congratulate all the victors in these elections, as
well as shake the end of all those who, despite their valour, did not
succeed to win. I sure other opportunities will come.

Happy Saturnalia and Agon Solis.

Valete
Antonius Gryllus Graecus
Winner of elections for Praetor




Subject: Naming
From: jmath669642reng@--------)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:48:06 -0500 (EST)
On the above subject you could also adopt a name from the many Roman
Gravestones that have been recorded in the archaelogical archives, as I
did. I chose the name of a Roman who was involved in the kind of work
that I wanted to study and from a miltary background. My Roman
Paterfamilius is Marcus Minucius Audens, XXth Legio, Milles Immunes
(Soldier immune fatigues), gromaciti (military surveyor), and gubernator
(pilot-probably river or coastal) who died and was buried in Roman
Britain. Thus, I have pursued the studty of Roman Military Engineering
and Cartography following in my anchestor's footsteps.

So, by adopting this name, I also adopt a possible course of study, a
new hobby (retired), and a new provincia. Although I was born and live
in the United States (Yankee!!!!!) I have adopted vicariosly Great
Britain as well. In my estimation a bargain all round!!!

Marcus Minucius Audens

Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!




Subject: Re: Disagreements & Histories
From: jmath669642reng@--------)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:04:25 -0500 (EST)
Savete, Citizens;

I agree to some degree with Australicus and Aventina in regard to the
potetial disagreement over any history written now. Norally histories
of this sort are left until after the demise of the principals. I am
sure that there are some things which I may have said and /or done
during that "conflict period" which from hind sight, I wish I could
change, and I suspect that many will feel that way as well. To that
extent, I believe that any "history" of that period should be conducted
on a low-key basis. As we have seen, those who acted for the best of
reasons will never be beieved by contemporaries of the opposite view,
and I feel that those people who served to the best of their ability,
should be protected from the 20-20 hind-sight that will be leveled at
them, regardless of ho carefully the "history" is researched and
written.

On the other hand, were the many troubled periods of Roman History not
recorded we would not be here doing as we are doing, and I believe that
the history should be written at some time in the future, by someone who
was not a participant. As for the newcomers to NR, I have gone to some
trouble to provide a general view of what happened in order for you to
pursue your individual research, so as not to publicy embarass or harass
those involved. As I also included in that message, there are also some
deep feelings remaining about this topic. Do your research if you must
for your satisfaction, but I really do not believe your personal
satisfaction merits the disturbing of old wounds so recently opened of
people who have served NR in the past.

Marcus Minucius Audens

Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!




Subject: Exact Breakdown of results
From: Decius Iunius Palladius amcgrath@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 22:52:09 -0500 (EST)

Salvete Cives! As promised last night, I enclose below the exact breakdown
of results as presented to me by the rogatores.


In Service to Rome,

Decius Iunius Palladius,
Consul


Suffragia Centuriatorum Comitorum

I Officium Censoris
Centuria Novae Romae Lucium Cornelium Sullam Censorem fecerunt 66 vel
Romano modo LXVI cives in 57 vel Romano modo LVII centuriis suffragia
tulerunt

II Officium Consulis
Quintus Fabius et Marcus Minucius Audens facti sunt consules Novae
Romae 59 vel Romano modo LIX cives in 53 vel Romano modo LIII centuriis
pro Q Fabio ac 56 vel Romano modo LVI cives in 49 vel Romano modo XLIX
centuriis pro M Minucio Audente suffragia tulerunt

IV Lex Iunia de Magistratuum Aetate
Lex Iunia de Magistratuum Aetate sancta est 44 vel Romano modo XLIV
centuriis in eo numero I II VI VII VIII XI XIV XV
XX XXIII XXIV XXV XXVII XXX XXXI XXXIII
XLV L LI LXII LXXII LXXXI LXXXVI CXIII CXXIII
CXXVII CXXIX CXXXI CXXXII CXXXIV CXXXV CXXXVII CXXXVIII
CXLVIII CXLIX CLII CLVII CLIX CLXIII CLXXVI CLXXX CLXXXIV
CLXXXVII CLXXXIX

In 17 vel Romano modo XVII centuriis pars maiora civum suffragia contra
legem tulerunt in eo numero III IV V X XVIII XIX
XXXVIII LXIV XCVIII CXI CXX CXLII CLXVII CLXXIV CLXXXII
CLXXXVI CLXXXVIII

74 vel Romano modo LXXIV cives suffragia tulerunt ut tabula centuriis
secunda indicat

centuria suffragia pro lege suffragia contra legem
I 2
II 2
III 1
IV 1
V 1
VI 1
VII 1
VIII 2
IX
X 1
XI 1
XII
XIII
XIV 2
XV 1
XVI 1 1
XVII
XVIII 1
XIX 1
XX 1
XXI
XXII
XXIII 1
XXIV 1
XXV 1
XXVI
XXVII 1
XXVIII
XXIX
XXX 1
XXXI 1
XXXII
XXXIII 1
XXXIV
XXXV
XXXVI
XXXVII
XXXVIII 1
XXXIX
XL
XLI
XLII
XLIII
XLIV
XLV 1
XLVI
XLVII
XLVIII
XLIX
L 1
LI 1
LII
LIII
LIV
LV
LVI
LVII
LVIII
LIX
LX
LXI
LXII 1
LXIII
LXIV 1
LXV
LXVI
LXVII
LXVIII
LXIX
LXX
LXXI
LXXII 1
LXXIII
LXXIV
LXXV
LXXVI
LXXVII
LXXVIII
LXXIX
LXXX
LXXXI 1
LXXXII
LXXXIII
LXXXIV
LXXXV
LXXXVI 1
LXXXVII
LXXXVIII
LXXXIX
XC
XCI
XCII
XCIII
XCIV
XCV
XCVI
XCVII
XCVIII 1
XCIX
C
CI
CII
CIII
CIV
CV
CVI
CVII
CVIII
CIX
CX
CXI 1
CXII
CXIII 1
CXIV
CXV
CXVI
CXVII
CXVIII
CXIX
CXX 1
CXXI
CXXII
CXXIII 1
CXXIV
CXXV
CXXVI
CXXVII 1
CXXVIII
CXXIX 1
CXXX
CXXXI 1
CXXXII 1
CXXXIII
CXXXIV 1
CXXXV 1
CXXXVI
CXXXVII 1
CXXXVIII 2
CXXXIX
CXL
CXLI
CXLII 1
CXLIII
CXLIV
CXLV
CXLVI
CXLVII
CXLVIII 1
CXLIX 1
CL
CLI
CLII 1
CLIII
CLIV
CLV
CLVI
CLVII 1
CLVIII
CLIX 1
CLX
CLXI
CLXII
CLXIII 1
CLXIV
CLXV
CLXVI
CLXVII 1
CLXVIII
CLXIX
CLXX
CLXXI
CLXXII
CLXXIII
CLXXIV 1
CLXXV
CLXXVI 1
CLXXVII
CLXXVIII
CLXXIX
CLXXX 2
CLXXXI 1 1
CLXXXII 1
CLXXXIII
CLXXXIV 1
CLXXXV
CLXXXVI 1
CLXXXVII 1
CLXXXVIII 2
CLXXXIX 1
CXC
CXCI 1 1
CXCII
CXCIII

V Lex Iunia Cornelia
Lex Iunia Cornelia sancta est 55 vel Romano modo LV centuriis in eo
numero I II III IV VI VII VIII X
XI XIII XIV XV XVIII XIX XXIII XXV
XXVII XXX XXXI XXXIII L LI LXII LXIV
LXXXI LXXXVI XCVIII CXI CXIII CXX
CXXIII CXXVII CXXIX CXXXI CXXXII CXXXIV CXXXV
CXXXVII CXXXVIII CXLII CXLVIII CLII CLVII CLXIII
CLXVII CLXXIV CLXXVI CLXXX CLXXXI CLXXXII
CLXXXIV CLXXXVI CLXXXVIII CLXXXIX CXCI

In 9 vel Romano modo IX centuriis pars maiora civum suffragia contra
legem tulerunt in eo numero V XX XXIV XXXVIII XLV
LXXII CXLIX CLIX CLXXXVII


VI Lex Iunia Cornelia "de Ratione Eligium"
Haec lex Iunia Cornelia sancta est 62 vel Romano modo LXII centuriis in
eo numero I II III IV V VI VII
VIII X XI XIII XIV XV
XVIII XIX XX XXIII XXIV XXV XXVII
XXX XXXI XXXIII XXXVIII XLV L LI LXII LXIV
LXXII LXXXI XCVIII CXI CXIII CXX CXXIII CXXVII
CXXIX CXXXI CXXXII
CXXXIV CXXXV CXXXVII CXXXVIII CXLII CXLVIII CXLIX
CLII CLVII
CLIX CLXIII CLXXIV CLXXVI
CLXXX CLXXXI CLXXXII CLXXXIV CLXXXVI
CLXXXVII CLXXXVIII CLXXXIX CXCI


In centuriis LXXXVI et CLXVII pars maiora civum suffragia contra legem
tulerunt

VII Lex Iunia Centuriata
Lex Iunia Centuriata sancta est 55 vel Romano modo LV centuriis in eo
numero I II IV VI VII VIII X
XI XIX XX XXIII XXIV XXV XXVII XXX XXXI
XXXIII XLV L LI LXII LXIV LXXII
LXXXVI XCVIII CXI CXIII CXX
CXXIII CXXVII CXXIX CXXXI CXXXII CXXXIV CXXXV
CXXXVII CXXXVIII
CXLII CXLVIII CXLIX CLII CLVII CLIX
CLXIII CLXXIV CLXXVI CLXXX CLXXXI CLXXXII CLXXXIV
CLXXXVI CLXXXVII CLXXXVIII
CLXXXIX CXCI


In 8 vel Romano modo VIII centuriis pars maiora civum suffragia contra
legem tulerunt in eo numero III V XIII XV
XVI XVIII XXXVIII CLXVII




Ave Consul Deci Iuni

This is to report details of the voting for praetores in Comitia
Centuriata.

Lucius Anneus Laurentius: 2 centuries; XVIII, LXXXVI
Appius Claudius Lucentius Nigellus: 2 centuries; LXXII, CLIII
Marcus Iunius Iulianus: 4 centuries; XIV, L, CXXXI, CXCI
Antonius Gryllus Graecus: 6 centuries; II, VII, VIII, CLXXVI, CLXXXI,
CLXXXVII

49 centuries were tied.

A breakdown of all votes by century is provided in the attached MS Word
6.0/95 file "Suffragia Centuriatorum Comitiorum pro 2 praetoribus". The
leftmost column of the table identifies the century; the next four
columns report the number of votes for each candidate; the four columns
thereafter indicate whether any candidate won that century; the final
column indicates tied centuries, excluding non-voting ones.

Vivat Roma
Vivat Nova Roma

Rogatores
T Labienus Fortunatus
C Marius Merullus




Suffragia Centuriatorum Comitorum
Pro Duobus Praetoribus

Antonius Cryllus Craecus et Marcus Iunius Iulianus facti sunt praetores
Novae Romae 6 vel Romano modo VI centuria pro A Cryllo Craeco ac 4 vel
Romano modo IV centuria pro M Iunio Iuliano suffragia tulerunt

centurium suff pro LAL pro ACLN pro MII pro ACC cent
pro Aequa
LAL ACLN MII ACC
I II II I
II I I II II
III I I III
IV
V I I V
VI I I VI
VII I VII
VIII I I II VIII
IX
X I I X
XI I I XI
XII
XIII I I XIII
XIV I II I XIV
XV I I XV
XVI II II XVI
XVII
XVIII I XVIII
XIX I I XIX
XX I I XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII I I XXIII
XXIV I I XXIV
XXV I I XXV
XXVI
XXVII I I XXVII
XXVIII
XXIX
XXX I I XXX
XXXI I I XXXI
XXXII
XXXIII I I XXXIII
XXXIV
XXXV
XXXVI
XXXVII
XXXVIII I I XXXVIII
XXXIX
XL
XLI
XLII
XLIII
XLIV
XLV I I XLV
XLVI
XLVII
XLVIII
XLIX
L I L
LI I I LI
LII
LIII
LIV
LV
LVI
LVII
LVIII
LIX
LX
LXI
LXII I I LXII
LXIII
LXIV I I LXIV
LXV
LXVI
LXVII
LXVIII
LXIX
LXX
LXXI
LXXII I LXXII
LXXIII
LXXIV
LXXV
LXXVI
LXXVII
LXXVIII
LXXIX
LXXX
LXXXI
LXXXII
LXXXIII
LXXXIV
LXXXV
LXXXVI I LXXXVI
LXXXVII
LXXXVIII
LXXXIX
XC
XCI
XCII
XCIII
XCIV
XCV
XCVI
XCVII
XCVIII I I XCVIII
XCIX
C
CI
CII
CIII
CIV
CV
CVI
CVII
CVIII
CIX
CX
CXI I I CXI
CXII
CXIII I I CXIII
CXIV
CXV
CXVI
CXVII
CXVIII
CXIX
CXX I I CXX
CXXI
CXXII
CXXIII I I CXXIII
CXXIV
CXXV
CXXVI
CXXVII I I CXXVII
CXXVIII
CXXIX I I CXXIX
CXXX
CXXXI I CXXXI
CXXXII I I CXXXII
CXXXIII
CXXXIV I I CXXXIV
CXXXV I I CXXXV
CXXXVI
CXXXVII I I CXXXVII
CXXXVIII I I I CXXXVIII
CXXXIX
CXL
CXLI
CXLII I I CXLII
CXLIII
CXLIV
CXLV
CXLVI
CXLVII
CXLVIII I I CXLVIII
CXLIX I I CXLIX
CL
CLI
CLII I I CLII
CLIII I CLIII
CLIV
CLV
CLVI
CLVII I I CLVII
CLVIII
CLIX I I CLIX
CLX
CLXI
CLXII
CLXIII I I CLXIII
CLXIV
CLXV
CLXVI
CLXVII I I CLXVII
CLXVIII
CLXIX
CLXX
CLXXI
CLXXII
CLXXIII
CLXXIV I I CLXXIV
CLXXV
CLXXVI I CLXXVI
CLXXVII
CLXXVIII
CLXXIX
CLXXX I I CLXXX
CLXXXI I I II CLXXXI
CLXXXII I I CLXXXII
CLXXXIII
CLXXXIV I I CLXXXIV
CLXXXV
CLXXXVI I I CLXXXVI
CLXXXVII I CLXXXVII
CLXXXVIII II II CLXXXVIII
CLXXXIX
CXC
CXCI I II I CXCI
CXCII
CXCIII






Subject: E-mail address change
From: Donald and Crystal L Meaker meakerfam@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:35:18 -0600
All right everybody. We have changed our e-mail address. We can still
receive e-mail at the AOL account and the dune.net account. AOL was just
entirely too slow. Juno is cheaper in any event. We are sending this to
all the lists we are signed with.

Pax vobiscum,
Crys and Don



Subject: Re: Checking - to the list moderator
From: Lucius Cornelius Sulla alexious@--------
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 23:23:12 -0800
Do you think you might be able to resend it? This message came through clear.

L. Cornelius Sulla

<a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=061166091213158134036102228219114187071048139" >sarmaticus@--------</a> wrote:

> From: <a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=061166091213158134036102228219114187071048139" >sarmaticus@--------</a>
>
> Salve!
>
> Dear Sir/Madam!
>
> Could you please inform me why my latest messages are not appearing in the List? I am a member AFAIK. Am I blocked, banned or something else?
>
> AVLVS ARTORIVS ARIVS SARMATICVS, CIVIS ET BARBARVS NOVAE ROMAE
>
> LIBERTAS INAESTIMABILIS RES EST
>
> VALETE IN PACE
>
>